Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Vifada Assumption Journal of Law
Tantimin Tantimin
Faculty of Law, Universitas Internasional Batam, Indonesia
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Precarious Struggle to Criminalize Radicalization and Terrorism Doctrine Actions Tantimin Tantimin; Shenti Agustini; Febri Jaya; David Tan
Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Vol 7, No 2 (2023): September 2023
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25072/jwy.v7i2.4210

Abstract

Radicalism and terrorism are closely related as threats to peace and harmony, as bothare flawed manifestations of religious values and ideologies. The radicalization processcarried out by members of various terror organizations in Indonesia has not receivedmuch attention and hasn’t been responded with concrete efforts to stop its spread asthe precursor to terrorism. The normative legal research method is used in this studyto analyze the positive elements and purposes of regulations related to the educationalsystem, free speech, and radicalism prevention in Indonesia. Findings of this studyillustrate the legal urgency in Indonesia to carry out normative construction regardingthe criminalization process of radicalization, as well as its limitations and obstacles,as part of the effort to prevent criminal acts of terrorism. As a point of prevention andresistance to the spread of radicalism and terrorism in Indonesia, this criminalizationprocess is juxtaposed with the existing education system.
Anti-Money Laundering Regulations in the Crypto-Based Fintech Sector of Indonesia and Malaysia: Lessons from the European Union Triana Dewi Seroja; Elysia Monica Anggelina; Tantimin Tantimin
Vifada Assumption Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): January - June
Publisher : Yayasan Vifada Cendikia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70184/6f0gqs33

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze and compare anti-money laundering (AML) regulations in the crypto-based fintech sectors of Indonesia and Malaysia, using the European Union (EU) as a benchmark for best practices. The EU is chosen as a benchmark primarily due to potential concrete lessons from the MiCA framework and AML Directives. This benchmark also serves as the main element of novelty, as it combines comparative analysis of Indonesia and Malaysia with the assessment of the EU’s regulatory advantages under its harmonized crypto-asset regulatory model. Research Design and Methodology: The research employs a normative doctrinal legal method with statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches, relying on qualitative analysis of secondary legal materials. Findings and Discussion: The findings reveal that although Indonesia and Malaysia have established AML frameworks, both face significant challenges in regulatory effectiveness, particularly due to fragmented supervision, limited coordination, and gaps between regulation and implementation. In contrast, the European Union demonstrates a more comprehensive and harmonized regulatory model through instruments such as MiCA and AML Directives, which enhance transparency, cross-border cooperation, and regulatory adaptability. Implications: These findings imply that Indonesia and Malaysia need to adopt and contextualize EU best practices by strengthening institutional integration, improving regulatory coherence, and enhancing compliance mechanisms to ensure a more effective and resilient AML regime in the evolving digital financial landscape.
Co-Authors Agustini, Shenti Elysia Monica Anggelina Jaya, Febri Tan, David Triana Dewi Seroja