Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Petitum Law Journal
Mauritius, Darius
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Sistem Pembagian Tanah Warisan Serta Peran Tetua Adat dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Tanah Menurut Hukum Adat Manggarai Filio, Krisostomus Raka; Aloysius, Sukardan; Mauritius, Darius
Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Vol. 13 No. 02 (2024): Artikel Riset Maret 2024
Publisher : Information Technology and Science (ITScience)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47709/jhb.v13i02.3659

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimanakah sistem pembagian tanah warisan menurut hukum adat Manggarai serta peran tetua adat dalam penyelesaian konflik tanah warisan menurut hukum adat Manggarai. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis empiris, yaitu: penelitian yang dilakukan langsung ke pihak terkait agar dapat mendapatkan informasi tentang masalah yang diteliti. Terdapat 2 cara teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan yaitu; wawancara, peneliti melakukan tanya jawab dengan responden yang telah ditentukan dengan berpedoman pada daftar pertanyaan yang telah disiapkan. Yang kedua dengan cara studi kepustakaan, yaitu suatu bentuk pengumpulan data lewat membaca buku literatur, hasil penelitian terdahulu dan dokumen-dokumen yang berhubungan dengan topik penelitian. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, masyarakat Manggarai menganut sistem pewarisan patrilineal yang dimana hanya anak laki-laki yang berhak mendapatkan warisan berupa tanah. Peran tua adat dalam penyelesaian konflik tanah warisan adalah sebagai penengah dalam penyelesaian secara lonto leok (musyawarah adat masyarakat Manggarai) dan bertindak sebagai saksi jika masalah tersebut tidak bisa diselesaikan secara adat sehingga ditempuh melalui jalur hukum.  Masyarakat Manggarai menganut sistem waris patrilineal serta peran tetua adat dalam penyelesaian konflik tanah waris adalah sebagai penengah.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TANDA BUKTI HAK SEBAGAI PETUNJUK KEPEMILIKAN HAK ATAS TANAH (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NOMOR 41/PDT.BTH/2019/PN KUPANG) Wungo, Anna Xaveria Ekaputri; Mauritius, Darius; Bire, Chatryen M Dju
Petitum Law Journal Vol 2 No 2 (2025): Petitum Law Journal Volume 2, Nomor 2, Mei 2025
Publisher : Petitum Law Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35508/pelana.v2i2.18886

Abstract

Land disputes in Indonesia often give rise to complex legal problems, especially those related to certainty of ownership of land rights. This research aims to analyze the strength of evidence in the land dispute between CF as the plaintiff and LT as the defendant, based on Court Decision Number 41/PDT.BTH/2019/PN Kupang. This case involves land located in Oepura Village, Kupang City, which is claimed as inheritance by both parties. The research method used is normative juridical research with a case approach. Data was obtained through literature study and analysis of documents submitted in the trial. The evidence examined includes Certificates of Ownership Rights, Land Reform Letters, as well as various previous court decisions. The research results showed that the evidence submitted by the plaintiff, even though it included formal documents such as Certificates of Ownership and Supreme Court Decisions, was considered not clear enough in describing the boundaries of the disputed land. On the other hand, the evidence presented by the defendant, including previous court decisions and executorial letters, is considered stronger because it shows continuity of ownership and legal validity. The conclusion of this research is that in land disputes, the court not only considers formal documents such as land certificates, but also the clarity of the land object in dispute. The strength and consistency of evidence is the main factor in determining the direction of the court's decision. In this case, the court sided with the defendant because the evidence presented was stronger and supported the land ownership claim.
Co-Authors Aloysius, Sukardan Bire, Chatryen M Dju Filio, Krisostomus Raka Wungo, Anna Xaveria Ekaputri