Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.983
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal NOMOI Law Review Jurnal Kajian Stratejik Ketahanan Nasional Amicus Curiae
Iskandar, Anang
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Faktor-Faktor yang Menyebabkan Klien Drop Out dari Program Rehabilitasi Rawat Jalan di Klinik Pratama BNN di Wilayah Jawa Barat Mirianty, Widiana; Rofii, Muhammad Syaroni, Mr.; Iskandar, Anang
Jurnal Kajian Stratejik Ketahanan Nasional Vol. 4, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Identifying the risk for early dropout of the program may help to improve the retention in treatment, thereby also having an impact on better recovery outcome (Basu et al., 2017). Drug trafficking and narcotics abuse destructed young generation who are potential in developing country, are a threat to stability of national security. This study aims to identify and understand the factors that cause client dropout from the outpatient program at Primary Clinic of BNN in West Java. The result found that dropout at Primary Clinic of BNN in West Java was influenced by the stability of social condition factor, rehabilitation history, and motivation to change. Treatment related factors in the form of consideration for the client’s needs also have an impact to drop out even not significantly. Keywords: Drop out, Rehabilitation, Outpatient Program
Ketahanan Sosial Masyarakat di Kawasan Rawan Narkotika : Studi Kasus di Kampung Muara Bahari Tanjung Priok Jakarta Utara Rahmawati, Fika Dewi; Hanita, Margaretha; Iskandar, Anang
Jurnal Kajian Stratejik Ketahanan Nasional Vol. 4, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In accordance with the mandate of the Narcotics Law Number 35 of 2009, the community has the right and obligation to make efforts to prevent the eradication of narcotics abuse and illicit trafficking (P4GN) in their environment. Through this research, the researcher wants to see how the social resilience of the community in vulnerable areas, especially in Muara Bahari Village, faces the threat of narcotics crime. This research was conducted through a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis. Data were collected through observation and interviews with informants consisting of community leaders, government officials and security forces. It was found that the condition of the people in Muara Bahari Village had economic and social vulnerabilities which then triggered the emergence of narcotics crimes in the area. These conditions make the community also vulnerable to using narcotics and also being involved in the narcotics business. The condition of the social resilience of the people in Muara Bahari Village in general is still weak. Some areas in Muara Bahari Village have started to actively carry out prevention and eradication efforts independently, but some other areas are still passive. This can be seen in the dimensions of social resilience: coping capacity; adaptive capacity; and transformative capacity. Keywords: Narcotics, Narcotics Prone Areas, Narcotics Crime, Organized Crime, Social Security
PEMBERIAN SANKSI TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA MEMBELI DAN MENYALAHGUNAKAN NARKOTIKA GOLONGAN I BUKAN TANAMAN: Giving Sanctions Against the Crime of Buying and Misusing Narcotics Group I Non-Plants Furqon, Mohamad Insan; Iskandar, Anang
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19799

Abstract

Sanctions for the crime of narcotics abuse for oneself are mostly carried out by imposing prison sentences as in case number 287/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Dgl which is subject to criminal sanctions for 2 years. The issues raised are 1) Is the imposition of sanctions against the perpetrators of the crime of buying and abusing Narcotics Group I non-plants in accordance with Article 127 of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics? 2. What is the reason for the Judge not imposing a Rehabilitation Sanction? The method in this study uses a normative legal research type with an analytical descriptive research type. The data used are secondary data obtained through literature studies and then analyzed qualitatively, drawing conclusions using deductive logic. The results of the study showed that the sentence given by the panel of judges to the defendant was inappropriate because it violated the purpose of the Narcotics Law, namely to guarantee arrangements for medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation for narcotics abusers and addicts as stated in Article 4 letter d Law Number 35 of 2009 , then the judge who decides the case does not pay attention to the provisions referred to in Articles 54, 55 and Article 103. The judge's consideration in imposing a prison sentence solely so that the defendant gets a deterrent effect is contrary to the purpose of the Narcotics Law, namely guaranteeing rehabilitation efforts for abusers and addicts narcotics.
PEMIDANAAN PENGGUNA NARKOTIKA GOLONGAN I BAGI DIRINYA SENDIRI (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 175/PID.SUS/2021/PN.PTI): Punishment Of Class I Narcotics Users For Themselves (Study Decision Number 175/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.PTI Mukhlis, Ryan Arbi Putra; Iskandar, Anang
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19802

Abstract

- Abuse and illicit trafficking of narcotics in correctional institutions has increased significantly. In 2021 there were 148 cases of narcotics smuggling into correctional institutions. The distribution of narcotics in prisons is known as a correctional institution-based distribution pattern and involves prisoners who are still undergoing the punishment process for narcotics. The main problem in this article is whether judge's decision no. 175/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Pti which imposes prison sentences on perpetrators of criminal acts of abusing narcotics is appropriate based on Law no. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, (2) what were the judge's considerations in decision No. 175/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Pti did not impose a sentence to undergo rehabilitation. The research method used is a normative-descriptive research method, which is collected using secondary data, then analyzed qualitatively, and conclusions drawn deductively. The conclusion of this research is that prison sentences for class I narcotics abusers are inappropriate based on Law no. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics (Study Decision Number 175/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn. Pti), and that the Decision of the Panel of Judges Number 175/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Pti which imposed a prison sentence of 10 (ten) months has not been precisely with the aim of punishing narcotics abusers
THE DILEMMA OF ENFORCEMENT OF JUSTICE REHABILITATION FOR DRUG ABUSERS: A STUDY OF PRACTICES AND REGULATIONS Agus Darmawan, M. Dandi; Josias Simon Runturambi, Arthur; Iskandar, Anang
NOMOI Law Review Vol 6, No 2 (2025): November Edition
Publisher : NOMOI Law Review

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/nomoi.v6i2.27429

Abstract

Law enforcement against drug abusers in Indonesia has tended to be oriented towards a repressive and punitive approach. This approach prioritizes imprisonment as the primary solution, without clearly distinguishing between pure criminals and drug abuse victims who actually need rehabilitation. As a result, correctional institutions are filled with drug users with high recidivism rates, while the goals of social recovery and public health are often neglected. This research is a normative juridical study with a statute approach. The results of the discussion indicate that although the rehabilitation justice approach aims to rehabilitate users and restore social relationships, its implementation is often hampered by a legal paradigm that still prioritizes the deterrent effect, limited understanding among law enforcement officials, a lack of rehabilitation facilities, public stigma, and weak coordination between relevant agencies. To strengthen the implementation of rehabilitation justice for drug abusers in Indonesia, it is necessary to improve understanding and training for law enforcement officials, strengthen coordination between relevant agencies, and expand rehabilitation facilities equitably, including the development of community-based programs. 
Co-Authors Agus Darmawan, M. Dandi Furqon, Mohamad Insan Hanita, Margaretha Josias Simon Runturambi, Arthur Mirianty, Widiana Muhammad Syaroni Rofii Mukhlis, Ryan Arbi Putra Rahmawati, Fika Dewi