Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

UPAYA HUKUM LEMBAGA PEMBIAYAAN DALAM HAL TERJADINYA PENGALIHAN OBJEK PERJANJIAN DALAM PERJANJIAN SEWA BELI KENDARAAN Rio Febrianto; Diah Apriana; Fauzan Pramana; Ria Wantika Sari; Daniel Christianto; Marsudi Utoyo
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Agustus
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (522.88 KB)

Abstract

Abstrak Perjanjian sewa beli di Indonesia dewasa ini berkembang dengan pesat. Hal ini dapat kita lihat dalam praktek sehari-hari, banyaknya peminat dari masyarakat terhadap perjanjian tersebut, terutama dalam pemenuhan kebutuhan sekundernya. Perjanjian Sewa Beli sebagai salah satu bentuk perjanjian tidak bernama, bagaimana upaya hukum lembaga pembiayaan dalam hal terjadinya pengalihan objek perjanjian dalam perjanjian sewa beli kendaraan. Penelitian dalam tulisan ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif, yang diteliti hanya bahan pustaka atau data sekunder, yang mungkin mencakup bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tertier. Upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan kreditur, dimana kreditur berhak meminta ganti kerugian atas wanprestasi yang dilakukan debitur sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Pasal 1243 KUH Perdata. Disamping itu kreditur juga bisa membatalkan perjanjian tersebut sesuai dengan yang tercantum dalam perjanjian Pasal 6a ayat (4) yang disebutkan diawal, dimana hal tersebut juga sesuai dengan Pasal 1266 KUH Perdata. Kreditur juga dapat melakukan penarikan kendaraan yang menjadi objek perjanjian, maka debitur wajib menyerahkan kendaraan tersebut. Sesuai dengan Pasal 30 Undang-Undang Nomor 42 tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Kata Kunci : Lembaga Pembiayaan, Perjanjian,Sewa Beli Abstract Lease and purchase agreements in Indonesia are currently growing rapidly. We can see this in daily practice, the large number of people's interest in the agreement, especially in meeting its secondary needs. Lease Agreement Buy as a form of agreement is not named, how the legal remedy of the financing institution in the event of the transfer of the object of the agreement in the lease agreement buys a vehicle. The research in this paper is normative juridical research, which is researched only library materials or secondary data, which may include primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Legal remedies that can be made by creditors, and creditors have the right to seek compensation for defaults made by debtors as regulated in Article 1243 of the Civil Code.In addition, the creditor can also cancel the agreement in accordance with those stated in the agreement of Article 6a paragraph (4) mentioned at the beginning, which is also in accordance with Article 1266 of the Civil Code.The creditor can also make a withdrawal of the vehicle that is the object of the agreement, then the debtor is obliged to hand over the vehicle. In accordance with Article 30 of LawNo. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees.
Upaya Hukum Lembaga Pembiayaan Dalam Hal Terjadinya Pengalihan Objek Perjanjian Dalam Perjanjian Sewa Beli Kendaraan Rio Febrianto; Diah Apriana; Fauzan Pramana; Ria Wantika Sari; Daniel Christianto; Marsudi Utoyo
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Currently, the lease purchase agreement in Indonesia is growing rapidly. This can be seen in everyday life because there are many people who support the agreement, especially to meet its secondary needs. In a rental agreement to buy a vehicle, as one of the types of an unnamed agreement, the legal effort of the funding agency in respect of the transfer of the object of the agreement. It is a normative jurisprudence that only looks at library material or secondary data that can include primary, secondary, or tertiary legal material. The legal effort that a creditor may make, as regulated in article 1243 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relates to the creditor's right to claim damages for the default of the debtor. In addition, in accordance with the provisions listed in the agreement of Article 6a paragraph (4) mentioned above, and in conformity with Article 1266 of the Code of Procedure, the creditor may also cancel the agreements. The creditor may also steal the vehicle which is the object of the agreement; in this case, the debtor must surrender the vehicle. In accordance with Section 30 of the Trust Guarantee Act No. 42 of 1999.