Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Enterprise and Development (JED) Sinergi International Journal of Communication Sciences Politeia : Journal of Public Administration and Political Science and International Relations
Irwani
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Influence of Public Policy on Business Strategy: A Systematic Literature Review and Thematic Visualization Analysis Junaedi, Ahyar; Rafii, Mohamad; Irwani
Journal of Enterprise and Development (JED) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Enterprise and Development (JED)
Publisher : Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business of Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/jed.v6i2.11104

Abstract

Purpose — The primary purpose of this study is to investigate how political decisions and public policies shape the formulation and implementation of business strategies across various organizational contexts.Method — Following the PRISMA guidelines, this study commenced with an extensive search in the Scopus database, initially identifying 281 articles. However, after rigorous relevance and quality screenings, only six articles were selected. VOSviewer was then employed for advanced visual analytics to explore the interconnections and thematic developments within the academic discourse, providing deeper insights into the literature's structure and evolution.Result — The findings reveal a complex interplay between business strategies and public policies, where alignment with governmental directives is associated with increased innovation and market adaptability. Conversely, misalignments tend to result in higher compliance costs and reduced strategic agility. The visualizations highlight key areas such as sustainability, regulatory frameworks, and strategic management, underscoring their crucial roles in shaping how businesses respond to policy changes.Novelty — This Systematic Literature Review (SLR) combines thematic visualizations with systematic data analysis to provide a clearer understanding of the dynamic relationship between policy decisions and business strategies. This approach not only reveals the current state of research but also traces the evolution of key themes over time, offering insights into the shifting focuses of both academic and practical perspectives.
Digital Exclusion and Social Inequity: A Global Narrative Review of Access to Education, Healthcare, and the Digital Economy Saleh, Munandi; Irwani; Bahrianoor
Sinergi International Journal of Communication Sciences Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): November 2024
Publisher : Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijcs.v2i4.680

Abstract

Digital inequality is a growing concern that contributes significantly to socioeconomic disparities in education, healthcare, and economic participation. This narrative review aims to explore the structural and systemic dimensions of digital inequality and its implications for marginalized communities. Literature was sourced from databases including Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar using a combination of targeted keywords and Boolean search techniques. Articles were selected based on relevance, methodological diversity, and contextual alignment. The review identifies critical themes, including the impact of unequal digital access on educational attainment, disparities in telehealth usage, and limited economic opportunities in digitally excluded populations. Findings reveal that regions with weak digital infrastructure and low digital literacy consistently report lower educational performance, reduced health engagement, and limited employment prospects. Public policy, infrastructure investment, and digital training emerge as decisive factors that either mitigate or exacerbate these challenges. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of equitable digital policy design, community-based interventions, and collaborative global strategies to ensure inclusive digital development. Despite growing research on digital inequality, gaps remain in longitudinal analysis and intersectional perspectives. This review recommends future studies to adopt multidimensional frameworks to better inform policy and practice. In conclusion, addressing digital inequality is not only a technological necessity but also a social imperative. Bridging the divide is essential for creating a more just, inclusive, and resilient society in the digital era.
Influence of Public Policy on Business Strategy: A Systematic Literature Review and Thematic Visualization Analysis Junaedi, Ahyar; Rafii, Mohamad; Irwani
Journal of Enterprise and Development (JED) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Enterprise and Development (JED)
Publisher : Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business of Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/jed.v6i2.11104

Abstract

Purpose — The primary purpose of this study is to investigate how political decisions and public policies shape the formulation and implementation of business strategies across various organizational contexts.Method — Following the PRISMA guidelines, this study commenced with an extensive search in the Scopus database, initially identifying 281 articles. However, after rigorous relevance and quality screenings, only six articles were selected. VOSviewer was then employed for advanced visual analytics to explore the interconnections and thematic developments within the academic discourse, providing deeper insights into the literature's structure and evolution.Result — The findings reveal a complex interplay between business strategies and public policies, where alignment with governmental directives is associated with increased innovation and market adaptability. Conversely, misalignments tend to result in higher compliance costs and reduced strategic agility. The visualizations highlight key areas such as sustainability, regulatory frameworks, and strategic management, underscoring their crucial roles in shaping how businesses respond to policy changes.Novelty — This Systematic Literature Review (SLR) combines thematic visualizations with systematic data analysis to provide a clearer understanding of the dynamic relationship between policy decisions and business strategies. This approach not only reveals the current state of research but also traces the evolution of key themes over time, offering insights into the shifting focuses of both academic and practical perspectives.
Fiscal, Political, and Developmental Dimensions of Decentralization: Global Insights Irwani
Politeia : Journal of Public Administration and Political Science and International Relations Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): January 2025
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/politeia.v3i1.961

Abstract

Decentralization and regional autonomy have become central themes in governance reforms worldwide, raising critical questions about their effectiveness in improving accountability, service delivery, and socio-economic outcomes. This narrative review synthesizes existing scholarship to evaluate the effectiveness of decentralization across fiscal, political, administrative, and developmental dimensions. Literature was collected from databases such as Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, using targeted keywords and applying inclusion criteria focused on relevance, methodological rigor, and empirical evidence. The review highlights three main findings. First, fiscal decentralization demonstrates potential to enhance accountability and service delivery, but its success is constrained by elite capture and dependence on central transfers. Second, political and administrative autonomy fosters policy innovation and conflict resolution when embedded in strong institutional and legal frameworks, but in weaker contexts it may aggravate corruption and inefficiency. Third, socio-economic outcomes show significant variation: while OECD and some Asian regions report improvements in education, health, and infrastructure, many African and fragile states experience uneven benefits. These findings underscore that decentralization is not a uniform process; instead, its outcomes are shaped by systemic factors such as institutional design, political culture, and legal guarantees. Effective policy interventions should strengthen local capacity, promote transparency, and establish balanced fiscal frameworks. Future research should expand to underrepresented regions and adopt longitudinal approaches to capture long-term impacts, ensuring decentralization reforms achieve sustainable governance and inclusive development.
Co-Authors Bahrianoor Junaedi, Ahyar Rafii, Mohamad Saleh, Munandi