Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Siti Anisah Nasution
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Studi Perbandingan Sistem Peradilan Indonesia Dan Malaysia Lala Anggina Salsabila; Siti Anisah Nasution; Febby Oktavia Br. Tarigan; Sri Hadiningrum
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): April :Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v2i2.2515

Abstract

This research is a comparative study of two laws in the world, namely Indonesian law and Malaysian law. The two studies were carried out in comparing the definitions, characteristics, objectives and legal systems of judicial structures. This research aims to compare the two to find possible advantages and disadvantages, especially regarding the criminal justice system as well. By comparing the Malaysian legal system, Indonesia is no worse than Malaysia. In this research it turns out that Indonesia has many advantages, namely people who work and work in the legal field, and therefore it is possible that the rule of law in Indonesia is still better because there are many people who law-abiding. The Indonesian state must create a good legal system, the court structure must take into account the culture of a society like Malaysia, because law enforcement will be more effective if it is in accordance with the values ​​or customs that have been formed in the society itself.
Dampak Kewarganegaraan Ganda Bagi Warga Indonesia Lala Anggina Salsabila; Putri Handayani; Siti Anisah Nasution; Syarifa Aini; Bryan Yamolala Ndruru; Rahmat Fitra; Fazli Rachman
Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): DESEMBER : Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mandub.v1i4.732

Abstract

In Indonesia, every individual has the right to citizenship status, as regulated in Article 28D Paragraph 4 of the 1945 Constitution which states that "every person has the right to citizenship status." Even though Law Number 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia in principle does not recognize dual citizenship, several legal experts and activists have proposed that Indonesia provide protection for mixed marriage families by implementing the principle of dual citizenship. This article aims to determine the impact of dual citizenship on Indonesian citizens. The research method used is a qualitative approach with library study data analysis techniques. Conceptually, dual citizenship can be interpreted narrowly and broadly. In a narrow sense, dual citizenship refers to the concept of dual citizenship (dual citizenship/nationality) in the status of a person who has two citizenships from two different countries. In a broad sense, dual citizenship is expanded not only to dual citizenship, but also to more than multiple citizenships (plural/multiple citizenship/nationality). In general, dual citizenship can arise due to the application of the principles of citizenship in terms of reciprocal birth (interplay), between the principles of jus sanguinis and jus soli or the naturalization of a citizen of one country to another country.
Co-Authors Bryan Yamolala Ndruru Fazli Rachman Febby Oktavia Br. Tarigan Lala Anggina Salsabila PUTRI HANDAYANI Rahmat Fitra Sri Hadiningrum Syarifa Aini