Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PRISMA Minda Baharu Journal on Mathematics Education
Sari, Atika Defita
Unknown Affiliation
Education Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal on Mathematics Education

 1 
Learning obstacle of probability learning based on the probabilistic thinking level Sari, Atika Defita; Suryadi, Didi; Dasari, Dadan
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024): Journal on Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in collaboration with Indonesian Mathematical Society (IndoMS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp207-226

Abstract

This study aims to determine students learning obstacles in probability material based on their probabilistic thinking (PT) level using the theory of didactical situation (TDS) perspective. This is qualitative research with the case study method. The subject consisted of 23 grade 9 students in junior high school who had studied the material and had taken the test. The test results were used to classify students depending on their PT level using the framework developed by Graha A. Jones. Furthermore, interviews were performed with three representative students from each PT level. The interviews indicated that students in each PT level continue to face learning obstacles, which include instrumental ontogenic and epistemological obstacles. The lowest PT level demonstrated a more complex and comprehensive learning obstacle in all constructs of PT. From the TDS perspective, all students who are at various levels of PT have reached an action situation. Only 33% of the students at the subjective level and 83% of the students at the transition level reached the formulation situation. Still, students at that level needed help to reach the other two situations. Unlike the two previous levels, students at the level of quantitative informal thinking can achieve situations of validation and institutionalization.
Co-Authors Dadan Dasari Didi Suryadi Elah Nurlaelah Hermanto Hermanto Ika Wulandari Jauharu, Afifah Latip Rasyid Marfi Ario N. Nurjanah Nurhayati, Lina Puspita, Wita Ratna Ratri Isharyadi, Ratri Riska Novia Sari, Riska Novia Soeleman, M Tri Nova Hasti Yunianta