Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Legalita Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum
Saputra, M. Laskar Ando
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kritik Terhadap Presiden ditinjau dari Perspektif Kebebasan Berpendapat Dharmawan, Achmad Adhi; Riyantina, Dila; Milda, Osa; Saputra, M. Laskar Ando; Firdaus, M. Faqih
Legalita Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Jurnal Hukum Legalita
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47637/legalita.v5i2.940

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine criticism of the President from the perspective of freedom of expression. One of the main ways of realizing the fundamental democratic ideals of freedom of expression in a democratic system is through criticism of political leaders. This study investigates how public opinion, government policies, and political dynamics are affected by presidential criticism. Document analysis, surveys, and interviews with members of different social groups activists, political party members, and the general public are part of the methodology of this study. The data collected was analyzed to determine the trend of public criticism of the President and how these views are shaped by their opinions on freedom of expression. Some respondents felt that the President's right to freedom of expression was upheld, while others felt there were considerable limitations. Public opinion is heavily influenced by criticism of the president, and policy changes may be brought about by such criticism. The study also emphasizes the difficulties and dangers of the right to freedom of expression when the President is criticized. The study also emphasized the importance of traditional and social media to enable the President to take action and convey different viewpoints. The findings of this study highlight the importance of maintaining free speech to preserve the democratic process and provide insights into how democracy works. The findings have important consequences for our understanding of how, in contemporary democracies, criticism of political leaders and free speech interact. The findings of this study add to the body of knowledge on democracy and freedom of expression while providing a useful framework for policymakers and advocates of change.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN FISIK DALAM RUMAH TANGGA: STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 58/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Kbu Saputra, M. Laskar Ando; Fadhilah, Nisa; Haryadi, Slamet
Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 4, No 02 (2025): Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jaeap.v4i02.4114

Abstract

Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) telah menjadi masalah besar di Indonesia dan masih meluas. Meskipun Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 telah mengatur penghapusan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga, namun kasus KDRT semakin meningkat. Berdasarkan data Komnas Perempuan, terdapat 445.502 kasus KDRT pada tahun 2024, sedangkan pada tahun 2023 jumlahnya menjadi 401.975 kasus. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk memahami penerapan hukum dalam kasus KDRT dengan menganalisis putusan majelis hakim. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan hukum normatif dengan menganalisis putusan 58/Pid. Sus/2024/PN Kbu. Penelitian ini didasarkan pada sumber primer dan sekunder seperti putusan pengadilan, undang-undang terkait serta artikel dan jurnal akademis tentang kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis deduktif untuk menarik kesimpulan logis berdasarkan prinsip-prinsip hukum yang relevan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan sistem peradilan dalam memberikan perlindungan kepada korban KDRT. Hakim mempertimbangkan faktor-faktor yang memberatkan dan meringankan dalam menentukan hukuman dengan menggunakan teori gabungan untuk menyesuaikan sanksi dengan tingkat kesalahan pelaku. Putusan ini mencerminkan penerapan keadilan yang merata serta komitmen untuk mencegah kekerasan di masa depan.
Co-Authors Dharmawan, Achmad Adhi Firdaus, M. Faqih Milda, Osa Nisa Fadhilah Riyantina, Dila Slamet Haryadi