Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

IMPLICATIONS OF AUTOGATE AS THE OPTIMIZATION OF IMMIGRATION TECHNOLOGY IN RELATIONSHIP TO REDUCE THE CRIMINAL ACTION OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING Atsil Syah Gibran; Sekar Arini Prakita; Muhammad Choirul Yusuf; Sarina Riyadi
Journal of Law and Border Protection Vol 5 No 1 (2023): JLBP : Journal of Law and Border Protection
Publisher : Polteknik Imigrasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52617/jlbp.v5i1.422

Abstract

Human Trafficking is an extraordinary crime because it is generally involved with sexual offenses and forced labour; which is a clear violation of human rights. Autogate technology has been implemented at Soekarno-Hatta Airport to speed up departure and arrival procedures at the country's entrance; however, it is seen as a potential risk factor for trafficking. While technologies such as biometric scanning and automated processing speed up document checks for immigration with Autogate, fewer opportunities for people to interact directly with security agents increase the risk of trafficking. Some analyzes must consider many variables, such as the security of autogate technology, the expansion of human movement, and the protection of human rights. This essay aims to attenuate how implementing autogate can impact human trafficking. Moreover, with the existence of an autogate, these findings will help policy makers develop more effective steps to prevent human trafficking.
REIDUCTION (REFUGEE INCLUSIVE EDUCATION BY IMMIGRATION): INOVASI TEKNOLOGI PENDIDIKAN BERBASIS APLIKASI SEBAGAI PERAN KEIMIGRASIAN DALAM PEMENUHAN AKSES QUALITY EDUCATION BAGI ANAK-ANAK DENGAN STATUS INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSON DAN PENGUNGSI INTERNASIONA Atsil Syah Gibran; Muhammad Choirul Yusuf; Sarina Riyadi
TEMATICS: Technology Management and Informatics Research Journals Vol 5 No 1 (2023): TEMATICS: Technology ManagemenT and Informatics Research Journals
Publisher : Polteknik Imigrasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52617/tematics.v5i1.463

Abstract

Fakta empiris yang menempatkan Indonesia sebagai negara non-ratifikasi Konvensi 1951 dan protokol 1967 tentang pengungsi, sekiranya menjadi hambatan fundamental untuk merespon lebih jauh problematika terkait keberadaan pengungsi di teritorial Indonesia, khususnya mencakup aspek pemenuhan hidup mendasar layaknya Pendidikan. Ketetapan yuridis terkait keimigrasian pada Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 Tentang Keimigrasian juga tidak selaras untuk mendukung pemerintah, khususnya instansi imigrasi dalam rangka penanganan pengungsi, bahkan pengungsi asing masih dianggap sebagai subjek orang asing yang masuk secara non-prosedural, sehingga harus ditempatkan di Fasilitas Keimigrasian berupa Rumah Detensi Imigrasi (Rudenim) atau tempat lain yang menunjang fungsi pemondokan bagi pengungsi dengan menerapkan SOP Rudenim. Kendati demikian, pemerintah terikat pada Konvensi Hak Anak untuk menjamin pemenuhan Pendidikan kepada anak-anak pengungsi sebagai subjek rentan dan memiliki keterikatan secara moral dalam merespons problematika pengungsi yang transit di Indonesia akibat mengalami refoulement oleh beberapa negara ketiga yang seharusnya dapat menjadi lokus resettlement bagi para pengungsi. Meninjau pada situasi tersebut, benturan hukum dan moralitas yang terjadi menjadi celah konkret bagi instansi imigrasi untuk memantik para stakeholder dalam memberikan problem solving secara sementara dengan mengembangkan platform Pendidikan khusus berbasis teknologi aplikasi yang sifatnya terbatas bagi anak-anak pengungsi, baik pengungsi asing maupun domestik. Adanya langkah konkret untuk memperhatikan pemenuhan Pendidikan secara inklusif kepada warga dunia menunjukkan sisi pro aktif dari pemerintah dengan menerapkan konklusi yang berorientasi pada dasar humanitas untuk menyambut proyeksi besar terkait Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan.
Disparities in Jurisdictional Locus Between the Enforcement of Maritime Immigration and Customs Laws Based on the Provisions of UNCLOS 1982 Through an Analysis of Lawrence M. Friedman's Legal System Theory Muhammad Choirul Yusuf; M. Alvi Syahrin; Ridwan Arifin
Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum VOLUME 10 ISSUE 2 APRIL 2026
Publisher : PDIH Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jidh.v0i0.6563

Abstract

Indonesia's geographical location at the intersection of two continents and oceans makes it a strategic consideration in assessing maritime development potential. To achieve maritime security resilience oriented toward the management and efficiency of maritime resources, the existence of law enforcement and legal substance in maritime zones is necessary to formulate legal certainty. The parent legal provisions governing maritime zone provisions and management rests on Law Number 17 of 1985, which ratified UNCLOS 1982, with its 320 articles and 9 annex. Among the various maritime zone provisions, there is the term "contiguous zone," which is a special jurisdiction extending 24 miles from the regulated sea baseline and serves as the basis for Immigration, Customs, Fiscal, and Sanitary Affairs to conduct supervision related to its legal provisions. However, the regulation of contiguous zones or maritime area specifications has not been accommodated in Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration as a form of active supervisory function, while Law Number 17 of 2006 concerning Customs has long accommodated provisions providing concrete supervision. This paper aims to analyze the harmonization of legislation, historical, and empirical aspects related to legal considerations regarding the formulation of articles regulating the locus of jurisdiction for maritime immigration supervision, thereby providing an ideal legal formulation within the framework of academic studies. The research method used in this paper is a normative-empirical one. The theory in this study applies Lawrence Friedman's legal system theory as an analytical tools. The results also indicate the legal impacts that lead to downstream problems related to immigration violations in maritime zones due to the lack of zoning regulations. Therefore, constructive legal and policy formulations are needed to serve as a fundamental foundation for projecting a comprehensive immigration oversight mechanism in Indonesia's maritime zones.