Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Optimizing the Implementation of Beneficial Ownership in Transfer Pricing in Taxes as a Corporate Crime Kamilah, Anita; Khan, Md Zubair Kasem
Lex Publica Vol. 8 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : APPTHI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (266.977 KB) | DOI: 10.58829/lp.8.2.2021.47-64

Abstract

Tax is a source of state revenue that plays a major role in financing all state expenditures, including financing national development. The absence of counter-performance that the taxpayer can directly accept is one of the causes of tax crimes committed by corporations through transfer pricing practices, which are difficult to hold accountable, so it is necessary to optimize the application of the principle of Beneficial ownership (BO). The aim of this research is to examine the factors that cause transfer pricing as a form of corporate crime, the application of Beneficial ownership principles in the field of taxation, and the obstacles encountered in implementing Beneficial ownership in the field of taxation along with the solutions. The method is a normative juridical approach, descriptive-analytical research specifications, data types, and sources are derived from secondary data through the support of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials, and data analysis is carried out qualitatively. The results of the study explain that transfer pricing is a corporate crime that is supported by the use of earnings management, the use of opportunities for special relationships, the support of political connections, and thin capitalization. The application of the principle of Beneficial ownership in the field of taxation means that owners are entitled to enjoy income in the form of dividends, interest and/or royalties, which both individual and corporate taxpayers receive. The obstacles faced in implementing BO in the field of taxation are the weak update of information on Beneficial owners and their changes and partial and sectoral regulations. Abstrak Pajak merupakan salah satu sumber pendapatan negara yang berperan besar dalam membiayai semua pengeluaran negara termasuk membiayai pembangunan nasional. Tidak adanya kontra prestasi yang langsung dapat diterima wajib pajak menjadi salah satu penyebab terjadinya kejahatan di bidang perpajakan yang dilakukan korporasi melalui praktik transfer pricing, yang sulit untuk dimintai pertanggungjawabannya sehingga perlu dioptimalkan penerapan prinsip Beneficial ownership (BO). Tujuan penelitian untuk mengkaji faktor-faktor penyebab terjadinya transfer pricing sebagai bentuk kejahatan korporasi, penerapan prinsip Beneficial ownership di bidang perpajakan dan kendala yang dihadapi dalam menerapkan Beneficial ownership di bidang perpajakan disertai solusinya. Metode pendekatan yuridis normatif, spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analisis, jenis dan sumber data berasal dari data sekunder melalui dukungan bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier, dan analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa transfer pricing merupakan kejahatan korporasi yang didukung pemanfaatan manajemen laba, pemanfaatan peluang hubungan istimewa, dukungan political connection dan thin capitalization. Penerapan prinsip Beneficial ownership di bidang perpajakan merupakan pemilik yang berhak menikmati penghasilan berupa deviden,bunga dan atau royalti, yang diterima baik wajib pajak perorangan maupun wajib pajak badan. Kendala-kendala yang dihadapi dalam menerapkan (BO) di bidang perpajakan yaitu lemahnya update informasi Beneficial owner maupun perubahannya, serta regulasi yang bersifat parsial dan bersifat sektoral. Kata kunci: Kejahatan Korporasi, Perpajakan, Transfer Pricing, Beneficial Ownership
Legal Certainty in Land Rights Acquisition in Indonesia’s National Land Law Widiyono, Try; Khan, Md Zubair Kasem
LAW REFORM Vol 19, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v19i1.48393

Abstract

Acquisition of land rights has been a protracted issue due to the complexity of land laws and regulations in Indonesia. This situation often leads to illegal land disputes and conflicts. This research investigated the aspect of legal certainty in land rights based on Indonesian laws and regulations. This study focused on the aspects of legal certainty in several laws and regulations related to land rights and examined the implications of the Law on Land Acquisition and Government Regulations (PP) of 2021 concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Flat Units, and Land Registration. The research methods involved a qualitative approach with a normative and juridical approach. The research results highlight significant progress in recent regulations, such as the Perppu Cipta Kerja 2022 and PP 2021 concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Flat Units, and Land Registration, regarding more efficient and transparent procedures in providing legal certainty in obtaining the rights above ground. This finding implies the need for continuous improvement to strengthen legal certainty and to protect the rights of all parties. This research emphasizes the importance of harmonizing laws and regulations to create a conducive environment for the responsible and sustainable acquisition of land rights in Indonesia.
Shaping Artificial Intelligence Governance and Risk Management in the Public Sector: Regulatory Insights Sulistyantoro, Gandung Troy; Khaq, Akhsanul; Khan, Md Zubair Kasem; Al Amin; Hussain, Abdullah-Al-Monzur
Lex Publica Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : APPTHI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58829/lp.11.1.2024.261

Abstract

As AI continues to transform public services by enhancing efficiency, transparency, and decision-making, it also brings forth significant challenges related to data privacy and misuse. This research explores the intersection of risk management and AI governance within Indonesia's public administration, by conceptualizing how Indonesia's legal frameworks, regulations, and policies should evolve to accommodate AI technologies responsibly. The research employs a conceptual approach to analyze existing laws, including the Personal Data Protection Act and the Information and Electronic Transactions Law, alongside international best practices. The findings emphasize the need for a clear and cohesive regulatory framework that governs AI usage, with a focus on data privacy, ethical AI use, and transparency. It is concluded that Indonesia must strengthen its data protection laws, address the shortage of AI professionals, and improve infrastructure to ensure the responsible implementation of AI in public administration.
Music Copyright Protection in the Digital Era: Legal Framework and Strategies for Enforcement Panjaitan, Hulman; Betlehn, Andrew; Situmeang, Tomson; Khan, Md Zubair Kasem; Miraz, Mahadi Hasan
Jurnal Hukum Vol 40, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jh.40.2.235-257

Abstract

This research investigates the factors contributing to global music copyright infringement in the digital era, the legal framework established by Indonesian Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright, and strategies for strengthening protection. Using a doctrinal legal research approach, the study incorporates statutory and comparative legal analyses to assess the effectiveness of Indonesia’s copyright laws and proposed strategies. The findings indicate that digital piracy globally is primarily driven by technological advances, the ease of sharing pirated content, and inconsistent international copyright laws. These issues have resulted in significant financial losses for creators and the rise of new forms of piracy. In Indonesia, while Law Number 28 of 2014 provides robust protections for creators, including economic and moral rights, enforcement remains problematic due to low public awareness and the rapid pace of technological advancements. Key institutions, such as the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual/DJKI) and Collective Management Institutions (Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif Nasional/LMKN), play a critical role in enforcement but need further support. The study recommends strengthening legal frameworks, international harmonization, and leveraging technological solutions such as blockchain to improve copyright enforcement in Indonesia and ensure fair compensation for artists.