Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.285
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mutiara: Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Ardhi: Jurnal Pengabdian dalam Negri Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Kolaborasi: Jurnal Hasil Kegiatan Kolaborasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Pemuliaan Keadilan Perspektif Administrasi Publik dan hukum Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Edward Benedictus Roring
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

 1 
Sosialisasi Peraturan Pemerintah no 71 Tahun 2000 Dalam Mewujudkan Jiwa Sadar Hukum dan Sikap Anti Korupsi Kepada Siswa dan Siswi Kelas XI SMAN 34 Jakarta Edward Benedictus Roring; Hannatrie Syalsabillah; Amanda Mutiara Natasya; Fadia Fatimatuzzahra; Subakdi Subakdi
ARDHI : Jurnal Pengabdian Dalam Negri Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): ARDHI : Jurnal Pengabdian Dalam Negri
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Pendidikan Agama dan Filsafat Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/ardhi.v2i3.420

Abstract

The urgency in several cases of student delinquency stems from law breaking attitudes and corruption cases which are increasingly common in our country, Indonesia. This occurs due to the dysfunction of several law enforcement agencies which are considered not to have emphasized their function in educating and anticipating cases of law violations in society. Some basic examples of legal awareness education and anti-corruption attitudes carried out in schools are students practicing through the honesty canteen, students practicing remembering their own assignments/exercises, students practicing identifying honest characters, schools providing special extracurriculars. So that way students and teachers understand the benefits of honesty and discipline. However, it should be noted that legal awareness education and an anti-corruption attitude should not be provided at elementary school level alone, this education must continue at subsequent educational levels because at the same time educational institutions at the upper level can be a strong milestone and reminder for building accountability and transparency.
Pembentukan Peradilan Agraria sebagai Instrumen Hukum Administrasi Negara dalam Penyelesaian Konflik HGU Perkebunan Edward Benedictus Roring; Zul Amirul Haq; Salman Alfarisi
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i2.1733

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the sociological conditions of the HGU conflict, and to analyze the need for the establishment of an Agrarian Court from a legal and social aspect. The method used in this study is the Sociolegal method, which combines law with social reality. Primary data was taken from interviews with farmers, residents affected by HGU, BPN officials, Secondary data was obtained from laws and regulations, court decisions, NGO reports, land documents. Mesuji Regency is an area in Lampung Province which is known as one of the chronic agrarian conflict areas in Indonesia, especially those involving the Right to Cultivate (HGU) by large plantation companies including PT Barat Selatan Makmur Investindo (BSMI) and PT Silva Inhutani. This conflict involves local communities and companies holding HGU. The root of the problem is the community's claim to customary land, cultivated land, or inherited land. Allegations of HGU expansion that exceed the permit limit. The conclusion of this study is that the resolution process is often ineffective, unfair, and slow. HGU conflicts are generally structural in nature, because they involve inequality between local communities and large corporations that receive legal legitimacy through the granting of HGU. The establishment of an Agrarian Court has the potential to be a more just, effective, and contextual solution to resolving plantation HGU conflicts.
Dekonstruksi Marwah Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Krisis Legitimasi Tafsir Etika Konstitusional Edward Benedictus Roring
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni: Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v2i2.1707

Abstract

The democratic journey of the Indonesian nation has always experienced quite brilliant ups and downs and is not in accordance with the norms of good civility. By disobeying various things that always prioritize various principles of democracy and social life for society. The Constitutional Court (MK) as an institution that safeguards the constitution and protects the supremacy of law in Indonesia plays an important role in ensuring the sustainability of democratic principles and the protection of human rights. However, in recent years, the dignity of the Constitutional Court has often been questioned due to various controversies surrounding the integrity, independence and legitimacy of this institution. This article aims to analyze the causes and impacts of the collapse of the MK's dignity on legal governance and democratic stability in Indonesia. Using a normative-empirical approach, this article discusses the challenges faced by the Constitutional Court, including political interference, external pressure, and internal problems related to the code of ethics and professionalism of judges. This study found that the legitimacy crisis experienced by the Constitutional Court not only damaged the credibility of the institution but also threatened the stability of the law and constitutional order in Indonesia.
Tata Kelola dan Kebijakan Pengawasan Birokrasi Pemerintah Jawa Barat dalam Pelaksanaan Program Pembinaan Anak di Barak Militer Edward Benedictus Roring
Perspektif Administrasi Publik dan hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Juli: Perspektif Administrasi Publik dan hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/perspektif.v2i3.514

Abstract

This study analyzes the supervision carried out by the West Java Provincial Government on the implementation of the juvenile delinquency development program through military barracks initiated by Governor Kang Dedi Mulyadi (KDM). This program aims to form the character of discipline and responsibility of problematic children through a militaristic approach. The research method uses a juridical-normative approach and policy studies with analysis of official documents and interviews with relevant stakeholders. The results of the study indicate that provincial government supervision plays an important role in ensuring program implementation in accordance with the principles of child protection and character education standards. However, there are significant challenges related to the potential for violations of children's rights and the controversy over the harsh approach applied. This study recommends strengthening humanistic and participatory supervision mechanisms so that the development program can run effectively without ignoring children's rights. This study provides normative and practical contributions to the development of policies for the development of juvenile delinquency development in West Java that are oriented towards a balance between discipline and child protection.
Reformulasi Kebijakan SKCK sebagai Penjaminan Hak Non-Diskriminasi dan Akses Kerja Mantan Narapidana Edward Benedictus Roring
Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Juli : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/hukum.v2i4.513

Abstract

The Police Record Certificate (SKCK) policy as one of the requirements in the labor recruitment process often becomes an obstacle for former convicts to obtain employment. In fact, the right to work is part of human rights (HAM) that should be guaranteed for every individual, including those who have completed their sentence. This study analyzes the impact of the SKCK policy on employment opportunities for former convicts and how its elimination can be a progressive step in realizing human rights equality. This study uses a normative legal approach by examining related regulations, human rights principles, and comparative studies with other countries that have implemented inclusive policies for former convicts in the world of work. The results of the study show that the SKCK policy in job recruitment has the potential to discriminate against former convicts and strengthen social stigma, thus hindering their reintegration process into society. The elimination or at least reform of the SKCK policy to be more inclusive is expected to open up fairer access to employment, strengthen social rehabilitation, and reduce the rate of recidivism. Therefore, changes in regulations and policies are needed that better support the fulfillment of the rights of former convicts to obtain equal employment opportunities.
Urgensi Revisi UU TPKS: Hilangkan Subjektivitas Laki-Laki Sebagai Pelaku Dan Perempuan Sebagai Korban (Studi Kebijakan Publik Dan Psikologis Gender) Edward Benedictus Roring; Indira Jazmine; Selma Dwi Anaya Pebriyanti; Eleonora Gracia Puspa Setiawan; FX Adji Samekto
Pemuliaan Keadilan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): July : Pemuliaan Keadilan
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/pk.v2i3.1029

Abstract

Revision of the Law on Sexual Violence (UU TPKS) has become a strategic urgency in efforts to eliminate gender bias inherent in the current legal construction, especially related to the subjectivity of men as perpetrators and the objectivity of women as victims. The current TPKS Law, although it has provided an important legal basis for the protection of victims of sexual violence, still contains a gender paradigm that limits the understanding that perpetrators of sexual violence are only men and victims are only women, thus ignoring the complexity of social reality and the diversity of victims and perpetrators23. This approach not only reinforces patriarchal stereotypes, but also hinders fair and inclusive law enforcement. Therefore, the revision of the TPKS Law must be directed at eliminating rigid gender constructions, adopting a more neutral and inclusive perspective, and strengthening responsive legal protection for all victims without exception. This revision must also emphasize the role of the state in fulfilling victims' rights and integrating independent monitoring mechanisms to ensure effective and equitable implementation. Thus, the revision of the TPKS Law is not merely a normative update, but rather a transformation of the legal paradigm that prioritizes gender equality, respect for human rights, and substantive justice for the entire community
Prinsip Non-Intervensi di Era Krisis Kemanusiaan: Reinterpretasi Normatif dalam Tindakan Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Edward Benedictus Roring; Thalia Salma Putri Kamilah; Akmal Zaki; Faiz Aryaputra; Livia Haris; Salman Alfarisi; Diani Sadiawati
Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Agustus : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mutiara.v3i4.2683

Abstract

The principle of non-intervention is the main foundation in international relations that affirms the prohibition of interference by other countries in the domestic affairs of a country. However, increasingly complex global dynamics, especially related to the increasing humanitarian crises such as genocide, ethnic cleansing, and systematic human rights violations have raised serious challenges to the absolutism of the principle. This article aims to analyze how the principle of non-intervention is normatively reinterpreted in the practices and actions of the United Nations (UN), especially through the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine. Using a juridical-normative approach and case studies of interventions in Rwanda, Kosovo, and Syria, this study reveals a shift in the meaning of non-intervention from an absolute prohibition to a limited allowance for humanitarian protection. This finding confirms that in conditions of extreme humanitarian crises, the legitimacy of international action is not only measured by state sovereignty, but also by the moral and international legal obligations to protect civilians. The UN, as a multilateral actor, plays a key role in balancing the principle of non-intervention with humanitarian imperatives, thus giving rise to dynamic and contextual normative reinterpretations.
Fenomena Main Hakim Sendiri dan Dampaknya terhadap Keamanan yang Berujung Pidana: (Sosialisasi Pengabdian Masyarakat di Kelurahan Pangkalan Jati) Handoyo Prasetyo; Bambang Waluyo; Subakdi Subakdi; Edward Benedictus Roring
Kolaborasi : Jurnal Hasil Kegiatan Kolaborasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): September : Kolaborasi : Jurnal Hasil Kegiatan Kolaborasi Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Matematika dan Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/kolaborasi.v2i3.241

Abstract

The phenomenon of "vigilante" is still a serious problem in various regions, including Pangkalan Jati Village. This extrajudicial action not only violates social norms, but also has the potential to threaten public order and security. This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of "vigilante" in Pangkalan Jati Village, as well as its impact on environmental security. The method used is a case study with a qualitative approach through in-depth interviews with community leaders, village officials, and victims/perpetrators of "vigilante" actions. The results of the study indicate that factors such as weak law enforcement, public distrust of the authorities, and lack of legal awareness are the main triggers for these actions. The impacts include increasing rates of violence, social divisions, and security instability. As an effort to overcome this problem, legal socialization has been carried out to the community as part of community service activities. This socialization is expected to increase public legal awareness, strengthen trust in the authorities, and encourage the community to resolve problems legally. This study concludes that legal socialization is an important step in preventing "vigilante" actions and creating a safe and conducive environment.
Co-Authors Akmal Zaki Amanda Mutiara Natasya Bambang Waluyo Diani Sadiawati Eleonora Gracia Puspa Setiawan Fadia Fatimatuzzahra Faiz Aryaputra FX Adji Samekto Handoyo Prasetyo Hannatrie Syalsabillah Indira Jazmine Livia Haris Salman Alfarisi Selma Dwi Anaya Pebriyanti Subakdi Thalia Salma Putri Kamilah Zul Amirul Haq