Mohamad Firdaus
Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa APMD

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KEKUASAAN DAN KEDAULATAN MEMERINTAH Muhtar Habbodin; Mohamad Firdaus
GOVERNABILITAS (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Semesta) Vol 3 No 1 (2022): Pemerintahan Melayani dan Melindungi
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan - Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa "APMD"

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47431/governabilitas.v3i1.166

Abstract

Power and sovereignty are interrelated in governance. The government in power has sovereignty in governing which comes from the people through a consensus (government making). Therefore, the ruling government must be responsible to the people who are then transformed into citizens (citizen making). This is practiced in a democratic government system. In contrast, the authoritarian system of government power is in the hands of the government. The position of the people is weak and marginalized in power. These two systems of government are still ongoing today. However, the most dominant and widely practiced is the power that comes from the people. Instrumentation of people's power when choosing sovereign leaders through democratic elections. The choice of a leader is largely determined by the people. This proves that the power and sovereignty of governing are in the control of the people. Therefore, power needs to be oriented to the interests of the people who are citizens, and at the same time be held accountable. The people encourage all leaders in power to be accountable and take political sides with the citizens by making the government the administrator and regulator of the benefit of the citizens.
State Corporatism in Village Development Planning Gregorius Sahdan; Minardi Minardi; Mohamad Firdaus; Junior Hendri Wijaya
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 12 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jish.v12i2.63514

Abstract

This study departs from the problem that state corporatism is the biggest challenge in realizing village authority. The study of state corporatism has been considered obsolete along with the collapse of authoritarian regimes and governments. After authoritarianism in Indonesia, especially after the enactment of Law No. 6 of 2014 on Villages, state corporatism is very strong in gripping village authority. The question posed in this study is to what extent is state corporatism threatening village authority? Wes used exploratory qualitative methods with case study techniques in Bogem Village, Klaten Regency, Central Java Province, to answer this question—data wes collected by observation, in-depth interviews, and document collection. Data analysis uses triangulation techniques, and findings use interpretive and contextual analysis techniques. Wes found that the state carries out two strategies in corporatism toward villages, namely, a bifrontal strategy and a segmentary strategy. Through these two strategies, village authority and autonomy are weakened in the face of strengthening the grip of the state or village government through various supra-village programs and policies towards villages.