Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Qisthosia Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Nerisma Eka Putri
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Artificial Intelligence Berbasis Chatbot: Sarana Baru Panduan Hukum Keluarga Digital Falah, Bahrul; Nerisma Eka Putri
QISTHOSIA : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Majene

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46870/jhki.v4i2.765

Abstract

Chat GPT and Perplexity are two platforms of the many types of chat-based Artificial Intelligence (AI). Both platforms can pamper their users by presenting brief and clear information based on the questions given. The use of chat-based AI as a substitute for human legal assistance is a topic of conversation today. However, the validity of AI is often questioned. By looking at these problems, there needs to be a trial that can see the validity of Chat Gpt answers and any confusion regarding legal issues. The author is interested in measuring the level of validity of answers from the Chat GPT and Perplexity platforms in addressing family law problems. The author takes household problems caused by domestic violence. Then cases of domestic violence that occur will result in a lawsuit for divorce. Based on the questions asked, both platforms are very credible in providing basic information regarding divorce lawsuits, such as absolute competence and relatively appropriate courts to use to file lawsuits. However, both of them are not good at presenting detailed information regarding divorce lawsuits. This is natural, because both platforms are not specifically designed as family legal assistance chatbots. Therefore, a special platform is needed that is aimed at realizing these needs, by utilizing information delivery patterns from both platforms. An AI chatbot designed for these needs will certainly provide many benefits for society, one of which is guidance on filing cases independently. These benefits can also create a low cost court.
Problematika Hukuman Mati di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana dan Hak Asasi Manusia Ahmad Husairi; Devrian Ali Putra; Nerisma Eka Putri; Sarah Nur Izzati; Kurnia Saputri
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 4 JULI 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In this era of reform, the death penalty remains a highly controversial issue and a matter of serious concern, prompting various approaches from legal experts and practitioners. Decisions to execute the death penalty for certain criminals are influenced by social initiatives and law enforcement efforts aimed at enhancing social welfare. Regarding the death penalty, there is a stigma that generates both pro and con opinions, related to the concept and realization of human rights. Therefore, researchers are interested in delving deeper into the issue of the death penalty in Indonesia from the perspectives of criminal law and human rights.In this study, researchers employ a normative juridical method, focusing on specific subjects for analysis, namely conducting regulations-based analysis using library research. The theory of punishment is used as a theoretical framework, leading to findings that the death penalty fundamentally entails depriving someone of their right to life and causing physical suffering, which contradicts Article 6(1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as well as the shift from classical criminal justice systems focused on retributive justice to modern criminal justice systems oriented towards collective, restorative, and rehabilitative justice. The existence of the death penalty is considered a violation of an individual's right to life, as this right is deemed a gift that must be respected. Article 1 of Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights, which acknowledges the rights of every individual in their entirety, affirms that human rights exist in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Ahmad Husairi Devrian Ali Putra Falah, Bahrul Kurnia Saputri Sarah Nur Izzati