Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Jurnal Motivasi Pendidikan dan Bahasa
Ida Nurjana Tamba
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Implementasi Perda Kab. Deli Serdang Nomor 4 Tahun 2021 Tentang Pengelolaan Sampah Vinolya Lidevia Br Manik; Ida Nurjana Tamba; Seevaira Chyta Simanullang; Fariz Aditya; Samuel Sihite; Raja Songkup Pratama Siregar
Jurnal Motivasi Pendidikan dan Bahasa Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Desember : Jurnal Motivasi Pendidikan dan Bahasa
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jmpb-widyakarya.v1i4.1972

Abstract

Deli Serdang Regency Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2021 concerning Waste Management is a regional regulation which aims to create a Deli Serdang Regency that is clean, neat, cool and shady. Current human activities cannot be separated from producing organic and non-organic waste, which if not managed properly can cause visual disturbances, threats to public health, and environmental pollution. This research aims to analyze the extent of implementation of Deli Serdang Regency Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2021 concerning Waste Management. This research uses quantitative and qualitative research methods. Quantitative methods were used to analyze data from questionnaires distributed to the public and cleaning staff. Qualitative methods were used to analyze data from observations made at several waste management locations in Deli Serdang Regency. The results of the research show that the implementation of the Deli Serdang Regency Regional Regulation, especially No. 4 of 2021 regarding waste management, can be said to have not been implemented optimally. This is because from observations made and also surveys through distributing questionnaires to the community, it was found that there are still many people in VIII Medan Estate hamlet, most of whom are still unaware of the existence of regulations governing waste management. As a result, local community participation decreases and the community may not be involved in activities such as socialization related to waste management.
Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Pemberatan di Pengadilan Negeri Medan Mantasia Hasibuan; Parlaungan Gabriel Siahaan; Dewi Pika Lbn Batu; Ida Nurjana Tamba; Fariz Aditya; Florensia Silaban
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7031

Abstract

This study aims to examine the judge's considerations in rendering decisions in aggravated theft cases at the Medan District Court, with an emphasis on the balance between legal and non-legal aspects in realizing substantive justice. The issue of disparate sentencing that frequently arises is the main background of this study. The methods used are an integrated normative legal approach and an empirical legal approach. The normative approach is used to examine the provisions of Article 363 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the legal principles that govern the judge's considerations, while the empirical approach is carried out through direct observation of the trial process and analysis of the judge's decision. The results of the study indicate that the judge in case Number 1110/Pid. B/2025/PN Medan not only complied with legal aspects such as fulfilling the elements of the crime, evidence, and the application of the principle of legality, but also considered non-legal aspects such as the socio-economic conditions, age, and motives of the defendant. These considerations demonstrate the application of the principles of criminal individualization and proportional justice. In addition, the judge also considered moral values ​​and social benefits in his decision, which is in line with Gustav Radbruch's theory of three basic legal values: justice, legal certainty, and utility. This study concludes that the thinking patterns of judges at the Medan District Court reflect a shift toward substantive and restorative justice paradigms. It is recommended that the Supreme Court strengthen integrated sentencing guidelines to avoid disparities in sentencing and encourage the adoption of a rehabilitative approach for offenders with low economic motivations.
Co-Authors Dewi Pika Lbn Batu Fariz Aditya Florensia Silaban Mantasia Hasibuan Parlaungan Gabriel Siahaan Raja Songkup Pratama Siregar Samuel Sihite Seevaira Chyta Simanullang Vinolya Lidevia Br Manik