Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Facing Differences: Ethics and Boundaries in Disagreement Amatullah, Asda; Maghfiroh, Zakiyah Laili; Apriantoro, Muhamad Subhi
Ethica: International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Studies Vol 2 No 3 (2024): September
Publisher : Global Research Network

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Adhering to the Qur’an and the Sunnah is an obligation for every Muslim without exception. Ikhtilaf refers to the divergence between two parties in their quest for truth. Differences, pros and cons, will always arise in the dynamics of life. Disagreements among Muslims can be something beautiful. Differences of opinion, within the framework of knowledge, are considered a blessing; they enrich knowledge and understanding. Many issues faced by the Muslim community already have their foundations and references in the form of evidence from the Qur'an and Hadith. Proper etiquette in responding to differences includes adhering to a balanced methodology, avoiding extremism in religion, refraining from fanaticism toward individuals or groups, maintaining good assumptions about others, and avoiding quarrels and debates.
Interpretasi Qiwamah dalam Tafsir Klasik dan Kontemporer: Analisis Keadilan Gender Berbasis Maqashid Al-Syari‘ah Maghfiroh, Zakiyah Laili; Kharis Nugroho
Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian, Penerbitan dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP3M) IAIFA Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the concept of gender justice in Islamic family law through the perspective of maqashid al-syari’ah, with a particular focus on the concept of qiwamah. The main issue addressed in this research is the tendency to interpret religious texts literally, which often leads to unequal relations between husbands and wives in family life. This research employs a qualitative method with a normative approach based on library research, by examining classical exegetical works such as those of At-Ṭhabari, Ar-Razi, and Wahbah Az-Zuḥaili, and relating them to contemporary social realities. The findings indicate that the concept of qiwamah in classical interpretations is not understood as an absolute form of male superiority, but rather as a functional responsibility related to social and economic aspects. The maqashid al-syari’ah approach provides a more contextual analytical framework by emphasizing public welfare (maṣlaḥah) as the primary objective of Islamic law. In this perspective, the relationship between husband and wife is viewed as a partnership based on justice, cooperation, and mutual consultation. Therefore, gender justice in Islamic family law is not defined as absolute equality of roles, but as a fair, proportional, and contextual distribution of rights and obligations, enabling Islamic law to remain relevant and responsive to social dynamics.