Dwi Atmaja, Bima Kumara
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

TINDAK PIDANA PENYERANGAN MARTABAT PRESIDEN DAN/ATAU WAKIL PRESIDEN DALAM PERSPEKTIF NEGARA INTEGRALISTIK Dimastio, Riski; Dwi Atmaja, Bima Kumara
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 12 No 8 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2024.v12.i08.p13

Abstract

Karya ilmiah ini ditulis untuk memberikan ulasan mengenai urgensi Tindak Pidana Penyerangan Martabat Presiden dan/atau Wakil presiden tetap dipertahankan dalam KUHP serta analisis mengenai landasan sosio-filosofisnya ditinjau berdasarkan pemikiran negara integralistik yang dikemukakan oleh Soepomo. Karya ilmiah ini ditulis dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif serta pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan filsafat. Hasil studi ini menunjukkan bahwa Tindak Pidana Penyerangan Martabat Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden berkaitan dengan pemikiran Soepomo tentang paham negara integralistik yang dikemukakan dalam pidatonya di sidang BPUPKI. Pengaturan tentang Tindak Pidana Penyerangan Martabat Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden dimunculkan kembali dalam KUHP karena sesuai dengan corak masyarakat Indonesia yang berasas kekeluargaan, dimana jika pemimpin atau presidennya dihina, maka masyarakat akan mencela perbuatan tersebut. Masyarakat Indonesia memandang bahwa kepala negara merupakan personifikasi daripada negaranya sendiri. Namun dalam perkembangan Indonesia sebagai negara demokrasi maka pasal penghinaan Presiden dalam KUHP diubah formulasi pasalnya dengan perubahan yang sebelumnya delik biasa menjadi delik aduan serta terdapat juga pembedaan pengertian antara penghinaan atau penyerangan martabat dengan kritik terhadap Presiden dan Wakil Presiden. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan sosialisasi yang masif kepada aparat penegak hukum terkait pasal-pasal tersebut agar tidak justru digunakan untuk mengkriminalisasi masyarakat ketika menggunakan hak kebebasan berekspresi dan berpendapatnya yang sejatinya dilindungi oleh konstitusi. ABSTRACT This scientific paper is written to provide an overview of the urgency of the Crime of Assaulting the Dignity of the President and/or Vice President to be maintained in the Criminal Code as well as an analysis of its socio-philosophical basis based on the idea of Integralistic State proposed by Prof Soepomo. This scientific paper was written using normative legal research methods with a statutory and philosophical approach. This study shows that the criminal act of attacking the dignity of the President and/or Vice President is related to Soepomo's thoughts about the concept of an integralistic state put forward in his speech at the BPUPKI session. The Crime of Assaulting the Dignity of the President and Vice President is maintained in the Criminal Code because of the family spirit of the Indonesian people, where if the head of state is attacked or insulted, the community will not be able to accept this or reproach him. Indonesian people view that the head of state is a personification of their own country. However, in the development of Indonesia as a democratic country, of the crime of assaulting the dignity of the President and/or Vice President in the Criminal Code has changed the article formulation. Previously, ordinary offenses became complaint offenses and there was also a difference in understanding between insulting and criticizing the President and/or Vice President. So that massive socialization is needed to law enforcement officials regarding the criminal act of assaulting the dignity of the President and Vice President in the new Criminal Code so that this article does not criminalize the public when exercising their right to freedom of expression and opinion which is actually protected by the constitution.
ASPEK MEDIKOLEGAL KORBAN LUKA AKIBAT ZAT KIMIA KOROSIF Tjandra, David Christopher; Krisnadewi Rahadi, Putu Nindya; Pratiwi, Cokorda Agung; Pradnyani, Ayu Mas Eka; Suwarya, Dwi Nurcahya Ananda; Arabani, Jessica Jevera; Dwi Atmaja, Bima Kumara
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 12 No 9 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2024.v12.i09.p05

Abstract

Luka kimiawi merupakan suatu tipe trauma yang disebabkan oleh bahan kimia dengan sifat asam dan basa. Bahan kimia ini dapat disalahgunakan untuk melukai orang lain. Salah satu persoalan hukum dari penggunaan zat kimia korosif yang melukai orang lain adalah vitriolage atau serangan menggunakan asam. Setiap kasus perlukaan atau trauma yang terjadi akibat zat kimia korosif memiliki penanganan, sistematika penegakkan diagnosis, serta aspek medikolegal yang berbeda-beda. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pemeriksaan forensik luka yang diakibatkan oleh zat kimia korosif, memahami aspek medikolegal pada korban dengan luka akibat zat kimia korosif, serta menganalisis penanganan medis dan perlindungan hukum pada korban tersebut. Metode penulisan yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan mengikuti kaidah ilmiah yang didasarkan pada logika ilmu hukum normatif untuk mencapai kebenaran. Penulis mengadopsi pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemeriksaan forensik terhadap luka akibat zat kimia korosif melibatkan evaluasi luar untuk mengamati tanda korosif pada kulit dan mukosa serta pemeriksaan dalam untuk menilai kerusakan pada organ internal seperti traktus digestivus, paru-paru, dan saluran cerna. Aspek medikolegal pada korban dengan luka akibat zat kimia korosif melibatkan identifikasi zat kimia, penilaian derajat luka, dokumentasi bukti forensik, pemberian bantuan medis, dan kesaksian ahli dalam proses hukum. Penanganan medis meliputi bilasan hati-hati, pemberian antidotum, analgesik, cairan intravena, dan perawatan simptomatik sesuai dengan jenis zat kimia, sedangkan perlindungan hukum mencakup penganiayaan dengan ancaman pidana maksimal 2 tahun 8 bulan atau denda maksimal empat ribu lima ratus rupiah serta penganiayaan yang menyebabkan kematian dengan ancaman pidana maksimal tujuh tahun. ABSTRACT Chemical injuries result from acidic and alkaline chemicals, which can be misused to harm others, leading to legal issues like vitriolage or acid attacks. Each case requires unique management and has distinct medicolegal aspects. This study aims to determine the forensic examination of injuries caused by corrosive chemicals, understand the medicolegal aspects of victims with injuries caused by corrosive chemicals, and analyze the medical treatment and legal protection for these victims. The writing method used is normative juridical by following scientific principles based on the logic of normative legal science to achieve truth. The author adopts a conceptual approach and an approach based on legislation. Forensic examination of injuries caused by corrosive chemicals involves external evaluation to observe corrosive signs on the skin and mucous membranes, as well as internal examination to assess damage to internal organs such as the digestive tract, lungs, and intestines. The medicolegal aspects of victims with injuries caused by corrosive chemicals involve identifying the chemicals, assessing the degree of injury, documenting forensic evidence, providing medical assistance, and expert testimony in legal proceedings. Medical management of injuries caused by corrosive chemicals includes careful flushing, administration of antidotes, analgesics, intravenous fluids, and symptomatic treatment according to the type of chemical, while legal protection includes assault with a maximum criminal penalty of 2 years and 8 months or a maximum fine of four thousand five hundred rupiahs and assault resulting in death with a maximum criminal penalty of seven years.
Developing Effective Procedures for Public Participation in Spatial Planning Regulation in Indonesia: Lesson Learned from Australia Widiatedja, I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit; Ranawijaya, Ida Bagus Erwin; Purwani, Sagung Putri ME; Dwi Atmaja, Bima Kumara
PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 10, No 3 (2023): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Public participation is a crucial aspect of spatial planning, serving to achieve sustainable development objectives. The Indonesian government has recognized this fact andincorporated public participation in its spatial planning lawsand regulations. However, procedures for involving the public have been criticized for lacking genuine participation, highlighting opportunities for public input only being offeredformally. Meanwhile, public participation is considered a significant component of spatial planning regulation in Australia, particularly in Victoria. The government has involved the public in various stages of the planning process, including creating a planning scheme, issuing planning permits, and completing planning agreements. Based on the established procedures under current Australian legislation, this study aims to provide a practical solution by examining and contrasting the role of public participation in spatial planning regulation between Indonesia and Australia. This study concluded that Indonesia might consider adopting Australia's strategy and setting up planning panels to regulate spatial planning. Planning agreements can also be advantageous, particularly for large-scale or mega projects that significantly negatively impact the environment and local communities. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n3.a5