Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hamalatul Qur'an : Jurnal Ilmu Ilmu Al-Qur'an Wahana Islamika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Iballa, Dona Kahfi Ma
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PERSPEKTIF KESETARAAN DAN KEADILAN GENDER HUSEIN MUHAMMAD DALAM SILANG PENDAPAT KHITAN PEREMPUAN Hikmalisa; Hikmalisa, Hikmalisa; Iballa, Dona Kahfi Ma
Wahana Islamika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): Wahana Islamika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Publisher : STAI Syubbanul Wathon Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61136/emf8d125

Abstract

This article discusses circumcision from a feminist Kiai perspective, Husein Muhammad. This qualitative descriptive study uses a literature study style and uses a gender approach. The results of this study indicate that Husein Muhammad interprets the law of female circumcision by prioritizing the principles of justice and gender equality. For him, circumcision is purely the result of construction by some classical Muslim scholars because nothing in the Qur'an or Hadith can be used as argumentation that indicates its obligation of circumcision for women. In addition, female circumcision damages health, which means this practice is also forbidden in Islam. 
Komparasi Studi Historis-Kritis Al-Qur’an Orientalis (Studi Pemikiran Abraham Geiger, Theodor Nöldeke dan Angelica Neuwirth) Nur, Zunaidi; Iballa, Dona Kahfi Ma; Azima, Muhammad Fauzhan
Hamalatul Qur'an : Jurnal Ilmu Ilmu Alqur'an Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Pondok Pesantren Hamalatul Qur'an Jogoroto Jombang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37985/hq.v5i2.317

Abstract

One of the controversial topics in orientalist studies of the Qur'an is about the similarity of the Qur'an with previous books, especially the Bible. Some orientalists armed with a historical-critical approach produce diverse conclusions regarding the similarity of the Qur'an with the previous book. This study aims to describe the main thoughts of three orientalists, namely Abraham Geiger, Theodor Noldeke, and Angelika Neuwirth regarding the Qur'an through a comparative study. This research is a qualitative research that combines three consecutive methods, namely exploration, explanation, and description-analysis. The result of this study is that although the three orientalists use the same methodology, each orientalist has a different conclusion due to differences in interpretation among the three. In the historical-critical study of the Qur'an, the difference in conclusions between Geiger, Noldeke, and Neuwirth occurs because of the difference in their views of the “blind spot” that causes similarities between the Qur'an and the Bible. Geiger argues that this shows Muhammad's adoption of a unified Arab society. Noldeke sees the difference due to Muhammad's ignorance of valid information, because Muhammad only got oral information and did not refer to the Bible as a primary reference. Meanwhile, Neuwirth argues that this difference actually shows the form of interaction between the Qur'an and the Bible.
Co-Authors Azima, Muhammad Fauzhan Hikmalisa Hikmalisa Nur, Zunaidi