Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities
Wathan, Bilqis Alifia
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris Saly, Jeane neltje; Retaly, Andrea Tamaranova; Shindy, Felicia; Wathan, Bilqis Alifia; Nathanael, Daven; Widjaja, Jason Marcellino
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 9 No 20 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8416104

Abstract

The Code of Ethics is crucial in the Notary profession. The Code of Ethics functions as a moral principle and reference for Notaries to carry out their interests. The Notary Code of Ethics exists in various sources. From these sources it can be seen the obligations and also things that are prohibited. Notaries are required to follow the existing Code of Ethics and if a violation occurs, certain steps can be followed up to impose sanctions as a form of notary accountability. The research uses normative methods with primary materials, namely laws and secondary materials, namely legal journals and information from the internet. Research is expected to be a means of education and affirmation regarding the Notary Code of Ethics itself.
Analisa Hukum Kebiasaan dalam Kasus Militer dan Paramiliter Nikaragua V. Amerika Serikat Wathan, Bilqis Alifia; Putri, Inayah Fasawwa
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i3.10389

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini ialah menganalisis Hukum Kebiasaan dalam Kasus Militer dan Paramiliter Nikaragua V. Amerika Serikat. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif. Dalam penelitian ini, kajian dilakukan terhadap taraf sinkronisasi vertikal yaitu meneliti keserasian hukum positif agar tidak bertentangan berdasarkan hierarki perundang-undangan (stufenbau theory). Sifat penelitian ini adalah preskriptif. Data dalam penelitian ini ialah data sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini ialah bahwa Kasus Nikaragua vs Amerika Serikat yang terjadi pada tahun 1986. Awalnya, Nikaragua mengajukan gugatan ke International Court of Justice (ICJ) pada tahun 1984, menuduh Amerika Serikat melakukan campur tangan militer dan paramiliter di wilayah mereka, yang melanggar hukum internasional. ICJ mendukung Nikaragua, menyatakan bahwa Amerika Serikat melanggar prinsip-prinsip hukum kebiasaan internasional yaitu prinsip non-intervensi, prinsip untuk tidak menggunakan kekerasan terhadap Negara lain, prinsip kedaulatan negara, dan prinsip tidak mengganggu perdagangan maritim yang damai. Tindakan-tindakan seperti penambangan pelabuhan Nikaragua, penempatan ranjau di perairan pedalaman mereka, dan intervensi dalam konflik dengan El Salvador menjadi bukti bagi pelanggaran tersebut. Dalam keputusan Mahkamah Internasional, memerintahkan Amerika Serikat untuk membayar kompensasi dan reparasi kepada Nikaragua. Kasus ini menegaskan pentingnya hukum kebiasaan internasional dalam memastikan kedaulatan negara dan mempromosikan hubungan internasional yang stabil dan damai, meskipun sebagian besar hukum telah digantikan oleh perjanjian-perjanjian yang lebih baru.
Comparative Study of Carbon Tax Regulations in Indonesia and Singapore Wathan, Bilqis Alifia; Lie, Gunardi
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): Oktober, Social Issues and Problems in Society
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.50321

Abstract

Climate change has become a global issue that urges countries to take concrete steps to reduce carbon emissions. Carbon tax is seen as a strategic fiscal instrument to achieve low-emission development. This study aims to compare the legal frameworks and carbon tax policies in Singapore and Indonesia, while assessing their implementation within the context of fiscal justice and environmental law. This research use normative juridical comparative approach, which analyze laws and regulations. The study findings indicate that Singapore implements a fixed rate carbon tax based on emission threshold alongside mandatory emissions reporting. Whilst Indonesia has only just begun implementing carbon tax with a minimum rate that is deemed too low as well as the lack of adequate technical regulations. Substantively, Indonesia still faces obstacles in determining the allocation of revenue from the carbon tax and ensuring the effectiveness of tax rates to influence economic behavior. This study concludes to emphasize the need for reformulation of carbon tax policy in Indonesia by adopting the polluter pays principle, implementing a mandatory emissions reporting system, and strengthening derivative regulations to be more adaptive and responsive to the challenges of climate change. Singapore's experience can serve as an important reference in designing a fairer and more effective carbon tax policy in Indonesia
Co-Authors Jeane Neltje Saly Lie, Gunardi Nathanael, Daven Putri, Inayah Fasawwa Retaly, Andrea Tamaranova Shindy, Felicia Widjaja, Jason Marcellino