Articles
Geographical Indications As An Alternative To Save The Potential Product Of Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) In Sragen Regency
Triyono Adi Saputro;
Yudho Taruno Muryanto;
Suraji Suraji
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 8, No 3: December 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29303/ius.v8i3.832
This research was conducted as an effort to analyze the MSMEs’ products of Sragen Regency which have not been known and have the potential to be granted legal protection through geographical indications. This research is an empirical legal research with primary and secondary legal basic materials. The research location was carried out in Kalijambe Sub-district with data collection techniques through literature study and direct interviews with local governments and businessmen in Sangiran. The result of the research is that in Sragen Regency, there is a product which can be categorized as geographical indication and has good prospects for the long term and is able to maintain the reputation of the existing area in Sragen. The product is Sangiran’s fossil stone handicraft, which is a potential superior product to be registered through geographical indications, so that registration with geographical indications can be used as an effort to save potential MSMEs’ products in Sragen Regency by the fossil stone handicrafts in Kalijambe Sub-district. This effort is also a form of legal protection for superior regional products of Sragen Regency in accordance with the mandate of Sragen Regency Regional Regulation Number 3 Year 2013 concerning MSMEs.
THE ESTABLISHMENT OF GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION PROTECTION COMMUNITY (GIPC) AS A LEGAL PROTECTION MSME’S PRODUCTS
Triyono Adi Saputro;
Yudho Taruna Muryanto;
Suraji Suraji
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 8, No 3 (2021): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.26532/jph.v8i3.16320
A geographical indication is a part of intellectual property rights (IPR), which plays an important role in international trade as a magnet for consumers for MSMEs' products. However, the geographical indication is still underestimated by MSME players; and therefore, this issue requires further attention and analysis as the efforts to study the essence and urgency of the Geographical Indication Protection Community (GIPC) in supporting the realization of legal protection in regencies and cities throughout Indonesia. To support the investigation process, a case-based approach is required with primary and secondary research material sources through literature studies that correlate with business actors, rule of law and government. This study is doctrinal or normative research with qualitative data analysis. Efforts to establish Geographical Indication Protection Community (GIPC) are significant in assisting local MSME players to register legal protection through geographical indications and bridge local MSME players, local government, and stakeholders in sharing resources or information that can increase product competitiveness in regencies and cities in Indonesia on both national and international market scales.
Violation of Legal Certainty in the Sale and Purchase Deed made by the Land Deed Officer (PPAT)
Devarinta Hayyu Anandari;
Adi Sulistyono;
Suraji Suraji
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 1 No. 04 (2023): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v1i04.327
The regional revenue Office (Bapenda) and the Land Office apply the inclusion of Bapenda's appraisal price in the Sale and Purchase Deed made by the Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT). If this happens, then there will be no legal certainty for the parties. This happens mainly because the PPAT Sale and Purchase Deed is an authentic deed and has an important role in proving civil cases, especially if there is a dispute in court. Authentic Deeds have the highest position as documentary evidence in civil cases, below which are private deeds and unilateral deeds or unilateral confessions. The evidentiary value of an authentic deed based on Article 1870 of the Civil Code is perfect (volledig bewijskracht) and binding (bindede bewijskracht). This has consequences, whatever is stated in the authentic deed must be considered true and valid. Apart from that, the contents and statements contained therein are true.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Perusahaan Batubara Terhadap Pemenuhan Prestasi Akibat Larangan Ekspor Ditinjau Dari Hukum Positif Indonesia
Adinda Vinka Maharani;
Suraji Suraji
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): March: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v1i2.60
This research aims to determine the legal responsibilities of coal companies in fulfilling their achievements due to the export ban. This legal writing is included in the type of normative legal research using a legislative approach including primary legal materials and secondary legal materials collected through document study and analyzed using deductive legal material analysis using the syllogism method. This research examines the implementation of the Decree of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Number 139.K/HK.02/MEM.B/2021 regarding the fulfillment and prioritization of domestic coal needs. The failure to fulfill the Domestic Market Obligation then gave rise to an export ban by the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources through the issuance of Circular Letter from the Directorate General of Minerals and Coal, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Number B-605/MB.05/DJB.B/2021. The export ban then causes coal entrepreneurs to be unable to fulfill agreements with foreign companies. Non-fulfillment of achievements due to changes in Government policy in the form of an export ban is analyzed and categorized as force majeure so that non-performance, compensation or cancellation of the agreement cannot be sued. The legal responsibility that can be carried out by coal entrepreneurs in the event of an export ban is to submit a force majeure situation and prove that their party has been in good faith from the beginning until the agreement is in progress.
Keabsahan Perjanjian Paylater (Bayar Nanti) Pada Aplikasi Gojek Menurut KUH Perdata
Tiara Iga Mandera;
Suraji Suraji
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): March: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v1i2.105
This study aims to determine the validity of the agreement between Gopay Later according to the Indonesian Civil Code. This research is a normative juridical legal study with a legislative approach. Based on this research, it is found that the electronic agreement of Gopay Later between consumers and PT. Multifinance Anak Bangsa (Gojek) can be considered valid according to Indonesian contract law and does not contradict the Indonesian Civil Code.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pihak Pembeli Akibat Cacat Tersembunyi Pada Transaksi E-Commerce Melalui Marketplace Shopee
Harum Tri Nugraheni;
Suraji Suraji
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): March: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v1i2.107
This article aims to examine the form of legal protection for buyers due to the implementation of legal regulations in Indonesia regarding cases of hidden defects in e-commerce transactions. This research is normative legal research with primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. This research uses a legislative approach which will then be analyzed using the syllogism method with a deductive mindset. The results of this research show that internal legal protection is created by the parties themselves, if the business actor commits a breach of contract in the form of selling goods that are not in accordance with the agreement, this can result in internal protection not being fulfilled. Meanwhile, the UUPK and PP PSTE are a form of external legal protection because they are regulations that have been made by authorized officials to provide protection to weak parties from injustice.
Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Mengungkapkan Pemilik Manfaat (Beneficial Owner) Pada Pendirian Perusahaan
Bimo Kusumo Putro Indarto;
Suraji Suraji
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): July : Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v1i4.309
This article aims to examine the Role and Responsibility of Notary Related to Disclosing Beneficial Owner Information in Company Establishment. This research is a prescriptive normative legal research, using the statutory approach method and conceptual approach. The legal materials used consist of primary and secondary legal sources, which are analyzed through literature study of documents or library materials, and interpreted using deductive reasoning techniques and syllogism. The result to be achieved is that the notary is responsible for recording and identifying the beneficial owner. The notary is responsible in this capacity for ascertaining the identity of the beneficial owners and ensuring that all information related to them is correctly and accurately recorded in the company's official documents. In addition to ensuring recording accuracy, notaries are also responsible for reporting beneficial owner information to the Ministry of Law and Human Rights through online reporting systems such as AHU Online and the Administration System for Legal Entities (SABH).
Urgensi Penyuluhan Masyarakat tentang Peralihan Hak atas Tanah untuk Mengurangi Sengketa Kepemilikan Hak atas Tanah
Devarinta Hayyu Anandari;
Adi Sulistiyono;
Suraji Suraji
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 1 (2023): Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : CV. Dharma Samakta Edukhatulistiwa
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.61142/psnpm.v1.95
Banyaknya sengketa dibidang pertanahan menimbulkan pertanyaan tentang kesadaran Masyarakat dalam mengurus legalitas peralihan hak atas tanah. Masyarakat seringkali enggan dan menunda untuk mengurus legilitas peralihan hak atas tanah karena beberapa alasan, seperti ketidaktahuannya tentang cara mengurusnya, mempercayakan kepada calo, terkendala biaya pajak, dan sebagainya. Padahal dengan menunda mengurus legalitas peralihan hak atas tanah tersebut malah dapat merugikan dan meningkatkan kemungkinan terjadinya sengketa. Terbitnya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah menjadikan awal berlakunya kewajiban Pendaftaran peralihan hak atas tanah wajib dilakukan dihadapan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) dan didaftarkan di Kantor Pertanahan setempat. Pendaftaran Hak Atas Tanah berlaku asas publisitas, yang mana Peralihan Hak atas tanah barulah sah setelah didaftarkan di Kantor Pertanahan setempat. Namun walaupun 26 tahun telah berlalu sejak berlakuknya PP Pendaftaran Tanah, masih banyak masyarakat yang enggan untuk mengurus legalitas peralihan hak atas tanah. Untuk itu, para stakeholder dibidang pertanahan seharusnya terjun dan bekerjasama untuk melakukan penyuluhan yang masif tentang pendaftaran tanah.
Perlindungan Konsumen PayLater melalui Literasi Hukum, Transparansi Sistem, dan Regulasi Digital
Itsna Faiqatul Himmah;
Suraji
Proceedings National Conference Sinesia Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): National Conference Sinesia III | Tut Wuri Handayani
Publisher : Yayasan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sisi Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.69836/ncrcs-sinesia.v2i1.230
Perkembangan teknologi finansial di era ekonomi digital telah menghadirkan layanan Buy Now Pay Later (PayLater) yang semakin diminati karena kemudahan dan kecepatan aksesnya. Namun, kemudahan tersebut juga memunculkan persoalan yang tidak hanya bersifat yuridis, tetapi juga berkaitan dengan perilaku konsumen. Banyak pengguna cenderung mengabaikan informasi dalam perjanjian serta tidak memahami risiko finansial yang melekat, sehingga menunjukkan rendahnya literasi hukum dan literasi keuangan sebagai faktor utama kerentanan konsumen. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis keterkaitan antara perilaku konsumen, tingkat literasi, dan efektivitas perlindungan hukum dalam penggunaan PayLater, serta merumuskan model perlindungan konsumen yang lebih komprehensif. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan peraturan perundang-undangan, yang diperkaya dengan perspektif socio-humanities. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan konsumen belum optimal akibat kesenjangan antara kemudahan teknologi dan kesiapan masyarakat. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan literasi hukum dan keuangan yang didukung oleh transparansi sistem layanan serta regulasi yang adaptif. Penelitian ini menawarkan pendekatan perlindungan konsumen yang terintegrasi sebagai upaya menciptakan penggunaan PayLater yang lebih aman, bijak, dan berkeadilan.
Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Akibat Wanprestasi Jumlah Barang Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Online : Studi Putusan Nomor 629/Pdt.G/2020/PN JKT.SEL
Jihan Asyfa Viradrian;
Suraji Suraji
Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH)
Publisher : Indonesian Publication Center
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.67434/ijssh.v6i2.2583
This study examines the juridical qualification of breach of contract involving quantity discrepancies in online sales transactions and the effectiveness of consumer legal protection mechanisms, with a case study on Decision No. 629/Pdt.G/2020/PN JKT.SEL (Namastudio Case). A normative prescriptive legal method is applied using the statute and case approaches. The findings indicate that quantity discrepancies constitute imperfect performance under Article 1243 of the Civil Code, obliging the seller to provide compensation. Consumer protection may be pursued preventively through government supervision and repressively through the BPSK or general courts. Although the legal framework is adequate, its effectiveness remains hindered by low public legal awareness and weak oversight of digital businesses.