Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Needs Analysis Of Scientific Article Writing Training For English Teachers: A Mixed Method Dewi Wardah Mazidatur Rohmah; Muhammad Dhika Arif Rizqon; Nuraziza Aliah; Sitti Jamilah; Siti Hadianti
International Journal of Education and Literature Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): August : International Journal of Education and Literature
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/ijel.v2i2.82

Abstract

Writing and publishing scientific papers is something that is not only important for researchers, but also for teachers who teach in junior high to high school related to the need to increase teacher professionalism. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the need for training in the ability to write scientific articles in English teachers. This research employs mixed methods whereby quantitative data analysis will be supported by qualitative analysis. Purposive random sampling was used in the selection of research respondents which involved 30 teachers as a sample of a total of 150 English teacher population. This analysis was carried out based on the factors that can affect the difficulty of the process of writing scientific papers including the writing environment; obstacles caused by the topic of writing; the author’s motivation; and the processes, knowledge, and skills involved in writing. The results of this study are expected to be able to become a reference in developing writing training, especially for English teachers and can be an evaluation for teachers about the actions that must be taken to develop the ability to write scientific pap
"Not lazier, I'm Sharper with AI": Analyzing How Artificial Intelligence Restructures Students’ Cognition Sitti Jamilah; Nyak Mutia Ismail; Sepri Kurniadi
Jurnal Sociohumaniora Kodepena (JSK) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Sosiohumaniora Kodepena
Publisher : Kodepena Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54423/jsk.v6i1.209

Abstract

This qualitative case study explores how AI assistance influences students’ cognition in English academic writing. With 18 undergraduate students in an Academic Writing course as research participants, the study compares assignments and reflections that were created with and without the aid of AI. Data were collected through two main sources: a set of written assignments (one non-AI-assisted and one AI-assisted per student) and reflective personal statements detailing students’ learning experiences. The primary instruments included a qualitative analytic framework adapted from a writing rubric to guide close reading and thematic coding of both assignments and reflections. Data analysis was conducted through comparative content analysis and thematic analysis, focusing on key dimensions such as argumentation, organization, creativity, grammar, and real-world awareness. The findings suggest that AI-assisted writing not only supports surface-level features, such as grammar and vocabulary, but also fosters deeper argument, organization, and critical engagement skills. Many students expressed greater confidence and an enhanced awareness of problems in the world, saying that AI had led the way to more effective, independent thinking; but the analysis emphasizes that the extent of cognitive reframing varies significantly depending on how purposefully and critically students interact with AI tools. Conclusively, the results contribute to the ongoing discussion of AI in higher education: when used thoughtfully, AI can be a complementary pedagogical partner that enhances higher order thinking and self-efficacy. The study recommends further research in different contexts and on long-term outcomes.