Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Ulil Albab

Kajian Viktimologis Terhadap Korban Jiwa Akibat Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Di Wilayah Hukum Kepolisian Daerah Nusa Tenggara Timur Ivan, Ivan Yafferson Kadja; Adrianus Djara Dima; Sigit Prabowo Sonbait
ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 5 No. 6: Mei 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jim.v5i6.16899

Abstract

This study is motivated by the high number of traffic accidents resulting in fatalities within the jurisdiction of the Regional Police of East Nusa Tenggara, as well as the importance of legal protection for victims from a victimological perspective. Based on this background, the research problems are formulated as follows: (1) How is the legal protection for fatal victims of traffic accidents within the jurisdiction of the Regional Police of East Nusa Tenggara? (2) What are the obstacles in providing legal protection for such victims in the region? The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the forms of legal protection and the obstacles encountered in efforts to protect victims of fatal traffic accidents. The research method used is an empirical juridical approach with a qualitative method. Data were obtained through interviews and document studies conducted at the Traffic Directorate of the Regional Police of East Nusa Tenggara and PT Jasa Raharja. The data were analyzed descriptively and qualitatively to comprehensively describe the legal protection for fatal victims and the obstacles encountered in practice. The results of the study indicate that legal protection for victims of fatal traffic accidents is carried out through three forms, namely compensation (damages), restitution, and state compensation. Damages are provided by the offender to the victim’s family, restitution is granted through court decisions as a form of the offender’s responsibility, while compensation is provided by the state through PT Jasa Raharja as a form of social security. However, in practice, there are still several obstacles, such as lack of public awareness, administrative constraints, the limited economic capacity of offenders, and suboptimal coordination among institutions. This study is expected to contribute to the development of criminal law and victimology, as well as serve as a reference for law enforcement agencies and the government in improving legal protection for victims of traffic accidents in the future.
Tinjauan Viktimologis Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Pencurian Kalung Emas Dengan Kekerasan Di Kampung Tunu Katega, Kecamatan Kota Waikabubak, Kabupaten Sumba Barat (Studi Kasus Di Kepolisian Resor Sumba Barat) Zefanya, Zefanya Rambu Moha Lende; Orpa Ganefo Manuain; Adrianus Djara Dima
ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 5 No. 6: Mei 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jim.v5i6.17138

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of victims and the forms of legal protection provided to victims in cases of violent gold necklace theft occurring in Kampung Tunu Katega, Waikabubak City District, West Sumba Regency. The research employs an empirical method with a case approach, using primary data obtained through interviews with investigators from the West Sumba Police and the victim, as well as secondary data from documents and relevant legal regulations. The results indicate that the victim’s role in the incident is situational, referring to certain conditions that indirectly create opportunities for the offender to commit the crime. These factors include wearing conspicuous gold jewelry in public places, the victim’s presence in public spaces without adequate supervision, and a lack of awareness of potential criminal threats. From a victimological perspective, the victim can be classified as an unrelated victim, precipitate victim, and victimizable. Furthermore, legal protection for the victim in this case has been partially implemented through compensation provided by the offender, facilitated by the police. However, the compensation did not fully cover the victim’s losses. The mechanisms of restitution and state compensation were not utilized due to their perceived complexity and lengthy procedures, leading the victim to prioritize the prosecution and punishment of the offender. This study concludes that legal protection for victims has not been fully effective, as it remains focused on punishing the offender, while the recovery of the victim has not been optimally fulfilled. Therefore, improvements in the implementation of victim protection mechanisms are necessary to achieve more balanced justice. .