Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.668
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Social Service and Research Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Amicus Curiae Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti
Setiyono Setiyono
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PUTUSAN BEBAS YANG TIDAK MEMPERTIMBANGKAN ALAT BUKTI DALAM PERSIDANGAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA: Acquittal Decision Not Considering Evidence in Trial of Fraud Crime Cases Aura Azahra; Setiyono
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19597

Abstract

Acquittal Deicision is a deicision that proveis that the guilt charged to defeindant has not been provein legally and convincingly guilty. Thei probleim in this study is thei consideration of evideince in the acquittal dictum and eivideintiary poweir eiach evideince in a crimei fileid by the public prosecutor. Based on the probleim it was found that there was a discrepancy in the consideiration of evideincei in the acquittal dictum where in fact the evideince submitteid and examineid in thei trial had met the two minimum principleis of eivideincei and fulfilleid thei two eleimeints of the articlei one hundreid eiighty fivei seiction six of thei Criminal Procedure Code and thei streingth of the evideince submitted and examined is containeid in Article one hundreid eighty four section one of the Criminal Procedure Code. The reseiarch method used is normative juridical by conducting qualitative data analysis.
PRAPERADILAN JULIET ASRIL SEBAGAI TERSANGKA PIDANA KORUPSI (PUTUSAN NOMOR 3/PID.PRA/2021/PN.TPG): Juliet Asril Pretrial as a Criminal Suspect of Corruption (Decision Number 3/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Tpg) Bernandia Hamsyah Dinanti; Setiyono
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19609

Abstract

Pretrial Request Number 3/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Tpg from the Tanjung Pinang District Court, citing expiration as the basis for the request. This study focuses on how Pre-trial object arrangements are governed by the Criminal Procedure Code in relation to the Constitutional Court's decision No. 21/PUU-XII/2014 and whether the legal considerations and dictum of the Pretrial decision No. 3/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Tpg were in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Constitutional Court's decision No. 21/PUU-XII/2014. The author conducted normative research in order to respond to this query. Data management is conducted qualitatively, with reference to secondary data or library materials, while analysis and conclusion-drawing are qualitatively descriptive and deductive, respectively. Conclusions drawn from the research and discussion are that the legal considerations and the judge's dictum in Tanjungpinang District Pre-Trial Case Number 3/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Tpg are not appropriate because there are only two grounds for determining a suspect: the allegation that the suspect committed a crime and the existence of sufficient preliminary evidence.
REKONSTRUKSI KEBIJAKAN TERHADAP PENETAPAN SAKSI PELAKU YANG BEKERJASAMA PADA PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DITINJAU DARI ASPEK KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN ASPEK KEMANFAATAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA TERPADU Setiyono Setiyono; Sugeng Supartono; Dinda Keumala; Khairani Bakri
Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti Volume 1, Nomor 2, September 2023
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/ferenda.v1i2.18280

Abstract

Salah satu dari permasalahan yang muncul dalam proses penegakan hukum di bidang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi adalah permasalahan yang terkait dengan penetapan status tersangka atau terdakwa sebagai saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama atau justice collaborator. Adanya beberapa permasalahan yang bersumber dari adanya ketidaksamaan pemahaman atau tidak adaya unifikasi kebijakan dalam menetapkan status pelaku sebagai saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama atau justice collaborator oleh para penegak hukum. Selain itu, adanya permasalahan mengenai ketiadaan manfaat yang dialami oleh tersangka atau terdakwa dari penetapan saksi pelaku yang bekerja sama atau justice collaborator tersebut tentunya menimbulkan adanya ketidakpastian hukum dan juga tidak memberikan kemanfaatan atau utilitas bagi pihak yang ditetapkan sebagai saksi pelaku yang bekerja sama atau justice collaborator. Rumusan permasalahan dalam tulisan ini adalah bagaimana pengaturan tentang kebijakan penetapan saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama atau justice collaborator dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi dan bagaimana rekonstruksi kebijakan penetapan Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi yang memberikan aspek kepastian hukum dan aspek kemanfaatan dalam sebuah sistem peradilan pidana terpadu. Tipe penelitian yang digunakan adalah normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan Undang-Undang dan regulasi lainnya. Sifat penelitian deskriptif, dengan menggunakan data sekunder. Analisis penelitian dilakukan dengan cara kualitatif dan metode penarikan kesimpulan secara deduktif. Pada prakteknya terdapat berbagai maca regulasi yang mengatur tentang tentang kebijakan penetapan saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama atau justice collaborator dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Pengaturan tersebut mulai dalam bentuk Undang-Undang sampai dengan bentuk Peraturan Bersama dari lembaga penegak hukum dan Surat Edaran. Berpedoman dari adanya keanekaragaman pengaturan maka diperlukan rekonstruksi kebijakan pembentukan norma hukum baru dalam bentuk Undang-Undang yang menjadi pedoman mengikat terhadap pengakuan atau rekognisi dan pemahaman atau persepsi yang sama secara hukum mengenai penetapan status saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama atau justice collaborator yang berlaku sejak mulai tahapan pemeriksaan di tingkat penyidikan sampai dengan tahapan pemeriksaan di tingkat pengadilan bahkan sampai dengan pelaksanaan eksekusinya demi terciptanya asas kepastian hukum dan memberikan kemanfaatan atau utilitas bagi tersangka atau terdakwa yang ditetapkan sebagai saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama atau justice collaborator
PUTUSAN ULTRA PETITA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NARKOTIKA Hafizhah Azzahra; Setiyono
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i6.15031

Abstract

The case that occurred on February 1st, 2019 involved a sale and purchase transaction of methamphetamine by Boiy Sairy alias Busairi Bin Tomin. The decision from the Panel of Judges of Situbondo District Court is different from the article charged by the public prosecutor in a single indictment. The defendant was charged with Article 112 of the Narcotics Law, while the judges gives a decision under Article 127 of the Narcotics Law. This research is normative and descriptive analytical legal research, using secondary data obtain through litearure studies and interviews. The data is analyzed qualitatively and conclusions are drawn using deductive understanding. The conclusion of the research is that the Judges use Article 127 while in the indictment and the facts of the trial and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court Decision No. 675 K/Pid/1987, the Defendant BS was proven to have abused Narcotics so that the Judge imposed a criminal sentence and this decision has permanent legal force so that it is valid in the eyes of the law.
ANALISIS YURIDIS ALAT BUKTI SURAT KETERANGAN DOKTER (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 187/PID.SUS/2020/PN MLG) Alwan Rasyid Naufal; Setiyono
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i6.15032

Abstract

Documentary evidence is one of the bases of proving a criminal case which is used before trial to help determine whether or not the defendant is guilty, and the judge who examines a criminal case must pay attention and examine the evidence provided before the trial. Article 54 of Law number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics stated that the victims of Narcotics Abuse and Addicts are required to undergo medical and social rehabilitation. But in practice, there are many narcotics abusers and addicts who are not given rehabilitation sentences but given punishment in the form of imprisonment. Therefore, the research’s problem are regarding the strength of doctor's certificate of evidence in narcotics crime case and the inaccuracy of legal considerations given by Panel of Judges regarding the doctor's certificate as evidence given before the trial. The research is a normative and descriptive analytical legal research, using secondary data obtain through library research, analyzed qualitatively and conclusions drawn using deductive understanding. The research conclusions are that the strength of documents as the evidence is independent and narcotics abusers should be given a punishment in the form of rehabilitation but in accordance with the existing and related regulations.
TINDAK PIDANA MENDISTRIBUSIKAN GAMBAR PORNOGRAFI SECARA BERULANG KALI DALAM BENTUK INFORMASI ELEKTRONIK Nafisha Maudyna; Setiyono
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 3 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i5.15118

Abstract

Pornography on the internet is used frequently to commit crimes against decency. The internet's convenience in this instance encourages someone to disseminate it frequently. The phrasing of the issue under discussion is the type of punishment meted out to those responsible for disseminating these pornographic photos via internet means. The research approach is normative; the research is descriptive in nature; secondary data are employed; secondary data are analyzed qualitatively; and deductive reasoning is used to derive conclusions. The findings of the investigation, the analysis, and the conclusion of the perpetrator's acts are in accordance with Article 45 Paragraph 1 in conjunction with Article 27 Paragraph 1 of the ITE Law along with Section 1 of Article 64 of the Criminal Code. The defendant acted in accordance with the terms of Article 45 paragraph 1 in connection with Article 27 paragraph 1 of the Information and Electronic Transaction Law in conjunction with Article 64 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code when they regularly transmitted pornographic photos. The Criminal Code's (Article 64, Paragraph 1) regulations for continuous acts (Voorgezzete Handeling) must be taken into consideration while determining the appropriate punishment.
TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI MENERIMA UANG YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL Dian Natasha; Setiyono
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 3 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i5.15135

Abstract

A civil officer and the landowner both took use of the regional innovation program offered by the Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education in 2016 to engage in criminal corruption. How appropriately civil servants' receipt of money is governed by the provisions of Article 5 (2) of Law Number 20 of 2001 Concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 Concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (PTPK) and the Assembly's legal considerations is the formulation of the problem. The judge with regard to the criminal penalties meted out to corruption offenders. This article is normative legal, descriptive, secondary data kinds, data collecting for literature studies, qualitative data analysis, and using deductive reasoning. The findings of the study, the discussion, and the conclusion, indicate that the defendant should be charged with the felony of corrupt act, as defined in Article 12 letter an of the PTPK Law, because the defendant's actions are suspected, namely that he accepted promises and gifts without declining the offer even though he knew the gift was intended to persuade him to act in a manner that involved his position as the head of the housing agency.
Co-Authors Alwan Rasyid Naufal Anggi Erika Christina Aura Azahra Bernandia Hamsyah Dinanti Candra Aries Priyendi Dian Natasha Dinda Keumala Eriyantouw Wahid Hafizhah Azzahra I Komang Suka’arsana Khairani Bakri Mega Mustika Noviyanti Nada Samyra Nafisha Maudyna Putu Angel Putri Danasari Sugeng Supartono