Articles
<![CDATA[ANALISIS KASUS PRITA MULYASARI DALAM PUTUSAN PENINJIAUAN KEMBALI NO. 225 PK/PID.SUS/2011 ]]>
<![CDATA[Arviana, Nerissa]]>;
<![CDATA[Mandiana, Sari]]>;
<![CDATA[Setyabudhi, Jusup Jacobus]]>
<![CDATA[ YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2020): JURNAL YUSTISIA MERDEKA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Merdeka Madiun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33319/yume.v6i2.47
<![CDATA[Social media are growing so rapidly now, besides having a positive impact on society, it also has negative impacts such as hoaxes, pornography, and defamation. Some cases that are closely related to social media are criminal defamation in violation of the Information and Electronic Transactions Law, as experienced by Prita Mulyasari, a case that was initiated by sending a complaint email for Omni Hospital to her friends, so She was charged violating No. 11 of Information and Electronic Transactions Law year 2008, in this study the author uses the Doctrinal or Normative Juridical research methodology by discussing court decision No. 225 PK / PID. SUS / 2011 where in this case Prita Mulyasari was dismissed by the Tangerang District Court, but was found guilty at the Supreme Court level and finally was released free at the Judicial Review level.Keywords: Prita Mulyasari; RS. Omni; Information and Electronic Transaction Law]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS YURIDIS TENTANG PERETASAN DATA PRIBADI PENUMPANG LION AIR ]]>
<![CDATA[Leunard, Michael]]>;
<![CDATA[Mandiana, Sari]]>;
<![CDATA[Setyabudhi, Jusup Jacobus]]>
<![CDATA[ YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2020): JURNAL YUSTISIA MERDEKA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Merdeka Madiun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33319/yume.v6i2.51
<![CDATA[In the era of information explosion through information technology and communication by means of the internet, information and self-identity is very easy, it can be obtained both for the benefit of the owner of personal data and business interests. One of the cases is the case of the personal data of a Lion Air passenger that has been hacked. The personal data of Lion Group's passengers, namely Marindo Air, Lion Air, Thai Air which covers 7.8 million personal data of passengers from countries including Indonesia, have been hacked by groups of irresponsible people. Legal consequences for victims of Lion Group passengers by hacking of personal data written in Article 26 of the ITE Law which regulates the protection of personal data, but in Article 26 of the Law ITE does not contain a criminal threat that can be imposed on someone when using other people's personal data information without the relevant consent. The personal data protection bill The personal data protection bill is very much needed, that is special protection, because personal data is part of the human rights issue in consideration of the personal data protection draft law .Keywords: Due to the law; Personal Data Hacking; Lion Air Passenger..]]>
<![CDATA[PENYELESAIAN PERKARA KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS DENGAN PELAKU DIBAWAH UMUR ]]>
<![CDATA[Irawan, Joshua Evandeo]]>;
<![CDATA[Mandiana, Sari]]>;
<![CDATA[Widjiastuti, Agustin]]>
<![CDATA[ YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 6, No 1 (2020): JURNAL YUSTISIA MERDEKA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Merdeka Madiun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33319/yume.v6i1.45
<![CDATA[Traffic accident often happens and involved underage child as driver of the vehicle and might lead to fatal consequences, such as the death casualities. In Indonesia, it is stipulated in Act No. 22 Year 2009 concerning Traffic and Road Transportation. The result shows that M’s illegal underage driving caused the death of K. Thus, M and his family are obliged to give compensation to the K’s family as stipulated in of Act No. 22 Year 2009 throughout Juvenile Justice System as the case procedur using Diversion case is stipulated in Act No. 11 Year 2012 regarding Juvenile Justice System]]>
<![CDATA[PENYELESAIAN PERKARA KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS DENGAN PELAKU DIBAWAH UMUR ]]>
<![CDATA[Joshua Evandeo Irawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Sari Mandiana]]>;
<![CDATA[Agustin Widjiastuti]]>
<![CDATA[ YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): JURNAL YUSTISIA MERDEKA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Merdeka Madiun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33319/yume.v6i1.45
<![CDATA[Traffic accident often happens and involved underage child as driver of the vehicle and might lead to fatal consequences, such as the death casualities. In Indonesia, it is stipulated in Act No. 22 Year 2009 concerning Traffic and Road Transportation. The result shows that M’s illegal underage driving caused the death of K. Thus, M and his family are obliged to give compensation to the K’s family as stipulated in of Act No. 22 Year 2009 throughout Juvenile Justice System as the case procedur using Diversion case is stipulated in Act No. 11 Year 2012 regarding Juvenile Justice System]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS KASUS PRITA MULYASARI DALAM PUTUSAN PENINJIAUAN KEMBALI NO. 225 PK/PID.SUS/2011 ]]>
<![CDATA[Nerissa Arviana]]>;
<![CDATA[Sari Mandiana]]>;
<![CDATA[Jusup Jacobus Setyabudhi]]>
<![CDATA[ YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): JURNAL YUSTISIA MERDEKA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Merdeka Madiun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33319/yume.v6i2.47
<![CDATA[Social media are growing so rapidly now, besides having a positive impact on society, it also has negative impacts such as hoaxes, pornography, and defamation. Some cases that are closely related to social media are criminal defamation in violation of the Information and Electronic Transactions Law, as experienced by Prita Mulyasari, a case that was initiated by sending a complaint email for Omni Hospital to her friends, so She was charged violating No. 11 of Information and Electronic Transactions Law year 2008, in this study the author uses the Doctrinal or Normative Juridical research methodology by discussing court decision No. 225 PK / PID. SUS / 2011 where in this case Prita Mulyasari was dismissed by the Tangerang District Court, but was found guilty at the Supreme Court level and finally was released free at the Judicial Review level.Keywords: Prita Mulyasari; RS. Omni; Information and Electronic Transaction Law]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS YURIDIS TENTANG PERETASAN DATA PRIBADI PENUMPANG LION AIR ]]>
<![CDATA[Michael Leunard]]>;
<![CDATA[Sari Mandiana]]>;
<![CDATA[Jusup Jacobus Setyabudhi]]>
<![CDATA[ YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): JURNAL YUSTISIA MERDEKA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Merdeka Madiun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33319/yume.v6i2.51
<![CDATA[In the era of information explosion through information technology and communication by means of the internet, information and self-identity is very easy, it can be obtained both for the benefit of the owner of personal data and business interests. One of the cases is the case of the personal data of a Lion Air passenger that has been hacked. The personal data of Lion Group's passengers, namely Marindo Air, Lion Air, Thai Air which covers 7.8 million personal data of passengers from countries including Indonesia, have been hacked by groups of irresponsible people. Legal consequences for victims of Lion Group passengers by hacking of personal data written in Article 26 of the ITE Law which regulates the protection of personal data, but in Article 26 of the Law ITE does not contain a criminal threat that can be imposed on someone when using other people's personal data information without the relevant consent. The personal data protection bill The personal data protection bill is very much needed, that is special protection, because personal data is part of the human rights issue in consideration of the personal data protection draft law .Keywords: Due to the law; Personal Data Hacking; Lion Air Passenger..]]>
<![CDATA[Konsepsi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Sebagai Sistem Normatif ]]>
<![CDATA[Sari Mandiana]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS Vol. 5 No. 2 (2016): Jurnal Hukum Prioris Volume 5 Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Trisakti University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1565.617 KB)
|
DOI: 10.25105/prio.v5i2.559
<![CDATA[Banyaknya para pelaku korupsi yang bebas maupun penjatuhan sanksi/pidana yang tidak tepat dan merupakan cerminan lemahnya upaya penegakan hukum di negeri ini. Bebasnya para terdakwa maupun ketidaktepatan strafsoort dan strafmaat setidaknya menunjukkan kelemahan sejak di JPU maupun sampai di majelis hakim yang mengindikasikan sikap tidak professional dalam mengadili perkara. Putusan pengadilan kasus-kasus korupsi sangat memilukan dan jauh dari rasa keadilan masyarakat maupun bagi negara yang dirugikan. Ketidaktepatan penjatuhan sanksi maupun putusan bebas, alih-alih menjadikan pra koruptor itu malah melenggang menghirup udara bebas.]]>
<![CDATA[MINIMALISASI DISPARITAS PIDANA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI MELALUI AJARAN DUALISTIS ]]>
<![CDATA[Sari Mandiana]]>
<![CDATA[ Lex Publica Vol. 1 No. 2 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[APPTHI ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (288.177 KB)
<![CDATA[Menjatuhkan suatu pidana atau suatu tindakan, adalah suatu perbuatan yang diarahkan pada suatu tujuan. Dan ini adalah sangat penting sekali bagi hakim yang mengadili juga mengetahui tentang arti dari apa yang telah dilakukannya/diputuskannya. Arti pertanggungan jawab pidana disini adalah keputusan dalam apa yang harus dilakukan dalam keadaan konkrit terhadap pelaku delik. Suatu hukum pidana berdasarkan kesalahan hanya dapat diberi isinya oleh pertimbangan-pertimbangan berdasarkan tujuan kemanfaatannya. Hubungan antara tujuan dan keputusan untuk mewujudkan tujuan itu dengan suatu cara tertentu akan mendapatkan tempatnya yang lebih baik. Demikian, jika ada pelanggaran norma hukum (undang-undang) dan ada sanksinya, selalu akan ada pertanggungan jawab pidana. Pertanggungan jawab pidana dapat terjadi dalam bentuk penjatuhan sanksi berupa pidana mati, memenjarakan, menjatuhkan suatu denda, dan pelbagai bentuk-bentuk lainnya. Dasar bagi pertanggungan jawab pidana ini adalah kesalahan, yang hanya muncul / ada karena keharusan adanya suatu aksi yang harus dibenarkan pula. Ada suatu ikatan yang logis antara kesalahan dan apa yang menyusul kemudiannya. Kesalahan harus merupakan dasar, merupakan alasan, merupakan tujuan, merupakan ratio daripada sanksi yang harus dipertanggungjawabkan untuk dapat digunakan dengan sebaik-baiknya. Penerobosan harus dilaksanakan atas struktur tersebut dengan menegaskan bahwa menjatuhkan suatu pidana atau tindakan adalah suatu tindakan dengan mana Hakim mampu memberikan putusan yang rasional tentang kerangka/gambaran mengenai apakah selanjutnya yang akan terjadi dengan terhukum, dan kerangka ini dapat bersifat luas atau sempit. Disinilah diperlukan hakim yang harus benar-benar dengan tepat mengetahui keputusan yang bagaimanakah yang dihasilkannya dan manfaatnya bagi terpidana.]]>
<![CDATA[Juridical analysis of legal protection for online fintech debtors “Cash Maju” ]]>
<![CDATA[Monica Maya Franscisca]]>;
<![CDATA[Sari Mandiana]]>;
<![CDATA[Andyna Susiawati Achmad]]>
<![CDATA[ The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): September: Law, Politic and Sosiology ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Trigin Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35335/ijopsor.v11i2.169
<![CDATA[Cash Maju is one of the Fintech Lending Applications that offers accounts receivable online. In the implementation of online accounts receivable practices, it should be in accordance with the provisions of POJK Number 10 of 2022. Data collection is carried out by researching library materials or secondary materials. The approach taken is through the Law (statute approach) by examining each related Law and regulation, and through a conceptual approach, which is an approach carried out by looking at the doctrines of legal experts contained in the literature. The results of the analysis of this final project show that the establishment of online loans should obtain a business license from the OJK in accordance with the provisions of Article 8 of POJK Number 10 of 2022. Cash Maju is an illegal lending and borrowing application and can be subject to PMH in Article 1365 of the Civil Code. The agreement between Cash Maju and debtor Asep Sunandar is an invalid agreement because it violates the fourth condition of 1320 of the Civil Code. Cash Maju's action of disseminating Asep Sunandar's personal data is defamation as stated in Article 27 of the ITE Law so that Asep Sunandar gets legal protection from the ITE Law.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Yuridis Tentang Pencemaran Nama Baik : Studi Kasus Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan ]]>
<![CDATA[Stevanno Sebastian Entoh]]>;
<![CDATA[Sari Mandiana]]>;
<![CDATA[Jusup Jacobus Setyabudhi]]>
<![CDATA[ Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): April : Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v1i2.146
<![CDATA[This research discusses the defamation that has been committed by Haris Azhar (HA) and Fatiah Maulidyianti (FM) who in one of their YouTube video uploads entitled 'There is a Lord Luhut Behind the Economic-OPS Military Relations of Intan Jaya!!! General BIN Also There!! NgeHAMtam' has defamed and caused false suspicion against Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan. It is known that HA and FM called Luhut 'lord'. Luhut also said that material losses do not need to be calculated, but morally, accusing me of being a criminal and being called a 'lord' is very detrimental to him and his family. This research will also discuss the defamation by Haris and Fatiah when viewed from the Criminal Code (KUHP), and Law Number 11 of 2008 which has been amended by Law Number 19 of 2016. This research uses normative / dogmatic juridical research methods. This research uses primary legal materials and secondary legal materials as the legal basis for completing this research. This research also uses the Statue Approach (approach through legislation), Conceptual Approach (conceptual approach), and Case Approach (case approach). In the results of this study, it can be concluded that the actions of HA and FM can be categorized as defamation because they have fulfilled the elements of Article 311 of the Criminal Code on slander and Article 318 of the Criminal Code on false suspicion. The advice in the form of legal opinion is that the prosecutor should be able to provide charges to HA and FM related to Article 311 of the Criminal Code on slander and Article 318 on false pretenses because this can later become the basis for the Judge's decision following the prosecutor's indictment.]]>
