Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Judiciary ( Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan )
tengku dwi gita cahyani
universitas sumatera utara
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ALTERNATIF SEBAGAI SALAH SATU PILIHAN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DAGANG INTERNASIONAL tengku dwi gita cahyani; m. hadyan yunhas purba
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 21, No 1 (2023): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v21i1.3775

Abstract

ABSTRACTDisputes are a common thing to happen, so the settlement must also benefit both parties. Alternative dispute resolution or Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is an option in solving the problems of the parties in the field of international trade. This settlement is carried out by means of choice of law and choice of jurisdiction which is stated in the contract clause. Prior to the arbitration stage, dispute resolution begins with negotiations first. However, the implementation of the execution is a bit difficult, because sometimes some parties do not want to carry out the award from the arbitration, so it is quite time-consuming and labor-intensive to return the matter to court. For this reason, when making contract clauses, there must be self-awareness to carry out decisions if a dispute does occur in international trade. As an example of alternative dispute resolution by Indonesia is regarding the Indonesia-Japan National Car Dispute, the point of the problem is where Japan feels that Indonesia is doing injustice to the automotive industry which at that time cut the cost of tax duties for national cars, even though Japan has a large target market in Indonesia. in the automotive case, this lawsuit was brought to International Arbitration and the lawsuit was won by Japan. Furthermore, it is explained how the procedure for resolving disputes and how alternative dispute resolution is an option in resolving international trade disputes. The research method in this journal uses a normative juridical qualitative method that conducts research on existing theories.Keywords: Disputes, International Trade, Arbitration
PENDEKATAN RULE OF REASON TERHADAP PRAKTIK JUAL RUGI DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG INDONESIA Tengku Dwi Gita Cahyani; Syamsul Rizal; Aflah Aflah
Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan Vol. 14 Issue 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55499/judiciary.v14i1.264

Abstract

Jual rugi (predatory pricing) merupakan salah satu bentuk persaingan usaha tidak sehat yang diatur secara tegas dalam Pasal 20 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, dengan sejumlah unsur yang harus terpenuhi, yaitu unsur pelaku usaha, unsur pemasokan barang dan/atau jasa, unsur jual rugi atau penetapan harga sangat rendah, unsur maksud menyingkirkan pesaing, unsur pasar bersangkutan, serta unsur terjadinya praktik monopoli. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif untuk mengkaji bagaimana pendekatan rule of reason diterapkan dalam menilai praktik jual rugi, dengan menjadikan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 951 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021 terkait PT. Conch South Kalimantan Cement sebagai studi kasus. Analisis ini menelusuri penerapan rule of reason secara berjenjang, mulai dari Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha, Pengadilan Niaga, hingga Mahkamah Agung, yang secara konsisten menguatkan adanya pelanggaran, meskipun UU Antimonopoli belum memberikan batasan kuantitatif yang jelas mengenai jual rugi. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan agar KPPU menyusun pedoman teknis mengenai ambang batas biaya serta kerangka analisis yang seragam bagi ahli hukum dan ahli ekonomi guna memperkuat kepastian hukum.
Co-Authors Aflah, Aflah M Hadyan Yunhas Purba Syamsul Rizal