Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Building of Informatics, Technology and Science

Studi Perbandingan Metode MABAC dan WASPAS dengan Pembobotan ROC dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Terbaik Pratiwi, Heny; Sa’ad, Muhammad Ibnu; Hasiholan, Jundro Daud
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 7 No 1 (2025): June (2025)
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v7i1.7278

Abstract

The selection of the right supplier is a crucial factor in the supply chain to ensure product quality, cost efficiency, and timely delivery. This study aims to determine the best supplier by comparing two multi-criteria decision-making methods: Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS). Five key criteria were used in the evaluation: product quality, price, delivery punctuality, service and responsiveness, and reputation and trust. The analysis results show that PT. Indo Makmur (A1) consistently ranked first in both methods, with the highest scores of 0.456 (MABAC) and 0.982 (WASPAS), making it the recommended supplier. PT. Sukses Bersama (A7) and PT. Cahaya Abadi (A3) ranked second and third in both methods, indicating good performance. Meanwhile, UD. Sentosa Jaya (A4) ranked the lowest in both methods, suggesting that this supplier is less competitive than the other alternatives. The comparison of results between MABAC and WASPAS methods demonstrates ranking consistency, confirming that both methods can be reliably used in decision-making. This study provides data-driven recommendations for companies in selecting the best supplier, thereby enhancing supply chain efficiency and supporting long-term business strategies.
Student Class Grouping in Junior High Schools Based on Academic Performance Using the Fuzzy C-Means Method Bustomi, Tommy; Hasiholan, Jundro Daud; Harianto, Kusno
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 7 No 3 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v7i3.8585

Abstract

Abstrak−Differences in academic abilities among junior high school students often pose a challenge for schools in conducting class groupings objectively and efficiently. Many educational institutions, including SMP Negeri Y, still rely on manual grouping methods that are subjective and do not accurately reflect the actual conditions of students. Inaccurate grouping may lead to imbalanced learning processes, where students with high and low academic abilities are placed in the same group without considering their performance variations. Therefore, a data-driven approach is needed to represent student characteristics comprehensively and flexibly. This study aims to apply the Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) method to cluster students of SMP Negeri Y based on four main attributes: Academic Average, Attitude Score, Activeness Score, and Attendance. The FCM method was chosen for its ability to handle data uncertainty and assign multiple membership degrees to each student across different clusters. Prior to clustering, the data underwent a preprocessing stage involving data cleaning, normalization using StandardScaler, and scale adjustment across attributes to improve the accuracy of Euclidean distance calculations. The analysis results revealed the formation of two main clusters representing student academic performance levels. Cluster 0 has an average academic score of 78.37 with moderate attitude and activeness levels, while Cluster 1 shows a higher academic average of 82.18 accompanied by better attitude, activeness, and attendance scores. Based on the highest membership degree, 38 students were assigned to Cluster 0 and 26 students to Cluster 1. Model evaluation using Fuzzy Partition Coefficient (FPC), Modified Partition Coefficient (MPC), and Silhouette Score indicated the optimal configuration at a fuzziness level of m = 2, yielding FPC = 0.680, MPC = 0.359, and Silhouette Score = 0.334. These findings demonstrate that FCM is effective in representing variations in student abilities more realistically, while also providing an objective foundation for schools to design adaptive learning strategies and implement data-driven academic policies.