Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mozaik Kerapuhan Cyrilius Wilton Taran Lamataro; Chatryen M. Dju Bire; Jenny Ermalinda
Jurnal Manajemen, Ekonomi, Hukum, Kewirausahaan, Kesehatan, Pendidikan dan Informatika Vol 1 No 02 (2022): Jurnal Manajemen, Ekonomi, Hukum, Kewirausahaan, Kesehatan, Pendidikan dan Infor
Publisher : Shofanah Media Berkah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

− Evaluasi Hakim Konstitusi tidak pernah diatur dalam undang-undang tentang mahkamah konstitui, namun dalam praktek sebagaimana dilakukan Komisi III DPR RI terhadap Hakim Konstitusi Aswanto adalah suatu anomali hukum. Penelitian ini hendak mengkaji eksistensi evaluasi hakim konstitusi dalam aspek politik hukum. Tipe penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan kasus (case approach), pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan, pertama, konsep evaluasi hakim konstitusi secara konseptual tidak dikenal karena eksistensinya hanya menggangu independensi dan imparsialitas hakim konstitusi. Kedua, Politik hukum yang menyertai revisi undang-undang Mahkamah Konstitusi terutama terkait dengan penambahan ketentuan evaluasi hakim konstitusi tidak mempunyai ratio legis yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dan hanya berdasarkan ”emosi politik”.
Penanggulangan Kemiskinan dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan Sosial Cyrilius Wilton Taran Lamataro; Jenny Ermalinda; Chatryen M Dju Bire
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): November: Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v4i4.2882

Abstract

Poverty remains a multidimensional problem that affects the fulfillment of fundamental social rights, including access to education, healthcare, social security, and economic opportunities. This study aims to analyze the synchronization and consistency of poverty alleviation regulations with the constitutional mandate of social justice under Article 34 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and to formulate a legal protection framework for impoverished communities in ensuring legal certainty. This research employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The analysis focuses on laws and regulations governing social welfare, social security, and poverty alleviation policies through the perspectives of social justice theory, welfare state theory, and legal certainty theory. The findings indicate that, vertically, poverty alleviation regulations are generally consistent with constitutional mandates. However, horizontally, regulatory fragmentation, overlapping institutional authority, weak policy integration, and the absence of enforceable legal remedies continue to hinder the realization of substantive social justice. Furthermore, existing legal protection mechanisms have not fully recognized social rights as enforceable rights. Therefore, legal reform is required through regulatory harmonization, the establishment of minimum welfare standards, strengthened state accountability, and the adoption of a rights-based approach in poverty alleviation policies.