Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research
Putra, Ricko Yorinda
Unknown Affiliation
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Immunology & microbiology Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Effectiveness of Airway Management Strategies in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis Putra, Ricko Yorinda; Novita Anggraeni; Johannas
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 11 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v8i11.1113

Abstract

Background: Airway management is a cornerstone of critical care, but the optimal strategies for critically ill patients remain debated. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various airway management techniques in critically ill patients. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted from January 2018 to December 2023. Studies comparing different airway management strategies (e.g., endotracheal intubation, laryngeal mask airway, video laryngoscopy) in critically ill adults were included. Primary outcomes were successful airway establishment, time to airway securement, and complications (e.g., hypoxia, aspiration). Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models, and the risk of bias was assessed. Results: Twenty-three studies (n=5,894 patients) were included. Video laryngoscopy was associated with a higher success rate of first-pass intubation compared to direct laryngoscopy (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.43-2.40, p<0.001). No significant differences were found in overall complications between video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68-1.24, p=0.59). In patients with difficult airways, video laryngoscopy demonstrated a reduced risk of complications compared to direct laryngoscopy (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.97, p=0.04). Conclusion: Video laryngoscopy is a safe and effective alternative to direct laryngoscopy, particularly in critically ill patients with predicted difficult airways. Further research is needed to determine the optimal airway management strategy in specific subgroups of critically ill patients.
Effectiveness of Airway Management Strategies in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis Putra, Ricko Yorinda; Novita Anggraeni; Johannas
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 11 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v8i11.1113

Abstract

Background: Airway management is a cornerstone of critical care, but the optimal strategies for critically ill patients remain debated. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various airway management techniques in critically ill patients. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted from January 2018 to December 2023. Studies comparing different airway management strategies (e.g., endotracheal intubation, laryngeal mask airway, video laryngoscopy) in critically ill adults were included. Primary outcomes were successful airway establishment, time to airway securement, and complications (e.g., hypoxia, aspiration). Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models, and the risk of bias was assessed. Results: Twenty-three studies (n=5,894 patients) were included. Video laryngoscopy was associated with a higher success rate of first-pass intubation compared to direct laryngoscopy (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.43-2.40, p<0.001). No significant differences were found in overall complications between video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68-1.24, p=0.59). In patients with difficult airways, video laryngoscopy demonstrated a reduced risk of complications compared to direct laryngoscopy (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.97, p=0.04). Conclusion: Video laryngoscopy is a safe and effective alternative to direct laryngoscopy, particularly in critically ill patients with predicted difficult airways. Further research is needed to determine the optimal airway management strategy in specific subgroups of critically ill patients.
Co-Authors Johannas Novita Anggraeni