Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurisprudentie Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Gerechtigheid Law Journal
Darojatun Andara
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Muhammadiyah Microfinance Institutions After the Enactment of Law No.1 of 2013 Concerning Microfinance Institutions Darojatun Andara; M Hafidz Sidqi A
Gerechtiheid Law Journal Vol 2 No 2 (2021): Gerechtigheid Law Journal
Publisher : Research institutions and community service Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (281.864 KB) | DOI: 10.35326/gerechtiheid.v2i2.2232

Abstract

Law Number 1 of 2013 concerning Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) In the transitional provisions of Article 39 Paragraphs (1) and (2) of Law No.1 of 2013 concerning MFIs. it is stated that Baitut Tamwil Muhammadiyah (BTM) is a Microfinance Institution and is required to become an MFI by registering with the OJK. While the Microfinance Institutions owned by Muhammadiyah are not all named Baitut Tamwil Muhammadiyah (BTM) and the legal entity used is a Cooperative and is in the form of KSPPS whose legal basis is Law Number 25 of 1992 concerning Cooperatives and Permenkop and UKM Number 02/2017 concerning Amendments to Permenkop Number 15/2015 concerning Savings and Loans Business and Sharia Financing by Cooperatives.This study aims (1) to find out how the position of the Muhammadiyah Microfinance Institution in the 2 (two) laws and regulations governing the form of cooperatives and (2) to determine the factors that influence the selection of the form of business entity. This research is a normative juridical research. So this research was conducted in libraries by examining primary and secondary materials, as well as interviews with resource persons, in order to support or become additional secondary materials.The results of this study indicate (1) that the position of BTM and LKM Muhammadiyah is legally valid as long as it is subject to the Cooperative Law. Because BTM and LKM Muhammadiyah chose the Cooperative Law and the KSPPS Cooperative Government as their legal basis. However, the obligation to register with the OJK as an LKMS under the MFI Law remains in effect until the rules are revoked or revised. (2) Factors influencing the selection of a Muhammadiyah MFI business entity, either LKMS or KSPPS.
LPSK Integration At The Investigation Stage In Fulfilling The Rights Of Victims Of Sexual Violence Muh Sutri Mansyah; Edy Nurcahyo; Kaswandi; Hasirudin Hasri; Hayun; Darojatun Andara; Muh. Ramlan; Sambar
Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): JUNE
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v8i2.5265

Abstract

Fulfilling the rights of victims of criminal sexual violence is very important, starting from procedural rights, medical rights, psychological rights, and physical protection, but is often forgotten by law enforcement officials. This research will analyze the LPSK integration model at the investigation stage in fulfilling the rights of victims of criminal sexual violence. This research uses normative juridical, legislative research approaches, primary legal materials on the Witness and Victim Protection Law, the Sexual Violence Crime Law. Secondary legal materials, journals, books and other references that have relevance to this research. The analysis technique used is descriptive analytical, the interpretation used is systematic and grammatical. The results of the research state that the LPSK integration model at the investigation stage has been regulated in Article 43 of the Sexual Violence Law, within 1 x 24 (one time twenty four) hours from the granting of temporary protection, the investigator is obliged to submit a request for protection to the LPSK. However, problems arise if the investigator does not apply for protection or ignores these legal obligations. This creates a legal vacuum. Future suggestions for the government and law enforcement agencies need to align perceptions regarding the protection of victims of sexual violence and the involvement of LPSK in the criminal justice system. In this way, it is hoped that the rights of victims can be fulfilled.
Perlindungan Data Korban Kekerasan Seksual dalam Sistem Informasi Pelacakan Perkara Pengadilan: Bahasa Indonesia Mansyah, Muh Sutri; Kaswandi; Hasirudin Hasri; Hayun; Rasmala Dewi; Darojatun Andara; Edy Nurcahyo
Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Volume 11 Nomor 1 Juni 2024
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum uin alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v11i1.46451

Abstract

The Case Tracking Information System is a system established by the Supreme Court which functions to track a case. However, in reality, it has been found that sensitive information regarding victims of sexual violence, such as names that should be kept confidential, is disclosed. The purpose of this research is to examine and evaluate the case tracking information system regarding data on child victims and to develop an ideal model for protecting the data of victims of sexual violence within the case tracking information system. The research method used is normative juridical research with a case approach, statutory regulations, and conceptual approaches. The research findings indicate that five laws (the Witness and Victim Protection Law, the Sexual Violence Crime Law, the Personal Data Protection Law, the Juvenile Justice System Law, and the Child Protection Law) regulate the confidentiality of victims to prioritize the best interests of children as the nation's future generation. However, in reality, it has been found that some courts, such as the Baubau District Court, display information such as the victim's name, while the Pasarwajo District Court in SIPP only displays the victim's data in the form of a pseudonym, namely a child witness.
Co-Authors Edy Nurcahyo Hasirudin Hasri Hayun Kaswandi M Hafidz Sidqi A Muh Sutri Mansyah Muh. Ramlan Rasmala Dewi Sambar