Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

The Existence of Local Public Broadcasting Institutions Radio Irama FM Amid Digital Transformation in Public Information Distribution Wirawan, Riska; Laksito, FX. Hastowo Broto
Indonesian Journal of Contemporary Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 3 No. 6 (2024): November 2024
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/modern.v3i6.12451

Abstract

The aim of the research is to describe and analyze the existence of the local public broadcasting institution Radio Irama FM in the midst of digital transformation in the distribution of public information. The type of research used in this research is descriptive qualitative. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that 1) indicators of organizational goals have been determined at the local public broadcasting institution Irama FM radio, to achieve existence in the midst of a rapidly growing digitalization stream; 2) this leadership is a character possessed by each leader which will have a direct impact on the existence and progress of an organization. The pattern of relationship between superiors and subordinates will affect harmonization and create a sense of kinship in an organization. 3) at LPPL Radio Irama FM there is a clear organizational structure for the division of labor, although in some time there has been a change in leadership. This is an innovative effort to maintain the existence of LPPL Radio Irama FM amidst the current digital transformation. 4) The responsibility has been firmly held by all employees at LPPL Radio Irama FM to maintain existence in the midst of the digitalization era, even though there are still obstacles that arise in the field.
Authority of The Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission Post Amendment to Law No. 19 of 2019: Regresive or Progressive in Law Enforcement? Fransiscus Xaverius Hastowo Broto Laksito; Rian Saputra; Doris Rahmat; Waluyo Slamet Pradoto; Aji Bawono; Kesya Zhalibina Sunarto
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.5334

Abstract

The aim of this research is to look at the transformation of the Corruption Eradication Commission Institution after the revision of the new Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Law in supporting corruption prevention policies in Indonesia. This research was conducted using doctrinal legal research methods or normative legal research. In this research, the approaches used include: Statute Approach. Conceptual Approach, Historical Approach, Case Approach. The research results show that: 1) The authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) after the promulgation of Law no. 19 of 2019 concerning the Second Amendment to Law no. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, with the addition of the Supervisory Board within the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)  Institution which has quite large authority, namely not only supervision but also the implementation of the authority of the Corruption Eradication Committee, namely that it must first obtain permission from the Supervisory Board before carrying out wiretapping, searches and/ or the confiscation is carried out by the Corruption Eradication Commission, this can hinder law enforcement in eradicating criminal acts of corruption and can also affect the independence of the Eradication of Corruption Crimes within the Corruption Eradication Commission Institution.
Legal Protection for Copyright of Collaborative Content on Social Media: The Role and Strength of Treaty Law in Determining Ownership and Use Anggo Doyoharjo; FX. Hastowo Broto Laksito; Kesya Zhalibina Sunarto
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Januari: Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v3i1.2817

Abstract

The development of social media has given rise to a new form of digital creative work thru collaboration between influencers and brands, known as brand collaboration. This phenomenon poses new challenges to the copyright legal system, particularly regarding the determination of ownership and legal protection of collaboratively generated content. This research aims to analyze how legal protection for social media content copyright is applied within the context of digital cooperation, and to what extent agreements play a role in determining the ownership and utilization of economic rights to such works. The research method used is normative juridical with a conceptual and legislative approach, which examines the provisions in Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, contract related regulations, and international principles in the Berne Convention and the WIPO Copyright Treaty. The research results indicate that legal protection for collaborative content on social media is not yet optimal due to weak legal awareness and minimal contractual regulation between the parties. Written agreements have proven to play a strategic role in providing legal certainty over moral and economic rights, while also serving as a tool to prevent disputes and misuse of content. Therefore, it is necessary to develop more explicit digital collaboration contract guidelines and provide legal education for creative industry players so that copyright protection in Indonesia can be effective, adaptable, and equitable in the digital economy era.
Notary Responsibility for Legally Defective Deeds: Analysis of the Principle of Due Diligence in the Performance of Public Official Duties Triwanto Triwanto; Alya Maya Khonsa Rahayu; FX. Hastowo Broto Laksito; Lintang Cahya Primadani
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Januari: Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v3i1.2822

Abstract

This article comprehensively discusses the responsibility of notary for legally defective deeds, with an emphasis on the application of the principle of prudence as the foundation of the notary profession's professionalism and integrity. This research uses a normative legal method with a legislative, conceptual, and case approach to analyze the relationship between notary negligence and the resulting civil liability consequences. The study results indicate that the principle of prudence plays a central role in determining the limits of a notary's legal liability, as any negligent action in verifying identity, document validity, or the substance of the deed can cause legal harm to the parties. Conversely, if the notary can prove that their actions were in accordance with legal procedures and professional ethical standards, they can be absolved of civil liability claims. Additionally, this research also highlights the importance of applying the principle of due diligence in the context of the digitalization of notarial services, which demands stricter verification and authentication. Thus, the principle of prudence not only serves as a legal principle but also as a moral foundation that guaranties justice, certainty, and legal protection for society, as well as upholding the dignity of the notarial profession.
Electoral Justice in Indonesia's Presidential System: A Normative Study of the Presidential Threshold and Constitutional Court Decision No. 14/PUU-XI/2013 Santoso Budi Nursal Umar; FX. Hastowo Broto Laksito; Lintang Cahya Primadani
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Januari: Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v3i1.2827

Abstract

This research aims to normatively analyze the legal basis, rationality, and implications of the presidential threshold on the multi-party system and the principle of electoral justice in Indonesia, with a focus on Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013. Thru a normative legal approach, this research examines the provisions of Article 222 of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections and the Constitutional Court's constitutional arguments in maintaining the presidential nomination threshold. The analysis results show that although formally the presidential threshold is an open and legitimate legal policy, it substantially creates political inequality and limits the participation of small parties in the multi-party system. The Constitutional Court's decision is considered not fully reflective of the principles of electoral justice and popular sovereignty, as it prioritizes government stability over political equality. Therefore, it is necessary to reformulate the presidential candidacy threshold policy to make it more proportional, inclusive, and aligned with the principles of constitutional democracy. This reform is expected to strengthen the legitimacy of Indonesia's presidential system without neglecting the fundamental values of justice and political representation of the people.  
Open Legal Policy in Constitutional Court Decisions: Constitutional Limits and Its Issues in the Indonesian State Administration System Lusia Indrastuti; F.X. Hastowo Broto Laksito
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Maret : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i1.2911

Abstract

The doctrine of open legal policy is a jurisprudential construction of the Constitutional Court that provides space for lawmakers to formulate norms as long as they do not contradict the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Nevertheless, the application of this doctrine in the practice of law testing has raised various constitutional problems, particularly concerning the limits of authority between legislators and the Constitutional Court, as well as the protection of citizens' constitutional rights. This research aims to analyze the concept and construction of open legal policy within the Indonesian constitutional system and to formulate the constitutional limits of its application in Constitutional Court decisions. This research is a normative legal study with an approach based on legislation, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The legal materials used include the 1945 Constitution, relevant legislation, and pertinent Constitutional Court decisions. The research results indicate that open legal policy cannot be interpreted as absolute freedom for lawmakers, but must be limited by the principle of constitutional supremacy, protection of constitutional rights, and the principle of proportionality as reflected in Article 28J paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. The ambiguity of the parameters for applying this doctrine has the potential to cause inconsistencies in rulings and disrupt legal certainty. Therefore, a more precise and consistent formulation of constitutional limits is necessary to maintain the balance between representative democracy and constitutional oversight.
Analisis Hukum Normatif terhadap Kedudukan Jaksa sebagai Dominus Litis dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Hanyfa Rahesti Lerian; Nadhifa Yolanda Rachmat; Zhabilla Eka Arindra Putri; Siti Sholekhah; Mawar Dwi Wahyu Sejati; FX. Hastowo Broto Laksito
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v3i3.1779

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the position of the public prosecutor as dominus litis within the Indonesian criminal justice system and to examine its implications for the principles of legal certainty, justice, and legal utility. The concept of dominus litis places the public prosecutor as the controller of criminal cases, possessing the authority to determine the continuation of the prosecution process. Therefore, the prosecutor plays a crucial role in establishing an effective and fair criminal justice system. This research employs a normative legal research method using both a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The data consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which are analyzed qualitatively through a library research method. The study focuses on the regulation of prosecutorial authority as stipulated in Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Public Prosecution Service of the Republic of Indonesia, the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code, and various relevant legal doctrines and theories. The findings reveal that the legal framework governing the position of the public prosecutor as dominus litis has not been explicitly and comprehensively formulated in statutory regulations. As a result, the prosecutor's authority as the controller of criminal cases remains partial and has not been implemented optimally. This condition affects the realization of legal certainty, creates the potential for injustice due to uncontrolled discretion, and limits the achievement of legal utility in criminal justice practice. Therefore, a more comprehensive, integrated, and reform-oriented legal framework is required to strengthen the prosecutor's authority as dominus litis in order to support the development of an effective, fair, and legally certain criminal justice system.
Criminal Liability for Dangerous Challenge Content on Social Media Causing Accidents from the Perspective of the New Criminal Code Endang Yuliana Susilawati; Kartika Asmanda Putri; Supriyanta Supriyanta; FX. Hastowo Broto Laksito; Isabel Naftali Fabian Putri
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v3i3.3069

Abstract

The development of social media has given rise to the phenomenon of digital challenges, which in practice are not only entertaining but also have the potential to cause accidents, serious injuries, and even death. This condition raises legal issues regarding the criminal liability of both the creators and disseminators of dangerous content on social media. This research aims to analyze criminal liability for perpetrators of social media challenge content that causes accidents and to examine the problems of law enforcement and criminal law policy regarding harmful content in the digital space. The research uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach and a conceptual approach thru the analysis of Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code, Law Number 1 of 2024 on the Second Amendment to the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, as well as other related regulations. The research results show that criminal liability for social media challenge content creators can be constructed thru provisions regarding negligence, criminal participation, and the dissemination of electronic information that harms the public. However, law enforcement still faces various obstacles, such as the absence of specific regulations regarding harmful content, difficulties in proving causal relationships, and weak supervision of digital platforms. Therefore, there is a need for an update to the criminal law policy that is more adaptive and comprehensive in order to provide legal protection to society in the digital era.