Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum
Najar Pratama
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kontradiksi Penggunaan Hak Veto Atas Kesetaraan Prinsip Kedaulatan Anggota PBB Mutari Madhuri; Najar Pratama
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): April :Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v2i2.2757

Abstract

The United Nations is an international organization that has very important role in maintaining world peace and security. The United Nations Charter does not provide much explicit regulation regarding Veto rights. the use of the Veto rights is community, and in this research we will discuse the regulations regarding the Veto right and its various relevance in relation to the principle of sovereignty adopted by the United Nations. That basically the regulation of the principles and principle of equality of state sovereignty has been expressly regulated in article 2 paragraph (1) of the UN Charter. The provisions are the basis for carrying out the functions of the UN as an international organization, including the basis for carrying out the functions of its main organ. Therefore, this principle becomes a guide for decision makers in the UN security council until there is no longer any reason to justify the use of the Veto right.
Legal Review Of Breach Of Land Dispute Over Land Sale And Purchase Between Land Owner And PT. Pancapuri Indoperkasa : Serang District Court Decision Number 123/PDT/2025/PN. SRG Mutari Madhuri; M. Nassir Agustiawan; Mohammad Hifni; Najar Pratama; Muhamad Jahiri; Dani Darmawan
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 5 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i5.2300

Abstract

This study examines the legal implications of a breach of contract dispute between a landowner and PT. Pancapuri Indoperkasa, as ruled in Serang District Court Decision Number 123/Pdt/2025/PN.Srg. The research employs a normative juridical approach with a case study method to analyze the application of civil law. Data were obtained from the Supreme Court’s Case Tracking Information System (SIPP), relevant legislation, legal journals, and expert opinions, analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. The findings reveal that PT. Pancapuri Indoperkasa was proven to have defaulted by failing to fulfill payment obligations despite having received the land, which had been delivered more than two years earlier. The court rejected the company’s argument of force majeure due to internal delays in permits and funding changes, affirming that such business risks are the company’s responsibility. The judges confirmed that all elements of breach valid agreement, unfulfilled obligation, delay, loss, and causal relation were legally proven, reflecting the correct application of Articles 1244 1252 of the Civil Code. This decision illustrates the court’s progressive interpretation of pacta sunt servanda and good faith, ensuring protection for the weaker party and achieving substantive justice
Co-Authors Dani Darmawan M. Nassir Agustiawan Mohammad Hifni Muhamad Jahiri Mutari Madhuri