Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

KARAKTERISTIK KONTEN YOUTUBE SEBAGAI OBJEK JAMINAN UTANG DI BANK Abdul Hafid Firdaus; Dyah Ochtorina Susanti; Galuh Puspaningrum
Al Itmamiy Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (Muamalah) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Al Itmamiy : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/ai.v5i2.680

Abstract

This research aims to understand the characteristics of Youtube content as an object of collateral for debts at banks, the ratification of Government Regulation Number 24 of 2022 concerning Implementing Regulations of Law Number 24 of 2019 concerning the Creative Economy, Youtube content as another form of copyright in accordance with Article 40. Law Number 28 of 2014 can be used as an object of fiduciary guarantee. However, there are no specific regulations governing Youtube content or copyright as an object of fiduciary guarantee, so the main basis for the object of fiduciary guarantee is Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Guarantees, making financial institutions doubtful about providing credit. with Youtube content objects as collateral due to the lack of clarity in regulations, both in terms of valuation and execution. This research uses Normative Legal Research with a statutory, comparative and conceptual approach. This research seeks to provide an explanation and understanding of the characteristics of Youtube content intended by law as an object of collateral in banks.
Kesesuaian Ratio Decidendi Majelis Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha dalam Penyelesaian Monopoli Jasa Transportasi Pengiriman Benih Bening Lobster (Studi Putusan KPPU NO.04/KPPU-I/2021) Aufa Shofi Alfiana; Ikarini Dani Widayanti; Galuh Puspaningrum
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v10i2.6135

Abstract

Perubahan aturan mengenai pengelolaan benih bening lobster di Indonesia sangatlah berpengaruh terhadap bisnis benih bening lobster. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan dengan peraturan yang diciptakannya secara tidak langsung menunjuk PT. Aero Citra Kargo sebagai satu-satunya pelaku usaha yang dapat melakukan kegiatan transportasi benih bening lobster dalam sektor bisnis benih bening lobster. Sehubungan dengan permasalahan yang telah dikemukakan maka isu utama dalam penelitian ini adalah dampak dari peraturan yang mengakibatkan terjadinya praktik monopoli sebagaimana dalam Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor 04/KPPU-I/2021 mengenai dugaan pelanggaran Pasal 17 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 yang dilakukan oleh PT. AeroCitra Kargo dalam layanan pengurusan transportasi benih bening lobster. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa PT. AeroCitra Kargo terlibat dalam praktik monopoli dengan menyalahgunakan posisi dominannya untuk menghalangi pesaing masuk ke pasar dan mengeksploitasi konsumen, yaitu para eksportir, dengan menetapkan tarif layanan yang tinggi. Oleh karena itu, Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor 04/KPPU-I/2021 berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan dianggap tepat karena dapat membuktikan bahwa PT Aero Citra Kargo telah melanggar Pasal 17 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999.
Mining Business License Area For Religious Community Organizations In The Perspective Of The Welfare State Zakiyatun Nufus; Fendi Setyawan; Galuh Puspaningrum
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol. 7 No. 1: January 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v7i1.6970

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the Special Mining Business Permit Area for Religious Community Organizations in the Perspective of the Welfare State (Walfare State). This study uses normative legal research methods using a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. This study uses the theory of legal certainty, the theory of justice, and the theory of the welfare state as analytical knives in analyzing these problems. The results of the study show that the legal transformation in policies related to Article 83A PP No. 25/2024 is formally irrelevant to the rules above, namely in Law Number 4 of 2009 and Law Number 3 of 2020. However, the rules are still valid and can be implemented responsibly and professionally based on the analysis of legislation and theoretical analysis carried out by researchers, decisions made by government officials have binding force on all members of society, and have a public function, in the sense of performing public services.