Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.556
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Perikanan Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Gema Wiralodra Jurnal Yustitia Cepalo JURNAL DE JURE MUHAMMADIYAH CIREBON Jurnal Suara Hukum Jatijajar Law Review
Siti Sumartini, Siti
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
KEDUDUKAN FILSAFAT HUKUM DALAM PEMBENTUKAN POLITIK HUKUM NEGARA INDONESIA UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN NEGARA KESEJAHTERAAN (Welfare State) Sumartini, Siti; Alam, Kodrat
Yustitia Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v5i2.80

Abstract

The legal philosophy and legal politics of a country in the perspective of academic studies are two (2) highly correlated and influential things. The law is basically not sterile from its social subsystem. Politics often intervenes on the actions and execution of the law so that the question arises about which subsystem between law and politics is more supremetive. This question arises because of the abundance of blunt laws in the interruption arbitrariness of authority, the law is incapable of upholding justice and cannot present itself as a matter that should be the legal task of solving it. The linkage between philosophy and law that only philosophical approach to law is an attempt to provide rational thought about time-bound law, or attempt to formulate a general theory of the legal order to meet some of the needs of legal development or state development. With the philosophy of law philosophers on the formation of a country's legal politics, it will manifest a paradigm of the welfare state. Keyword: Philosophy of law, status and legal policy
FUNGSI HAK ANGKET DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT UNTUK MELAKUKAN PENYELIDIKAN TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN UNDANG-UNDANG Sumartini, Siti; Arifin, Jajang
Yustitia Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v6i1.97

Abstract

The inquiry right of the House of Representatives (DPR-Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat) is the right of the DPR to conduct an investigation of the implementation of laws/government policies relating to important things, strategic, and broad impacts on the life of the community, nation, and state suspected of being in conflict with the law regulations. The DPR's inquiry rights relating to the implementation of the DPR's oversight function are “an institutionalized system, involving the effectiveness and regularity of restrictions on government actions”. According to the definition above, the questions arise is what is the position of the inquiry rights in the implementation of the DPR's oversight function on the implementation of a law? What is the implication of the Constitutional Court's decision Number: 36 / PUU-XV / 2017 for the implementation of the DPR's inquiry right to the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK – Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi)? The study was conducted using a normative juridical approach (legal research). In this case, testing and reviewing secondary data are done relating to the problem to be discussed. The inquiry right is not the right to know about the possibility of a crime in a case. The inaccuracy in the conception of the inquiry right which is also shown in its implementation such as the DPR investigating the Bullogate, BLBI cases and others can (even) distort the function of the DPR in the formation of laws (legislation) or oversight of the implementation of government tasks and state spending, including the appointment of public officials in the form of public officials, approval or rejection, or in the form of giving consideration by the Parliament. Therefore, if the function is expected to be carried out effectively, dynamically, and naturally, changes to the MD3 Law must be initiated primarily by members of the DPR itself. There must be a strong desire from the members of Parliament to reposition themselves as representatives of the people who are aspirational and serve the interests of all the people they represent. This strong desire will manifestly manifest, if they are not restarted, because they are opposing the party's policy line.
Analisa hukum tentang konflik Uni Eropa yang secara sepihak menaikan Bea masuk imbalan kepada Indonesia dalam komoditas biodiesel dihubungkan dengan peraturan article vi anti-dumping and countervailing duty WTO Hasanah, Dewi Agustin; Sumartini, Siti; Setiady, Tri
Gema Wiralodra Vol. 14 No. 1 (2023): Gema Wiralodra
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/gw.v14i1.272

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas tentang permasalahan yang muncul dari kebijakan sepihak UE yang menaikan Bea Masuk Imbalan (BMI) kepada komoditas biodiesel Indonesia sebesar 8%-18% yang berlaku secara provisional dari 6 September 2019 dan ditetapkan secara definitif pada 4 Januari 2020 dan berlaku selama 5 tahun. Penelitian ini menggunakan Metode Yuridis Normatif dengan meneliti data sekunder sebagai bahan dasar untuk diteliti, kemudian mengadakan penelusuran terhadap peraturan-peraturan dan literatur-literatur yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan yang diteliti. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa tidak ada negara manapun yang dapat dikenakan BMI sesuai Paragraph 6(a) Article VI Anti Dumping and Countervailing Duty WTO sebelum adanya investigasi yang dilakukan oleh otoritas setempat untuk mendapatkan bukti meliputi: (1) subsidi; (2) kerugian materil; (3) hubungan sebab akibat antara subsidi dan kerugian. Serta negara pengimpor harus memastikan bahwa barang yang mengandung subsidi tersebut: (1) menyebabkan kerugian materil pada industri mapan; (2) mengancam kerugian material industri mapan; (3) menghambat pendirian industri dalam negeri. Pengenaan BMI secara sepihak diperbolehkan dalam keadaan luar biasa sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam Paragraph 6(b) Article VI Anti Dumping and Countervailing Duty WTO dengan mempertimbangkan bahwa keadaan tersebut memang sangat genting dan tetap memperhatikan syarat dalam pengenaan BMI. Kebijakan yang dapat diambil oleh pemerintah Indonesia adalah kebijakan litigasi meliputi meminta hak untuk mendapatkan keterbukaan informasi, meminta dengar pendapat, meminta peninjauan kembali dan untuk mengadukan ke forum DSB WTO. Dan kebijakan non litigasi meliputi perbaikan tata kelola hilirisasi; memperluas cakupan ekspor biodiesel; peremajaan lahan sawit; memberikan perhatian serius dan tata kelola yang baik pada program mandatori biodiesel B-20, B-30 serta tujuan akhir B-100; perbaikan reputasi minyak kelapa sawit melalui penelitian-penelitian yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah, swasta dan seluruh komponen masyarakat
BADAN USAHA MILIK DESA (BUMDes) DALAM SISTEM HUKUM EKONOMI NASIONAL Wahid, Abdul; Rohadi, Rohadi; Sumartini, Siti; Mansur, Mansur
Yustitia Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v11i2.327

Abstract

The presence of BUMDes is expected that the village will become more independent and the community will become more prosperous. But considering that BUMDes is still a new thing in its existence, it is inevitable that in practice, several obstacles arise precisely related to the process of its formation. the existence of BUMDes, both in terms of the role and regulation of the law and in the implementing regulations, there are still deficiencies, especially its position as a form of business entity. The problem of this research is what is the position of BUMDes in the legal system of the national economy and what is the role of BUMDes in the national economic system. The research method used is normative legal research. The conclusions obtained from research on BUMDes regulations have existed since the promulgation of Law Number 22 of 1948 concerning Principles of Regional Government, then successively regulated in Law Number 1 of 1957 concerning Principles of Regional Government, Law Number 18 of 1965 regarding Principles of Regional Government, Law Number 19 of 1965 concerning Praja Villages as a Transitional Form to Accelerate the Realization of Level III Regions throughout the Territory of the Republic of Indonesia, Law Number 5 of 1974 concerning Principles of Governance in the Regions, Law Number 5 of 1979 concerning Village Government, Law Number 22 of 1999 regarding Regional Government, Law Number 32 of 2004 regarding Regional Government. Separate arrangements are made through the promulgation of Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Village Administration. As a business entity, BUMDes plays an important role in the development and progress of the economy at the village level as the basis for the agricultural industry. The presence of BUMDes can be a tool for social engineering in the field of welfare which will function to engineer the standard of living of stagnant rural communities towards better progress in the welfare of their people.
Co-Authors Abdul Wahid Alam, Kodrat Budiyanto, - Gatri Sagala, Stefani Hasanah, Dewi Agustin Jajang Arifin Kholik, Saeful Mansur Mansur Nugraha Eka Hardana Nurwahyuni Piliana, Wa Ode Rohadi Rohadi Tri Setiady, Tri