Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Juridical Review Regarding Cases of Corruption in Social Assistance Funds during the Covid-19 Pandemic Kelly Chandra Puspita Halim; Marshanda Btari Sukmara; Mochammad Ridho Nasrullah; Shefira Amalia Choirunnisa
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol 2, No 1 (2023): June 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v2i1.473

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic that has hit the world has had a major impact on the country's economy. Indonesia is one of many countries that are trying to restore economic conditions by holding government programs such as social assistance. However, the program was misused by Juliari P. Batubara as an official of the Minister of Social Affairs who committed the criminal act of corruption in aid funds for personal use. Therefore, these actions are very detrimental and must be held criminally accountable for the perpetrators in order to provide a deterrent effect. The results of this study are that the death penalty is appropriate for those who are not responsible for using social assistance funds belonging to underprivileged people. In the writing that we make, this writing is motivated by Pancasila and the Law. So have the authorities carried out the appropriate punishment for the perpetrators? This act has been regulated in Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. This research uses a normative method which is carried out by examining library materials or secondary data.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum atas Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas serta Tinjauan Kealpaan sebagai Faktor Penyebabnya Muhamad Najib Hilal Haadii; Mochammad Ridho Nasrullah; Marshanda Btari Sukmara; Andryawan Andryawan
Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanities Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Februari 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/helium.v2i1.4699

Abstract

Kecelakaan lalu lintas menjadi isu signifikan yang mempengaruhi keselamatan pengguna jalan dan menimbulkan dampak hukum, baik pidana maupun perdata. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk pertanggungjawaban hukum atas kecelakaan lalu lintas, serta mengidentifikasi kategori kealpaan yang berkontribusi terhadap kejadian tersebut. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, studi ini mengkaji peraturan perundang-undangan seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan serta Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertanggungjawaban hukum mencakup aspek pidana dan perdata, bergantung pada tingkat kelalaian pengemudi. Kasus kecelakaan truk di Cipondoh, Tangerang, mengilustrasikan bagaimana kelalaian berat (culpa lata) seperti pengemudi tanpa SIM dan dalam pengaruh narkoba dapat dikenai sanksi pidana sesuai Pasal 310 UU LLAJ. Selain itu, korban memiliki hak untuk menuntut ganti rugi sesuai Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata. Studi ini menegaskan pentingnya kesadaran hukum, pengawasan terhadap kondisi kendaraan, dan kepatuhan terhadap peraturan untuk mengurangi angka kecelakaan lalu lintas.
Juridical Review Regarding Cases of Corruption in Social Assistance Funds during the Covid-19 Pandemic Kelly Chandra Puspita Halim; Marshanda Btari Sukmara; Mochammad Ridho Nasrullah; Shefira Amalia Choirunnisa
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): June 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v2i1.473

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic that has hit the world has had a major impact on the country's economy. Indonesia is one of many countries that are trying to restore economic conditions by holding government programs such as social assistance. However, the program was misused by Juliari P. Batubara as an official of the Minister of Social Affairs who committed the criminal act of corruption in aid funds for personal use. Therefore, these actions are very detrimental and must be held criminally accountable for the perpetrators in order to provide a deterrent effect. The results of this study are that the death penalty is appropriate for those who are not responsible for using social assistance funds belonging to underprivileged people. In the writing that we make, this writing is motivated by Pancasila and the Law. So have the authorities carried out the appropriate punishment for the perpetrators? This act has been regulated in Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. This research uses a normative method which is carried out by examining library materials or secondary data.