St. Haniah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERAN GURU DALAM MENGINTEGRASIKAN NILAI-NILAI BUDAYA LOKAL PADA PEMBELAJARAN IPS DI SEKOLAH DASAR NEGERI 138 BASOKENG KABUPATEN BULUKUMBA St. Haniah; Firdaus; Sulvahrul Amin
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 9 No. 04 (2024): Volume 09 No. 04 Desember 2024 Press
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v9i04.21385

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh semakin terkikisnya nilai-nilai budaya lokal di kalangan generasi muda akibat pengaruh globalisasi. Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial (IPS) di tingkat sekolah dasar menjadi salah satu upaya strategis untuk melestarikan nilai-nilai budaya lokal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran guru dalam mengintegrasikan nilai-nilai budaya lokal pada pembelajaran IPS di Sekolah Dasar Negeri 138 Basokeng, Kabupaten Bulukumba. Metodologi penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan pengumpulan data melalui wawancara, observasi, dan analisis dokumen. Subjek penelitian meliputi guru, siswa, dan kepala sekolah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa guru memainkan peran penting dalam menyusun materi ajar berbasis budaya lokal, menerapkan metode pembelajaran yang relevan dengan konteks budaya, serta menjadi teladan dalam mengamalkan nilai-nilai budaya lokal. Namun, penelitian ini juga menemukan beberapa kendala, seperti keterbatasan sumber belajar berbasis budaya lokal, minimnya pelatihan guru, dan kurangnya dukungan infrastruktur sekolah. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pelibatan komunitas lokal, pengembangan kurikulum yang adaptif terhadap budaya lokal, serta pelatihan intensif bagi guru untuk meningkatkan efektivitas integrasi budaya lokal dalam pembelajaran IPS
Electoral compliance and cultural hegemony: The political economy of elite power in Indonesia’s village governance M Ridwan Said Ahmad; Jamaluddin Arifin; St. Haniah; Ibrahim Arifin; Risfaisal
Harmoni Sosial: Jurnal Pendidikan IPS Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/hsjpi.v13i1.94660

Abstract

Decentralization policies in Indonesia, particularly in Bone Regency, South Sulawesi Province, are often based on the assumption that decentralizing power will destroy traditional hierarchies and promote inclusive governance. However, this study challenges this optimistic view, arguing that without adequate social mechanisms, electoral mechanisms can paradoxically reinforce existing power structures rather than disrupt them. Using political contestation in the Pude Village Head Election as a critical case study, this study analyzes the resilience of feudalism within the framework of modern procedural democracy. Relying on extensive qualitative research, including in-depth interviews and observations of electoral maneuvers, the study explains how “elite fusion” distorts the democratic process. In Pude, local elites represent a powerful intersection of aristocrats, businesspeople, and religious leaders who collaborate to monopolize influence. Analysis shows that these actors exploit deep-rooted cultural doctrines not merely as tradition, but as a hegemonic tool to ensure political compliance. Consequently, patron-client relationships are manipulated to transform voting into an act of cultural obedience rather than rational political choice. Findings reveal that feudal power creates a severe democratic deficit, marked by low transparency, marginalization of non-elite voices, and suppression of genuine contestation. Theoretically, this research expands the literature on “elite capture” and neopatrimonialism by showing that cultural legitimacy is a form of political capital as powerful as economic resources in maintaining dynastic control. The study concludes that institutional reform alone is insufficient to advance substantive democracy; true democratization requires deconstructing feudal dependencies that render citizens subjects rather than empowered voters.