Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Kontribusi Dan Peran Polisi Militer Dalam Menegakkan Hukum Dan Keadilan Dalam Lingkungan Tentara Nasional Indonesia Debby Nauli Rafeyfa Simanjuntak; Alifio Kadafi; Bagas Jeremia Siahaan; Divany Harbina Emzilena Kaban; Faiz Aryaputra; Nadira Fariza Sukma; Putri Galuh Pitaloka; Sinta Ramadhani; Thalia Salma Putri Kamilah
Jurnal Relasi Publik Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Agustus : Jurnal Relasi Publik
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jrp-widyakarya.v2i3.3580

Abstract

As a sovereign and independent country, Indonesia has national goals it aspires to achieve, one of which is to maintain and promote world order. This can be implemented on a smaller scale, such as within the Indonesian National Armed Forces. This research is normative in nature, gathering data through literature studies. The results indicate that military police play a role within the Indonesian National Armed Forces. However, there are still many challenges faced by the military police in enforcing law and justice within the Indonesian National Armed Forces.
Prinsip Non-Intervensi di Era Krisis Kemanusiaan: Reinterpretasi Normatif dalam Tindakan Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Edward Benedictus Roring; Thalia Salma Putri Kamilah; Akmal Zaki; Faiz Aryaputra; Livia Haris; Salman Alfarisi; Diani Sadiawati
Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Agustus : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mutiara.v3i4.2683

Abstract

The principle of non-intervention is the main foundation in international relations that affirms the prohibition of interference by other countries in the domestic affairs of a country. However, increasingly complex global dynamics, especially related to the increasing humanitarian crises such as genocide, ethnic cleansing, and systematic human rights violations have raised serious challenges to the absolutism of the principle. This article aims to analyze how the principle of non-intervention is normatively reinterpreted in the practices and actions of the United Nations (UN), especially through the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine. Using a juridical-normative approach and case studies of interventions in Rwanda, Kosovo, and Syria, this study reveals a shift in the meaning of non-intervention from an absolute prohibition to a limited allowance for humanitarian protection. This finding confirms that in conditions of extreme humanitarian crises, the legitimacy of international action is not only measured by state sovereignty, but also by the moral and international legal obligations to protect civilians. The UN, as a multilateral actor, plays a key role in balancing the principle of non-intervention with humanitarian imperatives, thus giving rise to dynamic and contextual normative reinterpretations.