Resti Utami
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Source of Authority for Implementing Educational Supervision Wulan Oktarina; Aisyah Khairunnisa; Resti Utami; Ellen Okta Divy; Kasinyo Harto; Choirun Niswah
Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Enrekang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33487/edumaspul.v7i2.7293

Abstract

Various educational problems in Indonesia can be studied by supervising education. Educational supervision is a process of assistance and support given to teachers in developing their abilities consisting of knowledge, skills, and creativity in teaching and commitment or motivation as a teacher. This study aims to examine and describe the source of authority for implementing educational supervision. This research is a literature study research. The results of this study state that in its implementation, the source of authority for the implementation of educational supervision in schools is carried out by the Principal or school supervisor, called a supervisor, who serves as a supervisor and controller of teacher performance. This supervision and control is carried out so that the teacher does not deviate from the role of teacher or educator. Based on the National Education System Law No. 20 of 2003, the principal or school supervisor supervises to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of learning. In this case, the principal or school supervisor is an illustration that a supervisor must have an official position that has authority or authority in supervising education.
Inkrementalism as One of The Models of Change in The Organization of Education Resti Utami; Nyayu Khodijah; Febriyanti Febriyanti
Sustainable Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Sustainable
Publisher : Lembaga Penjaminan Mutu, IAIN Syaikh Abdurrahman Siddik Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32923/kjmp.v6i1.4030

Abstract

The purpose of writing this journal is to examine models of change in organizations and find out whether incremental models can be used as solutions for change and development. This article selects literature study research methods and some previous research sources, and this study concludes that organizations must meet the basic principles in decision-making, namely ethics, orientation, scope, authority, credibility, and reference. In this case, organizational decisions are taken using several paradigms, namely the classical paradigm, administrative paradigm, incremental paradigm, administrative-incremental paradigm, and contingency paradigm. This article emphasizes that changing the organization is certainly not easy, especially for organizations with many times and a thick tradition. Most organizations make changes only to the vision and mission but not to the individuals and mindsets of their members. Any change can positively or negatively impact the organization's internal and external environment. Of course, each organization member has a different mindset, and each individual must have different initial goals when first joining an organization. Therefore, a change must be flexible, effective, and accommodate all the wishes of organizational members, not just some groups.