Khoirun Nidhom
Institut Daarul Qur’an Jakarta

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Human trafficking in the Qur'an: An Analysis of Sheikh Nawawi al-Bantani's Interpretation in Tafsir Marah Labid Yusi Fadhilah Ananda; Ida Kurnia Shofa; Khoirun Nidhom
JIA (Jurnal Ilmu Agama) Vol 26 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Agama : Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, dan Fenomena Agama
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Pemikiran Islam Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/jia.v26i1.28380

Abstract

Human trafficking is a form of modern slavery, involving the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring, or receipt of a person under the threat of violence, for the purpose of exploitation. The phenomenon of human trafficking, particularly of women and children, is not a new phenomenon that has emerged recently, but has existed since before the advent of Islam. In the Qur'an, human trafficking is not mentioned specifically, but there are several verses that indirectly or conceptually describe the practice of human trafficking. The verses of the Qur'an that describe this are QS. An-Nur: 33 and QS. Yusuf: 19-20. To explain these verses and delve deeper into human trafficking in the Qur'an, this study uses the book Tafsir Marah Labid by Sheikh Nawawi Al-Bantani. Based on this, the main issues in this paper are: how does Sheikh Nawawi Al-Bantani interpret QS. an-Nur: 33 and QS. Yusuf: 19-20, which address the issue of human trafficking, and how relevant it is? The objective of this study is to discuss human trafficking in the Tafsir Marah Labid by Syekh Nawawi Al-Bantani and how relevant his interpretation is to the issue of human trafficking in the present day. This research is a library research using the Tafsir Maudhu'i conseptual research method, based on Tafsir Marah Labid as the primary data source and other books and journals as secondary data sources. The data collection technique uses descriptive-analytical data analysis. The results of this research indicate that in QS. An-Nur: 33, Sheikh Nawawi strongly condemns the practice of forcing female slaves into prostitution, which is relevant to the contemporary phenomena of sexual exploitation and human trafficking. Meanwhile, in QS. Yusuf: 19–20, he highlights the sale of Prophet Yusuf as a concrete form of oppression and the commercialization of humans, which is highly contextual to modern human trafficking practices that treat humans as commodities.
ANALISIS QIRA’AT ABU ‘AMR RIWAYAT AS-SUSI QS. AL-AHZAB DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP PENAFSIRAN: (Studi Kitab At-Taisir fii Al-Qira’at Sab’ah) Fadwa Nadia Sholeha; Khoirun Nidhom; Mohamad Mualim
QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies, Desember 2026
Publisher : ASIAN PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58738/qanun.v5i2.1744

Abstract

Variasi qira’at memiliki keterkaitan penting dengan penafsiran Al-Qur’an karena perbedaan bacaan pada ayat tertentu dapat menghasilkan perbedaan nuansa makna dan pemahaman tafsir. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis bentuk-bentuk perbedaan qira’at Abu ‘Amr riwayat as-Susi dalam QS. Al-Ahzab berdasarkan Kitab At-Taisir fi al-Qira’at al-Sab’ serta mengidentifikasi implikasinya terhadap penafsiran ayat. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kepustakaan (library research) dengan Kitab At-Taisir fi al-Qira’at al-Sab’ sebagai sumber primer dan sejumlah kitab tafsir sebagai sumber pendukung. Data dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis isi (content analysis). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya 83 perbedaan bacaan antara qira’at Abu ‘Amr riwayat as-Susi dan riwayat Hafs dalam QS. Al-Ahzab. Sebagian besar perbedaan tersebut berupa kaidah ushul qira’at, seperti idgham kabir, ibdal hamzah, dan tashil, yang tidak berimplikasi terhadap perubahan makna. Namun, terdapat tiga ayat yang menunjukkan implikasi penafsiran, yaitu ayat 30, 33, dan 52. Pada ayat 30, variasi bacaan menghasilkan perbedaan pemahaman mengenai kadar pelipatan azab bagi istri-istri Nabi; pada ayat 33, memberikan nuansa antara perintah menetap di rumah dan menjaga ketenangan, kewibawaan, serta kehormatan; sedangkan pada ayat 52, memengaruhi pemahaman mengenai cakupan perempuan yang termasuk dalam larangan menikah bagi Nabi Muhammad SAW. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa perbedaan qira’at tidak selalu berimplikasi terhadap perubahan makna atau hukum, tetapi pada ayat tertentu dapat memperluas perspektif penafsiran. Penelitian ini berkontribusi dalam memperjelas posisi qira’at Abu ‘Amr riwayat as-Susi sebagai salah satu sumber penting dalam memahami keragaman linguistik dan interpretatif Al-Qur’an.
Reconfiguring Qur'anic Intertextuality: Mun'im Sirry's Cross-References, Munāsabah, and Tafsīr Al-Qurʾān bi Al-Qurʾān Afni Azzahra; Ida Kurnia Shofa; Khoirun Nidhom; Gilang Gymnastiar
Jurnal Fuaduna : Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/fuaduna.v10i1.11181

Abstract

This article examines Mun'im Sirry's concept of cross-references in The Qur'an with Cross-References within the broader framework of Qur'anic intertextuality. While cross-referencing has been presented as a contemporary approach to reading the Qur'an, its relationship to the classical concepts of munāsabah and tafsīr al-Qurʾān bi al-Qurʾān (TQbQ) remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to analyze the conceptual foundations, methodological characteristics, and distinctive features of Sirry's approach in comparison with these two established exegetical traditions. Employing library research with a comparative descriptive design, the study applies qualitative content analysis to Sirry's The Qur'an with Cross-References, classical works on ʿulūm al-Qurʾān, and relevant contemporary scholarship. Sūrat al-Fātiḥah serves as the primary analytical sample because of its foundational position in the muṣḥaf. The findings demonstrate that the three approaches share the same premise of Qur'anic intertextuality but differ in their interpretive orientation. Munāsabah emphasizes textual coherence, TQbQ explains one verse through another, whereas Sirry's cross-references organize thematic connections through a practical system of marginal annotations. The analysis also shows that Sirry's selection of cross-references is interpretive rather than exhaustive, reflecting specific editorial criteria. This study concludes that Sirry's cross-references represent a contemporary reconfiguration of the classical TQbQ tradition, offering greater accessibility while remaining selective in coverage and methodological transparency.