Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.066
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum JUSTISI QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Science and Education Journal Ipso Jure
Tri Setiady
Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of Criminal Liability for Perpetrators of Persecution Based on Criminal Theory (Study of Decision Number 96/Pid.B/2018/PN.Kwg) Rikal Lesmana; Ade Maman; Tri Setiady
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 12 (2025): Ipso Jure - January
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/bkravr35

Abstract

This study examines criminal liability and judicial considerations in cases of persecution in Indonesia, focusing on Decision Number 96/Pid.B/2018/PN.Kwg. Using a normative juridical approach, it analyzes relevant legal provisions, particularly Articles 49 and 351 of the Indonesian Criminal Code. The case involves Nurhidayat, who assaulted the victim, Fahrul, during a dispute over motorcycle credit repayment. The research investigates the form of criminal responsibility for the crime of persecution and the judge's reasoning in sentencing the defendant. The findings show that the Karawang District Court's decision did not fully align with justice and legal certainty principles. Nurhidayat was sentenced to three years in prison, despite mitigating factors such as his remorse, cooperative attitude, and role as the family’s breadwinner. The study concludes that the court’s decision did not adequately consider the juridical and non-juridical aspects, resulting in a sense of injustice for both the victim and the defendant. This research recommends that judges, when determining sanctions, should consider the proportionality of the crime and account for all aspects of justice. This would ensure that decisions better reflect fairness and provide clearer legal certainty, aligning with the principles of justice, legal certainty, and the protection of citizens' rights in the criminal justice system.
Criminological Review of Premeditated Murder Perpetrators (Based on Personality Theory: Case of KH. Mochamad Tarma Hantono, Karawang) Triadi Tiawardana; Ade Maman`; Tri Setiady
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 12 (2025): Ipso Jure - January
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/5njvyb31

Abstract

This paper discusses the criminological review of premeditated murder perpetrators based on personality characteristic theory, focusing on the case of KH. Mochamad Tarma Hantono and associates in Karawang. The study aims to explore the factors that lead individuals to commit premeditated murder in connection with personality theory and to analyze the criminal liability of the perpetrators. The research adopts a normative juridical method, utilizing literature and secondary data to examine relevant regulations and scholarly works. The study finds that factors influencing the commission of premeditated murder can be categorized into internal and external elements. Internal factors include motivation, urgency, economic needs, intelligence, age, and gender. External factors involve education, social environment, employment, and community security vulnerabilities. These aspects are examined through Article 340 of the Criminal Code, which stipulates penalties for premeditated murder, such as the death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment for up to 20 years. The analysis reveals that personality characteristics, including structural and dynamic differences between criminals and non-criminals, play a significant role in understanding premeditated murder. Additionally, criminal psychological theories suggest the importance of behavioral prediction and the distinction among various types of criminals. The research concludes that premeditated murder is influenced by a combination of personality traits and external factors, and perpetrators are legally accountable under the provisions of criminal law.
Optimizing the Intellectual Property Rights as Banking Credit Collateral by Art Workers in Karawang Tri Setiady; R. Siti Sumartini; Meita Fadhilah; Erdin Tahir
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.5741

Abstract

As proprietors of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), creative professionals (designers, creators, and inventors) in Karawang regency own exclusive rights that enable them to independently profit from their works in the form of royalties or licensing. However, in reality, they have difficulties in accessing capital needed to expand their business. Some financial institutions might not accept IPR as collateral for credit even though the law principally states that they are valuable assets and therefore eligible as collateral. Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014 (Article 16) and Patent Law No. 13 of 2016 (Article 108) both permit owners and holders of intellectual property rights to utilize such rights as collateral for loans under a fiduciary arrangement. The laws should apply to copyrights and patents, but so far they haven't, which is a shame because in theory they should. The lack of a change to Article 43 of BI Regulation Number 14/15/PBI/2012, which pertains to the forms of credit collateral, makes it difficult to use intellectual property rights as security for loans. To make the concept relevant, the regulation has to be changed
Reconceptualizing Legal Protection for Drug Addicts: A Restorative Justice Perspective in Indonesia Diovanni Nurfuzi Sari Hendona; Ade Maman Suherman; Indra Yudha Koswara; Tri Setiady; Wiwin Triyunarti
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i2.5132

Abstract

This study aims to analyze legal protections for drug addicts and to examine the relevance of applying restorative justice within the Indonesian criminal justice system, particularly in recognizing addicts as legal subjects who possess a dual role as both perpetrators and victims. The methods employed are normative legal analysis using statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, analyzed qualitatively through primary legal sources, court rulings, and relevant academic literature. The novelty of this study lies in the development of an integrated analytical model that combines legal protection theory, victimology, and the principles of restorative and rehabilitative justice, while formulating a regulatory harmonization model that positions drug addicts as subjects of legal protection within narcotics policy. The findings indicate that the legal status of drug users within Indonesia’s criminal justice system remains ambiguous, leading to the dominance of a repressive approach that conflicts with the principle of rehabilitation. The normative inconsistency between Articles 54 and 103 and the criminalization provisions in Article 127 of Law No. 35 of 2009, as well as the disharmony with criminal procedure law and the internal policies of law enforcement agencies, creates legal uncertainty in practice. The conclusions of this study affirm that regulatory reform is needed, oriented toward strengthening rehabilitation as a right of drug users, strengthening rehabilitation institutions, reducing social stigma, and optimizing restorative justice approaches to realize a criminal justice system that is more just, humane, and sustainable.
Peranan Hukum Dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Melalui Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investasi dan Kemudahan Berusaha di Indonesia Pasca Undang Undang Cipta Kerja Aceng Dadi Firmansyah; Tri Setiady
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v5i1.8627

Abstract

Pembangunan ekonomi merupakan salah satu tujuan utama negara dalam mewujudkan kesejahteraan masyarakat sebagaimana diamanatkan dalam Pembukaan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Dalam upaya mencapai tujuan tersebut, hukum memiliki peran strategis sebagai instrumen pembangunan yang mampu menciptakan kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan bagi seluruh pelaku ekonomi. Salah satu bentuk kebijakan pemerintah dalam mendorong pembangunan ekonomi adalah melalui pembentukan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang. Regulasi ini bertujuan menciptakan kemudahan berusaha, meningkatkan investasi, memperluas lapangan kerja, serta meningkatkan daya saing nasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peranan hukum dalam pembangunan ekonomi melalui perlindungan hukum terhadap investasi dan kemudahan berusaha di Indonesia pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum memiliki fungsi penting sebagai sarana rekayasa sosial, instrumen perlindungan investasi, dan alat pencipta kepastian hukum bagi pelaku usaha. Meskipun demikian, implementasi berbagai regulasi masih menghadapi kendala berupa tumpang tindih peraturan, birokrasi yang belum sepenuhnya efektif, serta perbedaan interpretasi antara pemerintah pusat dan daerah. Oleh karena itu diperlukan harmonisasi regulasi, peningkatan kualitas pelayanan publik, serta penguatan pengawasan guna mewujudkan pembangunan ekonomi yang berkelanjutan.
Keadilan Dan Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Penerapan Prinsip First To File Dalam Pendaftaran Merek Asing Arc’teryx Di Indonesia Muhamad Rifki Nurrasman; Ahmad Hamdani; Muhamad Radjhu Khan; Audry Salsabila Pasaribu; Tri Setiady; Rani Apriani
Science and Education Journal (SICEDU) Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Science and Education Journal 2026
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/sicedu.v5i2.551

Abstract

Perlindungan merek memiliki fungsi penting dalam menjaga kelangsungan usaha, mencegah persaingan tidak sehat, serta mempertahankan reputasi dan nilai komersial produk. Dalam sistem hukum Indonesia yang bersifat konstitutif, hak atas merek lahir melalui pendaftaran berdasarkan prinsip first to file, yaitu diberikan kepada pihak yang lebih dahulu mengajukan permohonan. Karena itu, pendaftaran menjadi syarat utama untuk memperoleh hak eksklusif atas merek. Penelitian ini mengkaji penerapan prinsip tersebut dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, khususnya dikaitkan dengan sengketa merek Arc’teryx di Indonesia. Dengan metode yuridis normatif, penelitian ini menelaah peraturan, literatur, dan kronologi perkara. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa prinsip first to file memberi kepastian hukum formal melalui sertifikat, hak penggunaan, larangan bagi pihak lain, dan prosedur administratif yang jelas. Namun, secara substantif, prinsip ini masih rentan disalahgunakan oleh pendaftar beriktikad tidak baik, sehingga pemilik asli harus menempuh gugatan pembatalan yang memerlukan waktu dan biaya.
Co-Authors Aceng Dadi Firmansyah Ade Maman Ade Maman Suherman Ade Maman` Ahmad Hamdani Audry Salsabila Pasaribu Diovanni Nurfuzi Sari Hendona Erdin Tahir Koswara, Indra Yudha Meita Fadhilah Muhamad Radjhu Khan Muhamad Rifki Nurrasman R. Siti Sumartini Rani Apriani Rikal Lesmana Triadi Tiawardana Wiwin Triyunarti