Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.145
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Amicus Curiae
Dyah Setyorini
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENANGKAPAN IKAN TANPA SIPI DAN MENGGUNAKAN JARING TRAWL Ernawaty Putri Elisabet Siburian; Dyah Setyorini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i6.15002

Abstract

Every fishing activity in the water area of ​​the Republic of Indonesia must have a permit and meet the requirements for the use of fishing nets as regulated in the Regulations. This research discusses Fishing without SIPI. This research is normative and descriptive analytical legal research, using secondary data obtained through library research. The data is analyzed qualitatively and the conclusions are drawn using deductive logic. The conclusion from this research is the fishing by Sugianto did not use SIPI and violated article 27 paragraph (1) Law Number 45/2009 from Law Number 31/2004 concerning fishery and Sugianto also using nets in the form of Trawls Nets. On the other hand the actions he did categorized as Illegal Fishing.
PENANGKAPAN IKAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN BAHAN PELEDAK DI WILAYAH PERAIRAN TAKA GARAS MAUMERE Nur Fitriani; Dyah Setyorini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i6.15035

Abstract

Illegal fishing often use explosives. The Research’s problem is how the policies regarding fishing gear in Law on Fisheries and the Job Creation Law and how fishing carried out by the Kasdin using explosives in terms of the Law on Fisheries and the Job Creation Law (case study Decision Number 4/Pid.Sus-Prk/2020/PN Mme). The research conducted in normative and descriptive analytical legal research, using secondary data and primary and secondary legal materials. The data is analyzed qualitatively and conclusions drawn using deductive logic method. The conclusion is that the policy related to the prohibition of the use of bombs (chemical explosives) in fishing activities is regulated in Law Number 45 of 2009 concerning Fisheries, Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number 18 of 2021 and Government Regulation Number 27 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Maritime Affairs and Fishery. Based on the case in Decision Number 4/Pid.Sus-Prk/2020/PNMme, Kasdin violated Article 8 (1) of Law 45/2009 Concerning Fisheries, Article 7 (1) and (2) of Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number 18 of 2021, Article 43 (1) Government Regulation Number 27 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Maritime Affairs and Fishery and can be categorized as illegal fishing using explosive.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENANGKAPAN IKAN TANPA SIUP DAN SIPI OLEH KAPAL BERBENDERA ASING Keiko Hauriza Setiawan; Dyah Setyorini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 3 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i5.15119

Abstract

Every individual or corporation engaged in the fishing industry is required to hold a permit. It is intended that by granting this licence, fishing operations will be legally protected and that fish resources will remain abundant. The Job Creation Law and Law No. 31/2004 concerning Amendments to Law No. 31 of 2004 Concerning Fisheries (hereinafter referred to as the Fisheries Law) very clearly regulate licenses for fishing activities, but PERMEN Maritime Affairs and Fisheries No. 17/2006 concerning Capture Fisheries Businesses regulates licenses for fishing activities for Indonesian-flagged vessels then changed the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Regulation No. 58/2020 concerning Capture Fisheries Businesses, providing licenses to vessels flying the Indonesian and foreign flags, Fishing by foreign-flagged vessels without a Fishery Business Permit (SIUP) and Permit Fishing (SIPI) is clearly illegal and in violation of Articles 26 and 27 of the Fisheries Law. It may also be subject to Article 92 of the Fisheries Law.
PENDAFTARAN HAK TANGGUNGAN TERINTEGRASI SECARA ELEKTRONIK DI KANTOR PERTANAHAN KOTA DEPOK Elisabeth Putri; Dyah Setyorini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 3 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i5.15133

Abstract

According to the Permen ATR/Ka.BPN Number 5 of 2020 Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency concerning Services Electronic Integrated Mortgage Rights, Electronically Integrated Mortgage (HT-el) is a set of procedures for servicing mortgage rights in the context of maintaining land registration data that  organized through an integrated electronic system. However, the implementation of electronic mortgage registration is in accordance with the Regulation of ATR/Ka.BPN Number 5 of 2020, starting from preparation to issuance of the Electronic Mortgage Certificate (HT-el Certificate), p. The Depok City Land Office is still in the development stage of electronic mortgage registration. Communication, availability of resources, attitude, and organizational structure all have an impact on this. Some challenges the readiness of the Depok City Land Office to improve internal data; and from external factors, such as the readiness of human resources, such as the PPAT and the Bank as the applicant, are the examples of external obstacles that cause the process of carrying out the Electronic Mortgage to be delayed, which will have an impact on the birth of the Mortgage. All barriers must be removed in the future, along with increased data verification and thorough training for all parties involved.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR DALAM HAL HAPUSNYA HAK ATAS TANAH YANG DIBEBANKAN HAK TANGGUNGAN (SUATU KAJIAN YURIDIS) Dyah Setyorini
Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Prioris Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Trisakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/prio.v19i2.16650

Abstract

Hapusnya Hak Tanggungan yang disebabkan karena hapusnya hak atas tanah yang dibebani Hak Tanggungan tidak lain dan tidak bukan adalah sebagai akibat tidak terpenuhinya syarat objektif sahnya perjanjian, khususnya yang berhubungan dengan kewajiban adanya objek tertentu, yang salah satunya meliputi keberadaan dari bidang tanah tertentu yang dijaminkan. Menurut ketentuan Pasal 18 Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan bahwa Hak Tanggungan dapat berakhir bahkan sebelum utang debitor terbayar lunas, yakni karena hapusnya hak atas tanah yang dibebani Hak Tanggungan tersebut. Ada beberapa kemungkinan yang dapat menyebabkan hak atas tanah yang dibebani Hak Tanggungan hapus, yaitu jangka waktu berakhir, dihentikan sebelum jangka waktunya berakhir, karena suatu syarat batal telah dipenuhi; dicabut untuk kepentingan umum; dilepaskan dengan sukarela oleh pemilik hak atas tanah; tanahnya musnah. Adapun upaya yang dapat dilakukan kreditur untuk menghindari kemungkinan resiko hapusnya hak atas tanah, yaitu pembuatan Janji Memperpanjang Hak Atas tanah Pada Akta Pembebanan Hak Tanggungan; pembuatan Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan saat Perubahan HGB menjadi Hak Milik Atas Rumah Tinggal; pengansuransian Obyek Hak Tanggungan untuk Keuntungan Pemegang Hak Tanggungan; meminta Jaminan Tambahan Kepada Debitor. Terkait dengan hapusnya Hak Tanggungan akibat hapusnya hak atas tanah yang menjadi objek Hak Tanggungan, tidak menyebabkan hutangnya menjadi hapus, namun hutang tersebut tidak lagi dijamin dengan Hak Tanggungan, sehingga kedudukan kreditor bukan preferen lagi melainkan kreditor konkuren. Untuk itu dalam praktek kreditur dari awal pemberian kredit harus sudah mengambil langkah-langkah prefentif untuk menanggulangi hapusnya hak atas tanah yang dijadikan objek Hak Tanggungan, diantaranya dalam praktek diutamakan objek jaminan pokok adalah Hak Milik dan untuk objek jaminan tambahan adalah Hak Guna Bangunan, Hak Guna Usaha dan Hak Pakai. Kata kunci: Hak Tanggungan, Hapusnya Hak Atas Tanah
Co-Authors Elisabeth Putri Endang Pandamdari Ernawaty Putri Elisabet Siburian Gandes Candra Kirana Ignatius Pradipa Probondaru Jennyola Savira Keiko Hauriza Setiawan Nur Fitriani Saphira Eka Aprilia Syifa Esthiningtyas Putri Widodo