Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Sengketa Kandidat Calon Perseorangan dalam Pemilihan Umum Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Ketapang Tahun 2020 di Tingkat Kabupaten Masa Perbaikan Gilang Mafliano Rachmatshah; Dyah Hayu Woro Indrasti; Lois Salwa Aurella
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): September : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v2i3.3748

Abstract

This article examines and discusses the Supreme Court judge's decision regarding the results of the Individual Candidate Dispute in the 2020 Ketapang Regent and Deputy Regent General Election at the Regency Level during the Improvement Period. viewed from the perspective of State Administrative Law. seen from the case and the way the judge assesses the case and the judge's decision. In this article we use qualitative research methods, which focus on observation and in-depth research. pay attention to human behavior and what aspects influence it. This is realized by looking at what aspects make the plaintiff object and what aspects influence the judge to make a decision
Tinjauan Sosio-Legal terhadap Pembatalan Hibah Orang Tua kepada Anak dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam di Indonesia Nabila Raihana; Clara Oktaviana; Herfita Ayu Nayla; Kurniawati Dwi Desriana; Sulistiowati Sulistiowati; Dyah Hayu Woro Indrasti; Najwa Aulia Widyaningrum; Ersy Aulia Anggraeni
JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND SOCIAL SCIENCE Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Administrative and Social Science
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jass.v6i1.2106

Abstract

Hibah is a form of voluntary gift given by a person to another while the giver is still alive. In practice, hibah often leads to legal issues, especially when a revocation occurs, which frequently results in disputes between the donor and the recipient. This study employs a normative approach using qualitative methods to examine the causes and legal implications of hibah revocation, as well as the requirements that must be fulfilled for the revocation to be legally valid under Islamic law. The findings indicate that revocation is permissible under certain conditions, such as when the hibah contradicts its intended purpose, exceeds one-third of the donor’s assets, or the recipient commits a breach of agreement. In Islamic law, there are differing opinions among schools of thought regarding the permissibility of revoking hibah given to one’s child. However, according to the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), parents have the right to revoke a hibah at any time. The legal consequences of revoking a hibah include the loss of ownership rights over the gifted property, potential family conflicts, and prolonged litigation processes. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the legal terms and conditions of hibah is essential to avoid future disputes.
BATAS USIA ANAK 18 TAHUN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK DI INDONESIA Aqila Fayyaza Ghafur; Ersy Aulia Anggraeni; Dyah Hayu Woro Indrasti
LONTAR MERAH Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31002/lm.v9i1.4970

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis relevansi batas usia anak 18 tahun sebagai patokan pertanggungjawaban pidana dengan dinamika kasus aktual yang ada di Indonesia. Penelitian hukum normatif diaplikasikan berdasarkan pendekatan undang-undang dan konseptual serta mengaplikasikan teknik studi pustaka yang menganalisa data sekunder meliputi peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur ilmiah. Tinjauan pustaka berdasarkan pada teori pertanggungjawaban pidana dan teori perkembangan kognitif dan moral. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa batas usia 18 tahun tidak sepenuhnya relevan menghadapi realitas lapangan. Walaupun Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak telah mendahulukan keadilan restoratif, tinjauan neurohukum pada perkembangan otak, khususnya fungsi kognitif dan pengendalian impulsif mengindikasikan bahwa kematangan otak belum sempurna pada usia tersebut. Kesenjangan ini didukung oleh konsep Emerging Adulthood yang secara psikologis masih berada dalam transisi dewasa, sehingga memicu ketidakadilan ganda. Simpulan ini menegaskan bahwa batasan usia absolut ini gagal mengakomodir variasi kapasitas mental pelaku sehingga perlu adanya mekanisme pertanggungjawaban pidana berjenjang yang responsif terhadap fakta perkembangan ilmiah. Kata Kunci: Batas Usia Anak, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Emerging Adulthood