Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.554
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Islamic Insights Journal Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Jurnal Studi Agama Islam Transformatif : Journal of Islamic Studies Al Irfani: Journal of Al Qur'anic and Tafsir Al'Adalah El-Wasathy: Journal of Islamic Studies De Facto: Journal of international multidisciplinary sciences
Sani, Azwar
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

 1 
Kritik Terhadap Penggunaan Metode Penafsiran Literal dalam Tafsir Al-Qur’an Sani, Azwar
Al-Irfani: Journal of Al Qur'anic and Tafsir Vol 5 No 1 (2024): Al Irfani: Journal of Al Qur'anic and Tafsir
Publisher : STAI Darul Kamal NW Kembang Kerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51700/irfani.v5i1.606

Abstract

This research aims to criticize the use of literal interpretation methods in the interpretation of the Quran and offer contextual interpretation as an alternative method of interpretation. The study analyzed the history of the use of literal interpretation methods in the interpretation of the Quran, the characteristics of literal interpretation methods, the weaknesses of literal interpretation methods, and the impacts of using literal interpretation methods. The method used in this study was qualitative with a literature study approach. Data was collected through a literature study of books, journals, and related articles. Then, data analysis was conducted using a qualitative descriptive analysis method. The results of the study show that the use of literal interpretation methods in the interpretation of the Quran still lacks attention to the historical and social context when writing verses, and produces a rigid and limited understanding of the Quranic text. The excessive use of literal interpretation methods can also lead to conflicts among Muslims. The impacts of using literal interpretation methods include producing a rigid understanding of religion, neglecting the development of times and the needs of Muslims, and not paying enough attention to social justice values in the Quran. As an alternative, contextual interpretation is offered as a method that pays more attention to the historical, social, and cultural context when writing verses in the Quran. In conclusion, this research shows that the use of literal interpretation methods in the interpretation of the Quran has many weaknesses and negative impacts, so it is necessary to consider using alternative methods such as contextual interpretation.
Comparative Study of the Concept of Prophethood in the Holy Quran and the Deuterocanonical Bible Kustiadi, Umar; Sani, Azwar; Wildan, Faiz
Jurnal Studi Agama Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Studi Agama
Publisher : Program Studi Studi Agama Agama Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Pemikiran Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/jsa.v8i1.21598

Abstract

Abstract The concept of prophethood is a complex topic to discuss, especially in terms of the role that prophets play and the messages that they bring from God. The Quran and the Deuterocanonical books offer different perspectives on this concept, with similarities and differences in their understanding of the role of prophets, their responsibilities, and the messages they convey. This qualitative-descriptive study examines the concept of prophethood in the Quran and Deuterocanonical books, focusing on the similarities and differences between the two. The study uses library research as a method to collect and analyze data from literature. The findings of the study indicate that both the Quran and Deuterocanonical books emphasize the importance of prophethood and the messages that prophets bring from God. However, there are differences in how the two texts understand the status and name of the prophet, as well as their role and tasks. The study concludes that a comparative approach to understanding the concept of prophethood can lead to a deeper and more nuanced appreciation of this important aspect of religious belief. It also emphasizes the importance of dialogue and mutual respect between different religious traditions
Pergeseran Metodologi Kesahihan Sanad Hadis dalam Pemikiran Syuhudi Ismail Sani, Azwar
El-Wasathy: Journal of Islamic Studies Vol 1 No 2 (2023): El-Wasathy: Journal of Islamic Studies
Publisher : Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat Asosiasi Masyarakat Madani Indonesia (AMMI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61693/elwasathy.vol12.2023.94-108

Abstract

Gagasan tentang metodologi kesahihan sanad hadis telah mengalami pergeseran signifikan sepanjang sejarah Islam. Pada awalnya, ulama hadis terutama menggunakan metode ilmu rijal untuk menilai kesahihan hadis dengan fokus pada derajat kepercayaan perawi dan faktor eksternal seperti silsilah perawi. Namun, seiring perkembangan zaman dan percampuran budaya, metode kesahihan sanad hadis juga mengalami perubahan. Syuhudi Ismail dalam bukunya "Kaidah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis" membahas perbedaan metode kesahihan sanad hadis antara ulama hadis klasik dan modern. Pergeseran ini mencerminkan pengaruh konteks sosial dan budaya di mana para ulama hidup. Pergeseran metode ini juga mencerminkan respons terhadap tantangan zaman, terutama dalam menghadapi hadis-hadis palsu atau yang dipalsukan. Ulama hadis modern lebih berfokus pada analisis matan hadis untuk memastikan bahwa hadis tersebut sesuai dengan ajaran Islam dan memiliki kualitas yang baik. Jenis penelitian ini pada dasarnya dapat dikategorikan ke dalam penelitian Kualitatif dalam pendekatan kepustakaan serta analisis literatur, karena objek penelitiannya adalah literatur-literatur yang membahas metode kesahihan sanad hadis. Kesimpulan artikel ini menunjukkan telah adanya pergeseran karakteristik metode kesahihan sanad hadis karena berkembangnya zaman, dan ini menjadikan bukti pula bahwa perangkat metode kesahihan sanad hadis tidak stagnan dan mampu diperbaharui dengan pendekatan-pendekatan yang relevan dengan kehidupan saat ini.
Kontroversi Penyembelihan Ismail-Ishak sebagai Kurban Abraham: Studi Komparatif Al-Qur'an dan Bibel Sani, Azwar; Yasa, Mumtaz Ibnu
Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin | Vol. 10 No. 1 June 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ushuluna.v10i1.37034

Abstract

Abstrak: Penyembelihan Ismail dan Ishak sebagai kurban Abraham menjadi topik yang kontroversial dalam agama Islam dan Kristen. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis komparatif untuk membandingkan pandangan kedua agama tentang kisah ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi perspektif yang berbeda dalam kedua agama dan untuk menganalisis kesamaan dan perbedaan antara pandangan agama Islam dan Kristen dalam menanggapi kontroversi ini. Penelitian ini akan mengarah pada tiga tujuan, yaitu mengkaji pandangan agama Islam tentang kisah penyembelihan Ismail, menguji pandangan agama Kristen mengenai penyembelihan Ishak, dan membandingkan keduanya serta menganalisis perbedaan dan kesamaannya. Penelitian ini berfokus pada perbedaan interpretasi antara Islam dan Kristen tentang putra yang disembelih dan tujuan dari perintah Allah kepada Ibrahim untuk menyembelih putranya. Penelitian ini menggunakan sumber informasi yang bermutu, termasuk ayat-ayat Al-Qur'an dan Al-Kitab dari para ulama agama Islam dan tokoh agama Kristen yang terkemuka. Melalui hasil penelitian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa meskipun terdapat perbedaan interpretasi antara Islam dan Kristen bahkan agama islam itu sendiri tentang penyembelihan putra Abraham, kedua agama ini sama-sama menghargai pentingnya pengorbanan Nabi Ibrahim dan kesetiaannya pada Allah. Hasil dari penelitian ini dapat memberikan kontribusi positif dalam mengatasi kontroversi yang terkait dengan kisah penyembelihan Ismail atau Ishak sebagai kurban Abraham dan memperkuat hubungan antar umat beragama. Kata Kunci: Al-Qur'an dan Bible, Kontroversi, Komparasi, Kurban Abraham, Penyembelihan Abstract: The dispute over the sacrifice of Ismail and Ishak as Abraham's (Ibrahim's) offering is a controversial topic in both Islam and Christianity. This study employs a comparative analysis method to compare the two religions' views on the story. The study aims to identify different perspectives in both religions and analyze the similarities and differences in their responses to the controversy. The research will focus on three objectives: first, to examine the Islamic perspective of the sacrifice of Ismail as Abraham's offering in the Quran; second, to test the Christian perspective of the sacrifice of Ishak as Abraham's offering in the Bible; third, to compare the two religions' perspectives and analyze the differences and similarities between the sacrifice of Ismail and Ishak as Abraham's offering in the Quran and Bible. The study focuses on the different interpretations between Islam and Christianity regarding the son who was sacrificed and the purpose of Allah's command to Abraham to sacrifice his son. The study uses credible sources of information, including verses from the Quran and Bible from renowned Islamic scholars and Christian religious leaders. The findings show that despite the different interpretations between Islam and Christianity, and even within Islam itself, regarding the sacrifice of Abraham's son, both religions value the significance of the sacrifice of Prophet Ibrahim and his devotion to Allah. The research results could make a positive contribution in addressing the controversy surrounding the sacrifice of Ismail or Ishak as Abraham's offering and strengthening interfaith relations. Keywords: Quran and Bible. Controversy, Comparison, Abraham's Sacrifice, Slaughter
Muhammad Syahrur's Intratectuality Method in the Concept of Faith and Islam Sani, Azwar
Islamic Insights Journal Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Islamic Insights Journal
Publisher : Pusat Studi Pesantren dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, LPPM, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.iij.2022.004.02.1

Abstract

This article discusses the intratextual interpretation method of the concepts of faith and Islam by Muhammad Syahrur, a prominent Muslim thinker. The focus of the study is to explore Syahrur's approach to Islamic theology and how he uses intratextual interpretation as a method to interpret texts and underlying meanings. This study employs a qualitative critical analysis method by examining Syahrur's texts to identify themes and patterns related to his intratextual interpretation of faith and Islam. The findings reveal that Syahrur's interpretation of faith and Islam is based on the Quran, which he believes to be the primary source for Islamic theology. Syahrur uses intratextual interpretation to identify the underlying meanings of Quranic verses, including linguistic nuances and historical context. This study also shows that Syahrur's intratextual interpretation of faith and Islam significantly differs from traditional understandings of these concepts. For instance, Syahrur reinterprets the concept of faith to emphasize the importance of rationality and reason, which he believes are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of Islamic theology. Overall, this study provides an innovative perspective for understanding intratextual interpretation of faith and Islam. Its findings contribute to a more comprehensive appreciation of the philosophical and theological principles of modern Islamic thought. Keywords: Quranic interpretation, Muhammad Syahrur, Linguistic Approach, Intratextuality. Abstrak Artikel ini membahas metode interpretasi intratektualitas konsep iman dan Islam oleh Muhammad Syahrur, seorang pemikir muslim terkemuka. Fokus dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengeksplorasi pendekatan Syahrur terhadap teologi Islam dan bagaimana ia menggunakan interpretasi intratektualitas sebagai metode untuk menginterpretasikan teks-teks dan makna-makna yang mendasarinya. Studi ini menggunakan metode kualitatif analisis kritis dengan memeriksa teks-teks Syahrur untuk mengidentifikasi tema-tema dan pola-pola terkait dengan interpretasi intratektualitasnya tentang iman dan Islam. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa interpretasi Syahrur tentang iman dan Islam didasarkan pada teks Al-Qur’an yang ia percayai sebagai sumber primer bagi teologi Islam. Syahrur menggunakan interpretasi intratektualitas untuk mengidentifikasi makna-makna yang mendasar dari ayat-ayat Al-Qur’an, termasuk nuansa-nuansa linguistik dan konteks sejarah. Studi ini juga menunjukkan bahwa interpretasi intratektualitas Syahrur tentang iman dan Islam secara signifikan berbeda dari pemahaman tradisional tentang konsep-konsep tersebut. Sebagai contoh, Syahrur menafsirkan kembali konsep iman untuk menekankan pentingnya rasionalitas dan akal, yang menurutnya penting untuk memahami secara komprehensif teologi Islam. Secara keseluruhan, studi ini memberikan perspektif inovatif untuk memahami interpretasi intratektualitas dari iman dan Islam. Temuannya berkontribusi pada penghargaan yang lebih komprehensif tentang prinsip-prinsip filosofis dan teologis pemikiran Islam modern. Kata kunci: Penafsiran Al-Qur’an, Muhammad Syahrur, Pendekatan Linguistik, Intratekstualitas.
TAFSIR DAN SAINS: STUDI ATAS KOMPATIBILITAS DAN KONTRADIKSI ANTARATAFSIR AL-QUR'AN DAN ILMU SAINS MODERN Sodikin, Sodikin; Sani, Azwar
DE FACTO : Journal Of International Multidisciplinary Science Vol 3 No 02 (2025): DE FACTO : Journal Of International Multidisciplinary Science
Publisher : Pusat Studi Ekonomi, Publikasi Ilmiah dan Pengembangan SDM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62668/defacto.v3i02.1698

Abstract

This research investigates the relationship between the interpretation of the Qur'an and modern science in the era of globalization, evaluating their compatibility and potential contradictions. Utilizing content analysis and literature review, this research aims to uncover how both fields view natural phenomena, identifying similarities and differences in their interpretations. More than just highlighting existing differences, such as in the debate on the theory of evolution, this research seeks to find potential synergy between the spiritual views in the Qur'an and modern scientific findings. The results of the study are expected to provide deeper insights into each discipline's perspectives on the universe and to promote dialogue between the two fields often considered as conflicting. The ultimate aim is to enrich critical thinking and contributions to science, as well as provide a reference for further research on the interaction between the interpretation of the Qur'an and science. It aims to facilitate a more integrative and holistic understanding, encouraging collaboration between religion and science for a broader understanding of the world.
PERGESERAN MAKNA LITERASI KITAB KUNING: IMPLIKASI TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN LITERASI DALAM TRADISI PEMBELAJARAN ISLAM Sani, Azwar
Al'Adalah Vol. 28 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/aladalah.v28i1.397

Abstract

Islamic boarding schools or pesantren, integral to traditional Islamic education in Indonesia, presently confront a pivotal moment due to the rapid advancement of technology and digital transformation. While previous studies have emphasized enhancements in institutional and curricular frameworks, there has been inadequate attention to how these modifications fundamentally transform the notion of kitab kuning literacy. This study examines the improvement of kitab kuning literacy through an extensive literature analysis that integrates many research aspects of pesantren modernism, digital pedagogy, and critical literacy. A methodical examination of academic literature was performed utilizing major databases, concentrating on publications from the previous decade and foundational texts. The results indicate that the improvement of kitab kuning literacy involves not only technical integration but also a profound transformation of the pesantren environment. Contemporary literacy encompasses three interconnected components: traditional literacy, which preserves academic heritage (sanad); adaptive digital literacy, which utilizes technological tools for accessibility and hybridity; and critical literacy, which empowers students to assess and validate information in the post-truth era. This study provides a comprehensive framework that elucidates the epistemic progression of kitab kuning literacy and delineates practical consequences for policymakers and educators in curriculum development, teacher training, and the continuous improvement of Islamic education.
Kontroversi Penyembelihan Ismail-Ishak sebagai Kurban Abraham: Studi Komparatif Al-Qur'an dan Bibel Sani, Azwar; Yasa, Mumtaz Ibnu
Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin | Vol. 10 No. 1 June 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ushuluna.v10i1.37034

Abstract

Abstrak: Penyembelihan Ismail dan Ishak sebagai kurban Abraham menjadi topik yang kontroversial dalam agama Islam dan Kristen. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis komparatif untuk membandingkan pandangan kedua agama tentang kisah ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi perspektif yang berbeda dalam kedua agama dan untuk menganalisis kesamaan dan perbedaan antara pandangan agama Islam dan Kristen dalam menanggapi kontroversi ini. Penelitian ini akan mengarah pada tiga tujuan, yaitu mengkaji pandangan agama Islam tentang kisah penyembelihan Ismail, menguji pandangan agama Kristen mengenai penyembelihan Ishak, dan membandingkan keduanya serta menganalisis perbedaan dan kesamaannya. Penelitian ini berfokus pada perbedaan interpretasi antara Islam dan Kristen tentang putra yang disembelih dan tujuan dari perintah Allah kepada Ibrahim untuk menyembelih putranya. Penelitian ini menggunakan sumber informasi yang bermutu, termasuk ayat-ayat Al-Qur'an dan Al-Kitab dari para ulama agama Islam dan tokoh agama Kristen yang terkemuka. Melalui hasil penelitian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa meskipun terdapat perbedaan interpretasi antara Islam dan Kristen bahkan agama islam itu sendiri tentang penyembelihan putra Abraham, kedua agama ini sama-sama menghargai pentingnya pengorbanan Nabi Ibrahim dan kesetiaannya pada Allah. Hasil dari penelitian ini dapat memberikan kontribusi positif dalam mengatasi kontroversi yang terkait dengan kisah penyembelihan Ismail atau Ishak sebagai kurban Abraham dan memperkuat hubungan antar umat beragama. Kata Kunci: Al-Qur'an dan Bible, Kontroversi, Komparasi, Kurban Abraham, Penyembelihan Abstract: The dispute over the sacrifice of Ismail and Ishak as Abraham's (Ibrahim's) offering is a controversial topic in both Islam and Christianity. This study employs a comparative analysis method to compare the two religions' views on the story. The study aims to identify different perspectives in both religions and analyze the similarities and differences in their responses to the controversy. The research will focus on three objectives: first, to examine the Islamic perspective of the sacrifice of Ismail as Abraham's offering in the Quran; second, to test the Christian perspective of the sacrifice of Ishak as Abraham's offering in the Bible; third, to compare the two religions' perspectives and analyze the differences and similarities between the sacrifice of Ismail and Ishak as Abraham's offering in the Quran and Bible. The study focuses on the different interpretations between Islam and Christianity regarding the son who was sacrificed and the purpose of Allah's command to Abraham to sacrifice his son. The study uses credible sources of information, including verses from the Quran and Bible from renowned Islamic scholars and Christian religious leaders. The findings show that despite the different interpretations between Islam and Christianity, and even within Islam itself, regarding the sacrifice of Abraham's son, both religions value the significance of the sacrifice of Prophet Ibrahim and his devotion to Allah. The research results could make a positive contribution in addressing the controversy surrounding the sacrifice of Ismail or Ishak as Abraham's offering and strengthening interfaith relations. Keywords: Quran and Bible. Controversy, Comparison, Abraham's Sacrifice, Slaughter
The Implementation of Schleiermacher's Hermeneutics in The Interpretation of The Qur'an Jufri Hasani Z; Sani, Azwar
Islam Transformatif : Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): January-June 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/it.v9i1.9452

Abstract

This study aims to find out the use of hermeneutics in the interpretation of the Qur'an and consider how it can help in understanding and deepening the message contained in the Qur'an. This study used a qualitative approach with an evaluative analysis of Schleiermacher's work, 'Hermeneutics and Criticism.' This study offered a new contribution by systematically applying two main approaches, namely grammatical and psychological hermeneutics, in the context of the interpretation of the Qur'an. This research also integrated classical and contemporary interpretations to test the extent to which the power of hermeneutics could be used in understanding Islamic sacred texts. The results of the study showed that Schleiermacher's hermeneutic approach is able to make a significant contribution to broadening readers' understanding of the Qur'anic text comprehensively. Thus, the application of Schleiermacher's hermeneutics in the interpretation of the Qur'an has the potential to bridge the gap between the authority of the text and the modern experience of the reader, as well as open up opportunities for the development of an integrative and contextual interpretive framework. Therefore, this research is important as an exploratory effort in developing a deeper understanding of Islamic scriptures through the lens of philosophical hermeneutics.
Co-Authors Jufri Hasani Z Kustiadi, Umar Sodikin Sodikin Wildan, Faiz Yasa, Mumtaz Ibnu