Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.006
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Jambe Law Journal Kosmik Hukum Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Lex Scientia Law Review Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev)
Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
The Business Law in Contemporary Times: A Comparison of Indonesia, Vietnam, and Ghana Kurniawan, I Gede Agus; Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Thuong , Mac Thi Hoai; Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo
Susbtantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 7 No 2 (2024): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/substantivejustice.v7i2.297

Abstract

This study examines the intersection of justice within the framework of business law by analyzing its effectiveness and implementation in Indonesia, Vietnam, and Ghana three nations navigating the challenges of globalization. Justice is conceptualized through the lens of fairness, efficiency, and inclusivity in legal frameworks. By adopting a comparative normative legal research method, this study identifies the critical factors influencing business law implementation: regulatory quality, institutional capacity, political stability, and technological infrastructure. Findings reveal disparities in achieving justice due to corruption, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and weak enforcement mechanisms. While Indonesia grapples with regulatory overlap and decentralized governance challenges, Vietnam demonstrates progressive reforms but struggles with legal clarity. Ghana, despite leveraging political stability, faces significant limitations in infrastructure and enforcement. The study highlights the need for enhanced legal certainty, equitable stakeholder protections, and institutional reforms to align domestic business laws with global standards. Addressing these disparities can foster a more just and competitive business environment, ensuring fair treatment for all economic actors.
Intellectual Property Rights and Ethics: A Comparison of Philosophical Approaches in Northern and Southern Countries Kurniawan, I Gede Agus; Samsithawrati, Putu Aras; Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo; Thuong, Mac Thi Hoai
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 25 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v25i1.24489

Abstract

The philosophical differences between Northern countries, which adopt utilitarian and libertarian perspectives emphasizing strict Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) protection, and Southern countries, which prioritize distributive justice and universal access, create tensions in implementing global IPR policies, particularly concerning important issues such as access to medicines and technology. This research aims to analyze the influence of philosophical approach differences between Northern and Southern countries on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) policies and implementation, as well as their ethical implications for public access to knowledge and technology. This research employs normative legal research methods with a conceptual approach, analyzing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials through literature study, and uses qualitative analysis to interpret the differences in philosophical approaches to IPR policies between Northern and Southern countries along with their ethical implications. The research findings show that philosophical differences between Northern countries, which adopt a utilitarian-libertarian approach with strict IPR protection, and Southern countries, which emphasize distributive justice-collectivism with a more flexible approach, have significant ethical implications for public access to knowledge and technology, as seen in the HIV/AIDS crisis in Africa and access to education, where strict patent policies of Northern countries often hinder developing countries' access to important technology and knowledge, while Southern countries advocate for universal access especially for basic needs such as health and education, creating tension between IPR protection and fulfillment of society's basic needs.
Utilitarianism Versus Communalism: A Legal Theory Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Ethics in Global North and South Kurniawan, I Gede Agus; Samsithawrati, Putu Aras; Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Budiana, I Nyoman; Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo
Jambe Law Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Jambi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/home.v8i1.450

Abstract

The development of the idea of ​​intellectual property has become a separate debate related to countries in the Global South and countries in the Global North. Global South and Global North are concepts used to distinguish between developed and developing countries in social, economic, and political contexts. This study aims to analyze the views of utilitarianism versus communalism in understanding intellectual property rights in Global North and Global South countries. This study is a normative legal study that prioritizes conceptual, historical, and philosophical approaches. The results of the study confirm that the differences in views between Global North and Global South countries on intellectual property reflect global economic and political inequality. Global North countries support strict intellectual property protection to maintain their economic and technological dominance, while Global South countries want a more flexible system to ensure fair access to technology, medicines, and protection of traditional knowledge. Global North countries see IP protection as a driver of innovation and economic growth, based on the theory of utilitarianism, while Global South countries prioritize the principle of communalism to ensure fair access to technology and knowledge. To achieve balance, inclusive policies, international cooperation in research and development, and integration of communal values ​​in IP policies are needed, in order to create social justice and redistribution of global wealth
The Business Legal Policy in Indonesia, Ghana, and Vietnam: A Perspective from the Theory of Dignified Justice Kurniawan, I Gede Agus; Putu Aras Samsithawrati; Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Thuong, Mac Thi Hoai; Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): May, 2025: Law, Technology, and Globalization: Challenges and Innovations in th
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v9i1.18096

Abstract

This study aims to compare business law policies in Indonesia, Ghana, and Vietnam from the perspective of dignified justice and analyze the challenges and opportunities in their implementation. This research employs a normative legal method with statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches to analyze business law policies in Indonesia, Ghana, and Vietnam from the perspective of dignified justice. The study’s findings reveal that business law policies in Indonesia, Ghana, and Vietnam have unique characteristics influenced by their respective legal systems, histories, and socio-economic conditions. The main challenges include complex bureaucracy, regulatory uncertainty, weak law enforcement, and widespread corruption, which hinder transparency and fair business competition. Indonesia adopts a mixed legal system with reforms such as the Omnibus Law (Job Creation Law) to simplify regulations. However, it still faces issues in licensing and legal protection for SMEs. Ghana, operating under a common law system, seeks to strengthen corporate governance through the Companies Act 2019 but continues to struggle with capital access and burdensome bureaucracy for businesses. Meanwhile, Vietnam, with its socialist legal system, has encouraged private sector growth through reforms like the Law on Enterprises 2020 but still faces challenges related to regulatory transparency and labor protection. All three countries have opportunities to enhance economic competitiveness through bureaucratic digitalization, more transparent legal reforms, and broader support for SMEs and startups. With more inclusive and stable policies, they can establish a fairer and more sustainable business law system from the perspective of dignified justice.
The Philosophy of Justice in Business Law: A Comparative Study of Ethical Values in Ghana and Indonesia’s Constitutional Frameworks Kurniawan, I Gede Agus; Putu Aras Samsithawrati; Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo; Thuong, Mac Thi Hoai
Indonesian State Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Indonesian State Law Review, April 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v8i1.18111

Abstract

The role of the philosophy of justice in business law as a moral and normative foundation that ensures economic activities are not only oriented towards technical efficiency but also uphold principles of justice such as distributive, commutative, and fairness. The philosophy of justice is closely related to constitutional values because the constitution not only regulates legal norms but also contains ethics and social goals that must be reflected in business regulations. Not only regulates legal norms but also contains ethics and social goals that must be reflected in business regulations. This research aims to analyze the philosophy of justice in business law in relation to the principles and values in the constitution and ethical values of a country, with a legal comparison between Indonesia and Ghana. This research is a normative legal study with a conceptual, comparative legal, and legislative approach. The research findings affirm that a comparative study with Ghana shows that although both countries emphasize the importance of ethical and just economic governance based on constitutional values, their approaches differ. Indonesia has a structured system based on the constitution and the interpretation of the Constitutional Court, whereas Ghana relies on a pluralistic legal framework and sectoral regulations that are not fully integrated with the constitution. This difference highlights the importance of the role of the constitution and the judiciary in realizing fair, transparent, and sustainable business law.
IMPLEMENTING RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN JUVENILE NARCOTICS CASES IN INDONESIA: ROLES, CHALLENGES, AND OPPORTUNITIES Rubianti, Ni Kadek Sri Novi Wirani; Gorda, A.A.A. Ngurah Tini Rusmini; Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 27, No 2: August 2025: Islam and Justice development in Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v27i2.45040

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of restorative justice in juvenile criminal cases involving narcotics and psychotropic substances in Indonesia, focusing on the roles of law enforcement officers, families, and communities. Employing a normative legal research method, the study utilizes statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that the application of restorative justice in such cases offers a recovery-oriented solution rather than punishment, as regulated by the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law (UU SPPA) and the Narcotics Law. Through diversion mechanisms, juveniles involved in narcotics abuse can undergo rehabilitation without undergoing a criminal justice process that could adversely affect their future. This process involves collaboration among law enforcement officers, families, and communities, where law enforcement facilitates rehabilitation, families provide emotional support and guidance, and communities work to eliminate stigma, enabling juveniles to return to school or normal activities. However, challenges remain, including limited rehabilitation facilities, a lack of understanding among law enforcement officers regarding restorative justice principles, and persistent social stigma against juveniles involved in narcotics cases. Therefore, enhancing the capacity of law enforcement personnel and developing child-friendly rehabilitation facilities are essential steps to ensure the effective implementation of restorative justice within the juvenile criminal justice system.
Co-Authors Budiana, I Nyoman Disantara, Fradhana Putra Gorda, A.A.A. Ngurah Tini Rusmini I Gede Agus Kurniawan Putu Aras Samsithawrati Rubianti, Ni Kadek Sri Novi Wirani Thuong , Mac Thi Hoai Thuong, Mac Thi Hoai