Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

An Ideational Metafunction Analysis of President Joko Widodo’s Speech on Crude Palm Oil (CPO) Policies Putra, Febi Rahmad; Zulprianto; Sawirman
SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : STAIN Sultan Abdurrahman Kepulauan Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35961/salee.v5i1.1065

Abstract

The purpose of this research is explaining the ideational function of the two speeches by President Jokowi about Crude Palm Oil (CPO) Policies. The design of this research was descriptive qualitative research. The data for this study constituted two speeches President Joko Widodo about crude palm oil (CPO) exports on two different occasions at State Secretariat website (https://www.setneg.go.id) that was obtained by copying and pasting. The speeches were analysed by using systemic functional linguistics methods that is focused to ideational metafunction (experiential meaning and logical meaning). The result of the analysis was both of speech Joko Widodo revealing the similarity. Speech A showed mental process dominant in experiential meaning and speech B also showed mental process dominant. Beside the similarity both of speech, Jokowi speech revealed the differential using participant (senser), speech A used word of pemerintah, and on speech B using word of saya. Using word of pemerintah was a form of Jokowi as President not wanting to be blamed when bad things happen in made crude palm oil’s policy. Therefore, using word of saya was imaging form of Jokowi, because his clause gave profit for his electability. Jokowi was very careful in publishing speech, word of very careful reflected as self-righteousness.
Theme-Rheme Analysis in Probing Google’s Coercion Trespassing User’s Privacy; A Forensic Linguistics Research Lesmana, Sabtra; Sawirman; Usman, Fajri
IJOLTL (Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): January
Publisher : Center of Language and Cultural Studies [CLCS]

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30957/ijoltl.v7i1.691

Abstract

This research constitutes a mixture of multidisciplinary between linguistics with forensic. It represents the clause analysis through the use of theme-rheme in probing the user's privacy violations in Google's user privacy policy agreement: a forensic linguistics research. It is aimed to reveal and explain the violations conducted by Google to its user privacy which is implied through its text agreement by analyzing it with Theme and Rheme focus. This qualitative research is done by applying the documentation recording method in collecting data and the Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics theory specifically theme-rheme. The result of the data is presented in the table analysis and in the form of descriptive interpretation. The result showed that Google build its clauses with the 4 types of theme construction. From 73 analyzed clauses, the dominantly built clause is the single constituent with marked theme where “We” is the mostly occurred subject with 31 occurences. Yet, Google applied unmarked theme mosty in their 38 clauses. With this dominant occurences of “We”, Google construe its existence as the authority holders of the whole agreement. The researchers found that similar finite predicator appeared repeatedly such “collect” and “use” in building its clauses. These constitute Google’s strategy in order to force the user’s permission to let Google freely access their privacy. In addition, the operation of the conjunction “And”, extention, expansion and exemplificatory constituents represent the plentiful request of Google related to its user’s information. Those summarized the violation conducted by Google to its user’s privacy.
A Transitivity Analysis of Discourses in George W. Bush and Scott Morrison’s Speeches on ‘War on Terror’ Suryani, Irma; Sawirman
Andalas International Journal of Socio-Humanities Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/aijosh.v3i1.15

Abstract

This article is a continuation of the article entitled Comparing Discourses in George W. Bush and Scott Morrison’s Speeches on ‘war on terror’ about the transitivity systems, including types of processes, participant functions, and circumstance elements, are used in these two speech discourses by George W. Bush and Scott Morrison. This research is qualitative research with a descriptive statistical method that presents linguistic analysis findings in speech discourses about the war on terror. This article aims to identify and explain how George W. Bush and Scott Morrison construct the image of terrorism through the language used in their speech discourses. The analysis uses Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) and utilizes the framework of transitivity analysis, which identifies the ideational meaning embodied by choice of grammar. This study found that George W. Bush uses material processing to show a negative image of terrorism. In addition to the material process, Scott Morrison also uses a verbal process to convey the image of terrorists. The linguistic features in both speech discourses both depict a negative image of terrorists. The findings also prove that the choice of grammar in the two discourses indirectly uses the speaker’s perspective on terrorists, which influences listeners' opinion.
Persuasive Utterances in Selected Tourism Advertisements on Indonesia.Travel YouTube Channel Mardiyah, Siti; Sawirman
Andalas International Journal of Socio-Humanities Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/aijosh.v3i1.19

Abstract

This study aims to identify the mode of persuasion and persuasive strategies used in Indonesia.Travel YouTube Channel. Ten videos among 256 ones were selected as data sources. Data collection was done by the non-participant method. Based on the research, the speakers used 38 persuasive utterances. The modes of persuasion used are pathos and logos. The most dominant mode of persuasion is pathos, with a percentage of 92%. Furthermore, there are three persuasive strategies were found namely: 1) quasilogical was found in 3 utterances (8%), 2) presentational was found in 33 utterances (87%), and 3) repetition was found in 2 utterances (5%). The results showed that the most dominant presentational strategy was found with a percentage of 87%. Therefore, it can be concluded that pathos and presentational strategies are used when speakers want to persuade their listeners by targeting their feelings and emotions.