Gregorius Sahdan
Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa APMD

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

TRANSFORMASI PENYELENGGARAAN PEMERINTAHAN DESA Gregorius Sahdan
GOVERNABILITAS (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Semesta) Vol 3 No 2 (2022): Government Making : Desa, Adat dan Transformasi Pemerintahan
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan - Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa "APMD"

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47431/governabilitas.v3i2.218

Abstract

Village political authority to manage its authority has been eroded by the government through various sectoral ministry policies that are anti-village. The village has lost its authority as the subject of village administration. The central government places village administration as "scientific", through technocratization, namely applying applications that mislead villages. Villages are not managed politically, but technocratically which causes village democracy to not work. The state has even carried out neo-corporatism over villages with the aim that village transformation is more directed towards realizing the interests of the state, not the interests of the community. The transformation has strengthened the involution and formalism of village democracy, also causing village administration to return to the state-led government model or government run by the state, on state instructions, not based on community initiatives. The emergence of various government regulations such as Permendes No. 21 of 2020 concerning Guidelines for Implementing Village Development and Empowering Village Communities, not only makes villages more technocratic, but also kills village democracy, as mandated by Law No. 6 of 2014 concerning Villages.
State Corporatism in Village Development Planning Gregorius Sahdan; Minardi Minardi; Mohamad Firdaus; Junior Hendri Wijaya
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 12 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jish.v12i2.63514

Abstract

This study departs from the problem that state corporatism is the biggest challenge in realizing village authority. The study of state corporatism has been considered obsolete along with the collapse of authoritarian regimes and governments. After authoritarianism in Indonesia, especially after the enactment of Law No. 6 of 2014 on Villages, state corporatism is very strong in gripping village authority. The question posed in this study is to what extent is state corporatism threatening village authority? Wes used exploratory qualitative methods with case study techniques in Bogem Village, Klaten Regency, Central Java Province, to answer this question—data wes collected by observation, in-depth interviews, and document collection. Data analysis uses triangulation techniques, and findings use interpretive and contextual analysis techniques. Wes found that the state carries out two strategies in corporatism toward villages, namely, a bifrontal strategy and a segmentary strategy. Through these two strategies, village authority and autonomy are weakened in the face of strengthening the grip of the state or village government through various supra-village programs and policies towards villages.