Dyah Ayu Ratnaningtyas, Dyah Ayu
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

PENGARUH KESIAPAN BELAJAR, MOTIVASI BELAJAR, FASILITAS BELAJAR DAN LINGKUNGAN TEMAN SEBAYA TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN MENGETIK MAHASISWA PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN ADMINISTRASI PERKANTORAN FAKULTAS EKONOMI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SEMARANG Ratnaningtyas, Dyah Ayu
Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2014): Economic Education Analysis Journal
Publisher : Department of Economics Education, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui adakah pengaruh kesiapan belajar, motivasi belajar, fasilitas belajar dan lingkungan teman sebaya terhadap keterampilan mengetik mahasiswa Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran secara simultan maupun parsial. Populasi yang diteliti dalam penelitian ini merupakan mahasiswa Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran angkatan tahun 2011 yang telah mengikuti mata kuliah mengetik manual I, mengetik manual II dan mengetik elektronik sebanyak 115 orang. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara kuesioner, tes dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan analisis regresi berganda. Hasil dari analisis regresi ganda penelitian ini yaitu Y = -1.047 + 0.037X1 +0.106X2 + 0.055X3 + 0.093X4. Ada pengaruh secara simultan sebesar 70.6%, sedangkan pengaruh secara parsial kesiapan belajar sebesar 4.162%, motivasi belajar sebesar 16%, fasilitas belajar sebesar 10.3%, dan lingkungan teman sebaya sebesar 11.9%. The purpose of this research is to find out whether is there any influence of readiness to learn, learning motivation, learning facilities and peers environment towards students of office administration either simultaneously or partially. The population in this research is 115 students of office administration year 2011 who have finished their study on manual typing I, manual typing II and electronic typing. The data was collected using questioner, test and documentations. The data analysis technique used in this research was descriptive analysis and multiple regression analysis. The result of the multiple regression analysis is Y = -1.047 + 0.037  + 0.106   + 0.055  + 0.093 . There is a simultaneous influence as much as 70.6%, whereas partially the influence of readiness to learn as much as 4.162%, learning motivation 16%, learning facilities 10.3% and peers environment 11.9%.
PENGARUH KESIAPAN BELAJAR, MOTIVASI BELAJAR, FASILITAS BELAJAR DAN LINGKUNGAN TEMAN SEBAYA TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN MENGETIK MAHASISWA PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN ADMINISTRASI PERKANTORAN FAKULTAS EKONOMI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SEMARANG Ratnaningtyas, Dyah Ayu
Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2014): Economic Education Analysis Journal
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui adakah pengaruh kesiapan belajar, motivasi belajar, fasilitas belajar dan lingkungan teman sebaya terhadap keterampilan mengetik mahasiswa Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran secara simultan maupun parsial. Populasi yang diteliti dalam penelitian ini merupakan mahasiswa Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran angkatan tahun 2011 yang telah mengikuti mata kuliah mengetik manual I, mengetik manual II dan mengetik elektronik sebanyak 115 orang. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara kuesioner, tes dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan analisis regresi berganda. Hasil dari analisis regresi ganda penelitian ini yaitu Y = -1.047 + 0.037X1 +0.106X2 + 0.055X3 + 0.093X4. Ada pengaruh secara simultan sebesar 70.6%, sedangkan pengaruh secara parsial kesiapan belajar sebesar 4.162%, motivasi belajar sebesar 16%, fasilitas belajar sebesar 10.3%, dan lingkungan teman sebaya sebesar 11.9%. The purpose of this research is to find out whether is there any influence of readiness to learn, learning motivation, learning facilities and peers environment towards students of office administration either simultaneously or partially. The population in this research is 115 students of office administration year 2011 who have finished their study on manual typing I, manual typing II and electronic typing. The data was collected using questioner, test and documentations. The data analysis technique used in this research was descriptive analysis and multiple regression analysis. The result of the multiple regression analysis is Y = -1.047 + 0.037  + 0.106   + 0.055  + 0.093 . There is a simultaneous influence as much as 70.6%, whereas partially the influence of readiness to learn as much as 4.162%, learning motivation 16%, learning facilities 10.3% and peers environment 11.9%.
Management of the preparation of student learning outcomes assessment instruments Maula, Rohmatul; Ismiyati, Ismiyati; Ratnaningtyas, Dyah Ayu; Abdillah, Zuhdan Kamal
Measurement In Educational Research Vol 3, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Research and Social Study Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33292/meter.v3i2.263

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine more deeply the procedure for preparing student learning outcomes assessment instruments on archival management elements at SMK Negeri 9 Semarang in accordance with the mechanism for implementing the independent curriculum. The method used in this study is descriptive qualitative. Data analysis is carried out by collecting data, condensing data, presenting data, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that the preparation of assessment instruments had been carried out in terms of planning, organizing, actuating, and controlling. In planning, teachers develop learning tools and types of assessments to be used. On organizing, teachers make a cooperation, division of labor, and designing forms of assessment. In actuating, teachers do not compile assessment grids, but compile worksheets and assessment rubrics. In addition, the teacher only conducts qualitative analysis of question items. In controlling, teachers set criteria for achieving learning outcomes that refer to the criteria for achieving learning objectives. The conclusion of this study is that the preparation of learning outcome assessment instruments in terms of the planning, organizing, actuating, and controlling stages has been carried out in accordance with the mechanism for implementing the independent curriculum.
Management of the preparation of student learning outcomes assessment instruments Maula, Rohmatul; Ismiyati, Ismiyati; Ratnaningtyas, Dyah Ayu; Abdillah, Zuhdan Kamal
Measurement In Educational Research Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Research and Social Study Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33292/meter.v3i2.263

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine more deeply the procedure for preparing student learning outcomes assessment instruments on archival management elements at SMK Negeri 9 Semarang in accordance with the mechanism for implementing the independent curriculum. The method used in this study is descriptive qualitative. Data analysis is carried out by collecting data, condensing data, presenting data, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that the preparation of assessment instruments had been carried out in terms of planning, organizing, actuating, and controlling. In planning, teachers develop learning tools and types of assessments to be used. On organizing, teachers make a cooperation, division of labor, and designing forms of assessment. In actuating, teachers do not compile assessment grids, but compile worksheets and assessment rubrics. In addition, the teacher only conducts qualitative analysis of question items. In controlling, teachers set criteria for achieving learning outcomes that refer to the criteria for achieving learning objectives. The conclusion of this study is that the preparation of learning outcome assessment instruments in terms of the planning, organizing, actuating, and controlling stages has been carried out in accordance with the mechanism for implementing the independent curriculum.