Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Efforts To Overcome Criminal Acts By Rokan Hulu Resort Police M Musa; Inna Widya Saputri; Heni Susanti; Yusramizza Md Isa; Evi Yanti
Proceeding International Conference on Malay Identity Vol. 1 (2020): Desember 2020
Publisher : Jurusan Sejarah, Seni, dan Arkeologi, FKIP, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this research is to be able to find out what are the Efforts to Overcome Criminal Acts of Obscenity by the Rokan Hulu Resort Police. This research is included in the category of empirical legal research which obtains data by conducting direct observations and surveys in the field to obtain primary data obtained through interviews. The nature of this research is included in the descriptive. Efforts to deal with criminal acts of sexual abuse of children in Rokan Hulu are in the form of pre-emptive, preventive, and repressive measures. Preventive efforts made by law enforcers aiming to prevent the possibility of sexual abuse against children are in the form of appeals and outreach to the public about the crime of sexual abuse. Also, repressive efforts made by law enforcement and other institutions, the efforts made aim to provide harmony that has been disrupted or a deterrent effect for committing a crime, especially sexual abuse of children by imposing sanctions in accordance with the violations committed. Keywords: Prevention efforts, Obscene crime, Police Abstrak Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk dapat mengetahui apa yang menjadi Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perbuatan Cabul Oleh Kepolisian Resor Rokan Hulu. Penelitian ini termasuk ke dalam kategori penelitian hukum empiris yang memperoleh data dengan cara melakukan observasi dan survei secara langsung ke lapangan untuk mendapatkan data primer yang didapat melalui wawancara. Sifat penelitian ini termasuk ke dalam deskriptif. Upaya penanggulangan tindak pidana pencabulan terhadap anak di di Rokan Hulu berupa tindakan pre-emtif, tindakan preventif serta tindakan represif. Upaya preventif yang dilakukan penegak hukum yang bertujuan untuk melakukan pencegahan terhadap kemungkinan terjadinya kejahatan pencabulan terhadap anak yaitu berupa himbauan – himbauan dan sosialisasi terhadap masyarakat tentang kejahatan pencabulan. Juga upaya represif yang dilakukan penegak hukum dan lembaga lainnya, upaya yang dilakukan bertujuan untuk memberikan keserasian yang pernah terganggu atau efek jera karena melakukan suatu kejahatan khususnya pencabulan terhadap anak dengan cara menjatuhkan sanksi sesuai dengan pelanggaran yang dilakukan. Kata kunci : Penanggulangan, perbuatan cabul, kepolisian
Checks and Balances in the Reorganization of State Institutions: A Constitutional Perspective Aryo Akbar; Surizki Febrianto; Bagio Kadaryanto; Yusramizza Md Isa; Hyeonsoo KIM
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 26 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v26i3.30064

Abstract

This study aims to examine the application of the principle of checks and balances within Indonesia's constitutional structure, focusing on the relations among the House of Representatives (DPR), the President, and the Supreme Court/Constitutional Court. This principle is essential to preventing the misuse of power among branches of government and to ensuring that governmental administration operates in accordance with the rule of law and constitutionalism, particularly within a presidential system such as Indonesia's. This study employs a normative legal research method, analyzing primary and secondary legal materials related to the implementation of checks and balances within Indonesia's constitutional structure. The results show that checks and balances are implemented through interaction among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, each possessing authority to supervise and counterbalance the others, as reflected in the relationships between the legislature and executive, the executive and judiciary, and the legislature and judiciary. These dynamics are shaped by overlapping authority among state institutions, which frequently produces ambiguity in the exercise of legislative oversight and judicial review. The study concludes that optimizing checks and balances requires a clearer delineation of institutional authority, whether through statutory revision or constitutional amendment, to ensure consistent and effective oversight. These findings have practical implications for legislative drafters and constitutional policymakers in clarifying overlapping supervisory mandates and reducing institutional ambiguity.