Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tahdis: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Hadis QOF: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir Al-Karim: International Journal of Quranic and Islamic Studies
Mahdi Afandi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Komparatif Syahadah dan Riwayah Mahdi Afandi; Dzatan Najma
Tahdis: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Hadis Vol 14 No 2 (2023): Tahdis
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/tahdis.v14i2.39023

Abstract

Hadith is the second primary source after the Koran, some even position it on a par with the Koran. In the study of hadith there are many things that can be studied, one of which is the study of history. This method of transmission which is only owned by Muslims makes Islamic scholarship maintain its authenticity by using the standards of narrators that must be 'fair and ḍabit. Among the scholars of hadith there is also something called the shahadah or testimony which is often compared to riwayah. In this article the author will try to compare the shahadah and narrations using the descriptive-analytic method with the aim of knowing the similarities and differences between the two. The results of this study indicate that the shahadah and riwayah are both conveying information with the aim of establishing something that requires the perpetrators to be Muslim, mukallaf, just and ḍabit. While the difference is that the shahadah must be an independent person, not blind, the number is determined, there is no kinship and it must be submitted to uphold the truth. While the narrations do not question this and are more general in nature, they may be slaves, blind, regardless of gender, do not question kinship relations, not on specific matters, but these narrations are more prophetic in nature.
Qira’ah Variations and Qur'anic Meanings: An Analysis of Imam Hamzah's Thought Mahdi Afandi; Abdullah Fahmi
Al-Karim: International Journal of Quranic and Islamic Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Al-Karim: International Journal of Quranic and Islamic Studies, September
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/al-karim.v1i2.3986

Abstract

The Quran was revealed in Arabic, chosen as the exclusive language to convey its divine message. However, the Arabic used in the Quran encompasses multiple dialects and pronunciations, reflecting its revelation in seven modes (ahruf), which facilitated comprehension for non-Arab readers. This study aims to analyze the influence of Qiraat diversity on Quranic interpretation, with a particular focus on the Qiraat of Imam Hamzah. This research employs a descriptive qualitative method with a library research approach, gathering data from classical and contemporary sources. By systematically examining the linguistic and grammatical aspects of Imam Hamzah’s Qiraat, this study highlights its distinctive characteristics compared to other Qiraat, including variations in i‘rab, root words, syntax, and pronunciation. The findings reveal that Imam Hamzah’s Qiraat significantly contributes to the interpretation of Quranic verses, particularly those concerning legal provisions (ayat ahkam). While some of his readings are unique, others align closely with the Qiraat of Al-Kisai or Abu Bakr from ‘Asim. These variations offer deeper insights into the flexibility and richness of Quranic recitation and its interpretive impact.Theoretically, this study underscores the role of Qiraat in shaping legal and theological exegesis, demonstrating how phonetic and grammatical nuances influence meaning. It contributes to Quranic studies by providing a comprehensive analysis of Imam Hamzah’s Qiraat and its implications for the understanding of Islamic jurisprudence and linguistic diversity in the Quran. Contribution: This study contributes to Quranic studies by demonstrating how Imam Hamzah’s Qiraat influences legal interpretation and linguistic diversity, enriching scholarly discourse on the interplay between recitation and exegesis.
Discourse on the Best Interpretation Model: A Critical Review of Traditional Exegesis Products in the Early Era Mahdi Afandi; Abd. Kholid; Mursyid, Achmad Yafik
QOF Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Keiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/qof.v7i1.1014

Abstract

In addition to interpreting the Qur'an through rational reasoning (ra'yi), scholars also employ an interpretive approach based on narrations, known as the bi al-ma’thūr interpretation. This form of interpretation is esteemed by Ibn Taimiyah and Ibn Kathir and carries high validity and evidential support. To such an extent, outcomes from the bi al-ma'ṡur interpretation are obligatory and not to be disregarded. This study critically analyzes and validates the bi al-ma’thūr interpretation model that emerged in the mutaqaddimīn era. The focus is on two seminal interpretations, namely "Jāmi' al-Bayān an Ta’wīl Ȃyi al-Qur'ān" by Muhammad bin Jarīr al-Ṭabarī (d. 310 H.) and "Bahr al-‘Ulūm" by Naṣr ibn Muhammad al-Samarqandi (d. 375 H.). This research employs an analytical descriptive approach and falls under library research since primary data source originates from literature within libraries. The research includes verification, used to reevaluate principles and methods of interpretation in relation to contemporary relevance. Findings reveal that despite being considered the best, the bi al-ma’thūr interpretation model exhibits problematic deficiencies. Among these are weak and even questionable authenticity (munkar) in narrations, often with lacking isnads, making distinguishing between reliable (ṣaḥīḥ) and weak (ḍa'īf) challenging. Many narrations include israiliyat (Jewish and Christian narratives) sans commentary or selective narrators, citing negatively-viewed sources. Therefore, interpreting this model is advised to be avoided by audiences lacking expertise in riwayah and dirayah (methods of narration and interpretation).
Co-Authors Abd. Kholid Abdullah Fahmi Dzatan Najma Mursyid, Achmad Yafik