Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia
KMS Herman
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
KEJAHATAN GENOSIDA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA INTERNASIONAL Taufiqurokhman; KMS Herman
Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 23 No 1 (2024): Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum XXIII:1:2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Langlangbuana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32816/paramarta.v23i1.540

Abstract

Penelitian tujuannya mengetahui tindak kejahatan genosida yang dialami persfektif hukum internasional, dan cara penyelesaian sengketa tindak kejahatan genosida secara hukum internasional. Kejahatan genosida tindakan yang dilakukan tujuannya menghancurkan, secara keseluruhan sebagian suatu kelompok nasional, etnis, ras, atau agama. Hukum pidana internasional cabang hukum pidana diakui komunitas internasional, memerlukan respons hukum global dan kejahatan sanggat serius. Kejahatan genosida hukum pidana internasional merupakan kejahatan luar biasa, sudah menjadi tindakan dilarang, dituangkan di Konvensi Genosida 1948, statuta International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), statuta International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda (ICTR), statuta Roma 1998. Penelitian menggunakan hukum doktrinal atau yuridis normatif. Sumber informasi hukum, bahan hukum primer (peraturan, dokumen terkait) dianalisis secara kualitatif. Pendekatannya konseptual, perundang-undangan, kasus hukum dalam mengatasi rumusan masalah. Hasil penelitian menyebutkan penyebab utama kejahatan genosida dilatarbelakangi perjuangan hak dari suku minoritas, agama yang fanatik, rasial yang ditunjukkan dalam diskriminasi kultural
Dynamics of Changes in the Representative Structure in the MPR RI Post-Amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Its Implications for the Function of the State Representative Institution Rosando, Rosando; KMS Herman
Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia
Publisher : PT. ALHAFI BERKAH INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62007/joumi.v3i2.494

Abstract

This study examines the dynamics of changes in the representative structure in the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) of the Republic of Indonesia after the amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, especially related to the elimination of the Group Representative element in MPR membership. This change has a significant impact on the existence of the MPR as a state representative institution, both in relation to its role and function in the Indonesian state system. This study aims to analyze the implications of the elimination of the Group Representative on the function of people's representation, as well as its impact on the legislative process and political decision-making in Indonesia. With a legal analysis approach, this study reveals how these changes reflect the evolution of the representative system in Indonesia and assess whether the MPR can still carry out its functions effectively in the context of post-reform democracy.
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Protection of Palembang Songket Weaving as Traditional Cultural Heritage in Indonesia Merry Aryanti; KMS Herman
Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia
Publisher : PT. ALHAFI BERKAH INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62007/joumi.v3i2.486

Abstract

The Palembang songket woven fabric is one of Indonesia’s traditional crafts that holds high historical, cultural, and economic value. It is a cultural heritage with deep historical roots dating back to the era of the Palembang Darussalam Sultanate. Songket fabric is not only a symbol of textile aesthetics but also represents spiritual values and the social structure of the traditional Palembang community. With its distinctive weaving techniques and rich motifs, the philosophical meaning of songket has become an intangible cultural expression passed down through generations. However, in the era of globalization and the expansion of the modern textile industry, songket faces various challenges, including unauthorized commercial exploitation, design counterfeiting, and the degradation of cultural values. This study aims to analyze the legal protection mechanisms through Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) for Palembang songket as traditional cultural heritage. The method used is normative-juridical research, with analysis of national regulations such as Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright, Law Number 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, and international conventions such as the 2008 UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. This study applies an IPR framework with a collective rights and cultural approach, alongside regional regulations like the South Sumatra Provincial Regulation Number 5 of 2015 on the Preservation and Development of Regional Culture. This regulation emphasizes the importance of developing a commodity-based protection system and incorporating customary law to preserve and economically empower local artisan communities. Adequate legal protection will strengthen songket's position as both a cultural identity and a sustainable economic asset. The results of this research recommend an integrative approach between positive law and culturally-based commodity empowerment to establish fair, sustainable, and contextual protection for Palembang songket woven fabric as an inseparable part of Indonesia’s cultural identity.
The Authority of Judges to Independently Determine the Amount of State Financial Losses in Verdicts on Corruption Cases KMS Herman; Anesia, Nila; Rukmana, Indra Jaya; Amelia, Rini Fitri Octa; Marpaung, Raja Robert
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6650

Abstract

Law enforcement in corruption cases in Indonesia often faces challenges related to proving the element of state financial loss. One of the issues that arises is the authority of judges to independently determine the amount of state loss without relying on an official audit by state audit institutions such as the Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK) or the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP). This study employs a normative juridical research method using a statute approach and an analytical approach to examine the legal basis, judicial practices, and implications of such authority. The findings indicate that although Article 183 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) grants judges the authority to decide based on at least two valid pieces of evidence, the absence of an official audit can lead to legal uncertainty, the risk of judicial error, and violations of the defendant’s right to a fair trial. Therefore, harmonization between regulations and judicial practice is necessary to ensure legal certainty, protection of human rights, and the effectiveness of corruption eradication.
The Domination of Political Power over Legal Politics in the Deliberation of the Asset Forfeiture Bill KMS Herman; Pribowo, Johan Budi Sapto; Rumondor, Nova Ernny; Zamri, Hasby Muhammad; Budiawan, Taufik
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.6763

Abstract

The Asset Forfeiture Bill (RUU Perampasan Aset) is an important instrument in strengthening the eradication of corruption crimes, as it provides a legal basis for the state to seize assets resulting from corruption without having to wait for a legally binding criminal verdict. Although it was proposed as early as 2010 and included in the National Legislation Program (Prolegnas) 2015–2019, the discussion of the bill has often been delayed. In 2023, the government and the House of Representatives (DPR) included the Asset Forfeiture Bill in the 2023 Prolegnas. However, until the end of the DPR RI’s and the government’s 2019–2024 term, the bill had yet to be passed. This research aims to analyze the domination of political power in the lawmaking process concerning the Asset Forfeiture Bill. The study uses a normative juridical method with a literature study approach. The issues examined include: (1) the legal condition of asset forfeiture in Indonesia; (2) the dynamics of the debate that have caused delays in the passage of the Asset Forfeiture Bill; and (3) the political factors that influence the stagnation of the bill's ratification amid strong public pressure.The results of the study show: first, that the legal regulation of asset forfeiture in Indonesia still experiences a significant normative void. Although regulations related to the forfeiture of assets resulting from corruption are stipulated in Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001, there is no comprehensive provision regarding asset forfeiture from perpetrators who have fled, cannot be found, or have died without heirs. Therefore, special regulations on asset forfeiture are needed, including the management of ownerless assets as state assets. Second, the delay in the discussion of the Asset Forfeiture Bill is influenced by the inconsistency of legislative priorities in the DPR, concerns about potential human rights violations, and the intervention of political and economic interests involving various parties. Third, although there is strong public pressure, internal political dynamics within the DPR remain the main obstacle. Disagreements between factions, concerns over the political implications of regulatory implementation, and the absence of consensus on a legal model that aligns with human rights principles are dominant factors slowing the legislative process
Co-Authors Amelia, Rini Fitri Octa Anesia, Nila Budiawan, Taufik Marpaung, Raja Robert Merry Aryanti Pribowo, Johan Budi Sapto Rosando, Rosando Rukmana, Indra Jaya Rumondor, Nova Ernny Taufiqurokhman Zamri, Hasby Muhammad