Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Mudarrisuna: Media Kajian Pendidikan Agama Islam Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia Jurnal Pendidikan Islam
Satria, Rama
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Tantangan Madrasah Di Era Digital: Transformasi Pendidikan Agama Islam Dalam Konteks Teknologi Sari, Juwita Puspita; Setio, Juli; Satria, Rama; Oviyanti, Fitri; Maryamah, Maryamah
Jurnal Mudarrisuna: Media Kajian Pendidikan Agama Islam Vol 14, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jm.v14i2.23489

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tantangan yang dialami madrasah di era digital dan strategi untuk mengatasi tantangan tersebut sehingga madrasah mampu mempertahankan eksistensinya di dunia pendidikan hingga saat ini. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik observasi dan wawancara. Selanjutnya dilakukan penganalisisan data menggunakan teknik reduksi data, penyajian data dan penarikan kesimpulan. Berdasarkan temuan penelitian, tantangan yang dihadapi oleh MTs Ahliyah 1 di era digital adalah keterbatasan akses teknologi, dan persaingan yang semakin ketat dalam mempertahankan eksistensinya dan untuk mempertahankan jumlah siswa di era digital. Adapun strategi yang dilakukan untuk mengatasi tantangan tersebut adalah dengan meningkatkan akses teknologi, memberikan pelatihan yang intensif dan bekelanjutan dalam penggunaan teknologi dan menerapkannya dengan efektif dalam proses pembelajaran, mempertahankan program keunggulan madrasah sebagai ciri khas madrasah tersebut, dan membangun branding yang kuat dan melakukan pemasaran yang efektif untuk menarik minat siswa dan keluarga mereka. Dengan begitu, ketika madrasah memanfaatkan teknologi dengan bijak dan menggunakan strategi yang tepat, maka madrasah dapat terus beradaptasi dengan perubahan zaman dan mempertahankan eksistensinya sebagai lembaga pendidikan.
ANALISIS KOMPARASI FILSAFAT ILMU DAN ILMU FILSAFAT SERTA IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP PENDIDIKAN MODERN S., Sumarni; Sartika; Satria, Rama; Ibrahim, Duski; Syarnubi
Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Vol 13 No 2 (2023): November
Publisher : Research Departement of Darullughah Wadda'wah International Islamic University Bangil, Pasuruan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38073/jpi.v13i2.1327

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine the comparison or difference between philosophy of science and philosophy of science and its implications for the development of education today. The method used in this research is library research. This research data collection used primary and secondary data sources. In analyzing the data, the author uses analytical descriptive data analysis techniques. Namely, data related to the theme being researched is collected and classified, then described and finally concluded. The result of this research is that philosophy can stand in the middle of the branches of science as a controller and director for its implementation. The following are several philosophical schools that have greatly contributed to the development of education today, namely progressivism (the implications are linked to the curriculum, so the curriculum must be open, adapted to local needs and centered on experience); essentialism (the implication is that the learning process needs to pay attention to the psychology and skills of students), and reconstructionism (the implication is that schools must direct change (the reconstruction of the current social order. As technology progresses over time, education must keep pace with this progress)
The Dismissal of Constitutional Court Judges by the House of Representatives from the Perspective of Separation of Powers Satria, Rama
Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): December (In Press)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jmi.v4i2.1869

Abstract

Abstract: The power of the House of Representatives to remove constitutional judges is discussed and analyzed in this article. It examines how the House of Representatives carries out its oversight role and if that includes assessing constitutional judges. The House of Representatives' dismissal of constitutional judges is also demonstrated by actual examples in this article. Purpose: From the perspective of the separation of powers, this research aims to investigate and evaluate the House of Representatives' action in dismissing constitutional judges. Design/Methodology/Approach: A legislative, conceptual, and case approach using a legal research technique is employed in this analysis. Primary and secondary legal resources constitute the legal materials utilized. Findings: The findings of this investigation demonstrate that the DPR lacks the authority to fire Constitutional Court judges, regardless of whether it be via an evaluation or via any other method. Constitutional Court judges, who are chosen and appointed by the President, must continue in their role until their term expires, unless they are no longer qualified as per the Law on the Constitutional Court. The model of DPR supervision of Constitutional Court Judges, as described in Article 228A of DPR Regulation No. 1 of 2025, is unconstitutional. The oversight model violates the 1945 Indonesian Republic Constitution, the Constitutional Court Law, Constitutional Court Decision 103/PUU-XX/2022, the separation of powers, the lawmaking, independence, and authority principles. Originality/value: This research is highly original and innovative. This is because the author explores the issue from the perspective of separation of powers. The findings of this article contribute to the implementation of constitutional judges' independence.
Co-Authors Amilda Amilda Duski Ibrahim, Duski Fitri Oviyanti Kasinyo Harto Marsudin, Ahmad Rizaldi Maryamah Maryamah S., Sumarni Sari, Juwita Puspita Sartika Setio, Juli Shania, Shania Syarnubi