Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal At-Tafkir Syarah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Ekonomi International Journal of Sharia Studies
Nurul Husna
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Langsa
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
HALAL TOURISM IN THAILAND: BETWEEN POLITICAL ECONOMY AND GOVERNMENT CONCERN Nurul Husna; Risatul kautsari; Andi Faradiba Irfan
International Journal of Sharia Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): International Journal of Sharia Studies
Publisher : Tunas Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61810/ijss.v1i2.152

Abstract

Halal tourism is an income source in a number of Muslim countries. It's just that the halal tourism trend is also emerging in Muslim minority countries such as Thailand. Currently Thailnd is developing a halal tourism project with various products, such as providing sharia hotels, and halal food menus since being on airlines such as: Thai Airways. The critical question examined in this research is whether efforts to develop halal products and sharia banking are a government concern for Islamic law, or are they merely political-economic interests to reap financial benefits from Muslim consumers. This research uses a qualitative approach, sourced from online literature, journals and websites that are relevant to halal tourism studies. In this way, this article can see the extent to which the halal tourism policy is being implemented in Thailand, and its impact on the tourism sector. The results of this research show that the Thai government is pursuing halal tourism not because they are concerned about Islamic law, but only for the benefit and political-economic interests.
Reinterpreting Mediation Success: Partial Agreements as Outcome-Based Justice in Divorce Cases at the Langsa Sharia Court Nurul Husna; Muhazir Muhazir
Syarah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Ekonomi Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): SYARAH : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Ekonomi
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah Universitas Islam Negeri Sultanah Nahrasiyah Lhokseumawe

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47766/syarah.v15i1.7799

Abstract

The success of divorce mediation in Indonesia has traditionally been measured by the achievement of full reconciliation between the disputing parties. Although Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 recognizes the possibility of partial agreements (kesepakatan sebagian) during mediation, the administrative case-reporting system of the Religious Courts, namely the Case Tracking Information System (Sistem Informasi Penelusuran Perkara/SIPP), continues to treat full reconciliation as the primary indicator of mediation success. Consequently, partial agreements that substantively resolve the parties' post-divorce rights and obligations are not proportionately reflected in the evaluation of mediation performance. This research employs an empirical juridical method using a legal sociology approach based on Eugen Ehrlich’s theory of living law. The study explores the interaction between normative legal provisions and mediation practices that develop within judicial institutions. Data were collected through interviews, document analysis, and the examination of relevant legal regulations and academic literature. The analysis focuses on agreements concerning iddah maintenance, mut’ah, past maintenance (madhiyah), child custody (hadhanah), and child support. The findings indicate that partial agreements provide legal certainty regarding the rights and obligations of the parties and significantly reduce the potential for post-divorce conflict. Although such agreements do not result in reconciliation, they demonstrate the substantive function of mediation in resolving disputes and ensuring fairness. From the perspective of living law, these practices reflect a broader understanding of mediation success beyond the formal objective of preserving marriage. The findings indicate that, although partial agreements are recognized under Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016, they remain insufficiently reflected in administrative measures of mediation success. This study argues that mediation effectiveness should therefore be assessed not only by marital reconciliation but also by substantive legal outcomes that protect post-divorce rights and promote outcome-based justice.
The Construction of Satan’s Weltanschauung in the Qur’an: Toshihiko Izutsu’s Semantic Approach Nurul Husna; Irfansyah Irfansyah
At-Tafkir Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): At-Tafkir
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LP2M) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/at.v19i1.15906

Abstract

For centuries, shaytan in Islamic discourse has generally been understood as a single entity with a fixed meaning, a perception inherited from classical exegetical traditions that primarily rely on atomistic verse-by-verse interpretations. Although studies employing Toshihiko Izutsu's semantic approach have expanded in Indonesia, no previous research has comprehensively analyzed shaytan using Izutsu's complete semantic framework, encompassing semantic fields, diachronic development, and the Qur'anic worldview. This study aims to examine the semantic structure of shaytan through Izutsu's semantic methodology in order to reconstruct its conceptual meaning within the Qur'an. The research adopts a qualitative hermeneutic-semantic approach, using the Qur'an as the primary source and classical Arabic lexicons, biblical texts, Israelite literature, and relevant scholarly works as supporting data. The findings demonstrate that shaytan is not merely a proper name but an existential category denoting persistent estrangement from divine truth. Synchronically, it occupies a hierarchical position within the Qur'anic semantic system as the antithesis of divine guidance, while diachronically the Qur'an reinterprets pre-Islamic and biblical traditions by introducing a distinctive ethical narrative centered on istikbar (arrogance) as the root of rebellion. These findings contribute to Qur'anic semantic studies by expanding Izutsu's framework and demonstrating that the Qur'anic weltanschauung conceptualizes shaytan as a multidimensional moral category emphasizing human responsibility, gradual psychological temptation, asymmetric dualism, and humanity's continuing capacity to resist evil.
Co-Authors Andi Faradiba Irfan Irfansyah Irfansyah Muhazir, Muhazir Risatul kautsari